It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 3:38 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 8:44 am
Posts: 272
Location: Cambridge
The post office is suggesting the need to get rid of the requirement of counties in postal addresses such as, in case of my local county council:
Cambridgeshire County Council
Shire Hall, Castle Hill
Cambridge
Cambs
CB3 0AP


with just simply
Cambridgeshire County Council
Shire Hall, Castle Hill
Cambridge
CB3 0AP


See -> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rcels.html

Hardly radical, but some are seeing as some European plot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:28 pm
Posts: 242
Location: Bæææææææææærgen
I think my favourite thing about that article is the opening line. 'Hail from Avon?' you mean the county of Avon? The county of Avon that hasn't existed in 14 years?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:53 pm 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 4312
Quote:
I am with Andrea (12.35) on this I will not be party to this erosion that stinks of the EU. Who do they think they are the Borg out of Star Trek where resistance is futile ?. Sorry pal, I am with the resistance on this. There is no way such things as the Cheshire show will be refered to as the 4NW Show. We are not going to throw away over 1000 years of history for the sake of what looks like an efficency drive by the Post Office,which I suspect is an attempt long term to standardise to a EU post coding system by first taking away the individuality of the area.



There's no way the Cheshire Show will be referred to as the 4NW Show? Did someone say it would then? Isn't this about delivering letters? I don't think the Royal Mail have any say in the name of county shows. Bell-end. Oh, I've been writing Kent on letters I send locally for work, even though it's not required, and I still haven't had my door busted down or my property taken away by the Euro-Police. JUST SHUT UP.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:33 pm
Posts: 4176
Location: Trostberg, Germany (nice expat)
So even though it means one less thing to do when writing an address, they still manage to fucking moan!

_________________
'Because we've reached the limits of what rectal probing can teach us'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:05 pm
Posts: 2466
Location: hove
Quote:
The name of counties will no longer be needed on letters and parcels if it is to go ahead.


there is no suggestion that your letter wouldn't be delivered if you did put your county name on it, just that it's not longer going to be needed (i'm surprised it still was actually).
if you want to continue to write your county on it, surely you still can? it's just that there is no reason other than hallowed tradition (which this is apparently) anymore.

_________________
i have an art blog: http://procrastinationathon.blogspot.com/
and a review blog: http://blindwithwoodenhands.blogspot.com/
double blog! what does it mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
But don't you see? The Royal Mail has counties hostage, they are the post offices bitch.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:51 pm
Posts: 1099
Location: Cleethorpes
The eejits seem to be confusing the existence of counties with Royal Mail administrative requirements. Are they not aware of the way the world works?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 1439
"Are they not aware of the way the world works?"

Mailite thinking :

I know how the world works, and I know that I am the victim of evil shadowy conspirators who are out to destroy everything I hold dear, ie everything that makes me, as a white, lower middle-class, semi-educated, right-wing, taxpaying, immigrant- and criminal-hating southern Englishman, superior to everyone else in the world.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:01 pm
Posts: 640
Some letters I just send with the first line of the address and the postcode. Always gets there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 6011
Location: That London
I can't believe anyone really thinks counties are being abolished in the wider world and we'll all have to call Anglesey LL65 from now on (for example). Has to be a case of moaning for the sake of it. I bet there wasn't all this moaning back in the Middle Ages when they stopped using Wessex, Mercia etc. Although I can just picture the Medieval Mail...'Ye Normannes are takynge YOUR jobbes!' 'Sign ye up NOW to smite the heathen Mohammedan in the Thirde Crusade and receeve ye this merveillouse FREE wheelbarrowe worth 5 groats!'

(and before anyone criticises the English there (or Englysshe) I actually studied several medieval languages as part of my degree and am fully aware that's not at all authentic)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 422
I've been lurking forever, but I thought I'd add my 2 pence.


When I was is primary school (about 12 years ago) the entire class as an experiment wrote letters to ourselves. On the Letter was just out names and postcode. For example...

R. Littlejohn
CU41 2NT

And if I remember correctly, every single one of the letters arrived at their destination.


Even today when filling out forms, or when someone asks me for my address its the house name (which is 'Daily Mail Cottage' believe it or not, but I'll get into this later) and then my Postcode. I know the rest in the middle to be pointless. If people have my postcode...the're sorted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4954
Location: West Midlands
When I worked for Bournemouth Borough Council (oh yes, Bournemouth, Gloucestershire, Monmouthshire, Ealing - I've been around), we were told not to put Dorset on our addresses, presumably as Bournemouth (and Poole) were trying to distance themselves from as they saw it, the yokel-infested county council they were once part of but had calved away from.

Guess what party was in power and encouraged this.

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:03 pm 
Picklechu2 wrote:
Some letters I just send with the first line of the address and the postcode. Always gets there.


the machines do prefer a street as well, otherwise it might get rejected and have to be sorted by hand

i rarely do manual sorting but when i do you get a lot that actually have the county, but not the postcode. for some counties that isn't much of an issue but, for example, 'cheshire' could mean a CH,CW,WA,SY or SK postcode depending on where in the county it is.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:01 pm
Posts: 640
Yes, I meant the number and street name, plus postcode.

1 Lotsofhouses Street
AB12 3CD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail v. Royal Mail
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:10 pm 
Picklechu2 wrote:
Yes, I meant the number and street name, plus postcode.

1 Lotsofhouses Street
AB12 3CD


ah right, misunderstood, sorry


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group