It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 9:43 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:45 am
Posts: 4385
Location: The woods outside the big society
Top stores agree to hide lads' mags from children... but WHSmith refuses to cave in to pressure
By Sean Poulter

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1ElwZqlOL


Quote:
I'd be more concerned about children being exposed to the horrors of the dm.
Bertram Gussett, The Real Middle England.

_________________
Mailwatch. Love us or leave us.
http://www.coalitionofresistance.org.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:14 pm
Posts: 183
How helpful some one at the Mail has gone that extra mile and made a breast count of three lads mags.
Why employ and pay models when you can zoom up Kate Moss' dress for free?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:32 pm
Posts: 21
If the children want a look at a set of tits they can just log onto http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html and take a look down the right side.

_________________
And every doggie has a tri-coloured ribbon tied firmly to it's tail
And it wouldn't be surprising if there'd be another Rising
Said the man from the Daily Mail


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:33 pm
Posts: 4176
Location: Trostberg, Germany (nice expat)
I remember some time ago Smiths used to sell true nudie mags, Playboy, Penthouse etc, but then stopped. Whether this was a result of a tabloid campaign i don't know.

One area i think does need to be looked into though is the prevelence of 'sexline' ads in these and even DVD and gaming mags, the latter of which can be said to be aimed at children as well as adults.

_________________
'Because we've reached the limits of what rectal probing can teach us'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Mail shits on one of it's big sellers on the high street, eh? I forsee this running for a while.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3837
The Mail v Smiths with Nuts et al on the side. That's my own personal Top Trumps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5802
Location: Arslikan EU
Quote:
If I want gratuitous nipples, wardrobe malfunctions & upskirt al la Moss, my first choice is the DM.

Bishop Basher, Putney 12.25


_________________
"Fanaticism is the only form of willpower to which the weak minded and irresolute can rise."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 3801
Location: Magic Swirling Ship
Quote:
The Mail is just as bad as these magazines, in the last week you have published Emma Watson's nipple,Kim Catrall bent over showing her behind and Denise Welch in her underwear.Should I ban my children from looking at the Mail?
- Gary, liverpool, 23/2/2011 6:32


Yes. But not for those reasons.

Quote:
This is plain discrimination. Despite being over 18 I'm too short to reach the top shelf. A lot of teens these days are taller than me so I have to ask them to reach the title for me.
- Avid Reader, Sussex, 23/2/2011 7:57


:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11925
Location: East London
Paying models to take pictures of them v hanging around celebrities, trying to sneak a view of something rude

I think the ladmags come out ahead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:45 am
Posts: 4385
Location: The woods outside the big society
At least they've got decent tech/boy's toys articles.

_________________
Mailwatch. Love us or leave us.
http://www.coalitionofresistance.org.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Actually once you get past the tits element "Lads mags" can be quite entertaining purely as a read. They clearly don't take themselves too seriously and IMO they've grown up a bit from where they were a few years ago. FHM is, IMO, a pretty good magazine, although obviously I disapprove of the rampant sexism in seeing a minor celebrity in her smalls (sometimes).

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:19 am
Posts: 422
Quote:
Nanny state strikes again. Haven't they got anything better to do with their time. These are hardly pornographic magazine and since when did some pictures of scantily clad women do anyone harm?

- Steve Angell, London, 23/2/2011 1:59


Nanny State?

It was a group of mums, members of the public. Nothing to do with the state.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 4:35 pm 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 4311
eddyk wrote:
Quote:
Nanny state strikes again. Haven't they got anything better to do with their time. These are hardly pornographic magazine and since when did some pictures of scantily clad women do anyone harm?

- Steve Angell, London, 23/2/2011 1:59


Nanny State?

It was a group of mums, members of the public. Nothing to do with the state.



You sheeple - it was Gordon Clown and Alastair Starling dressed as mums.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23054
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
For a moment I thought that said 'dressed as nuns'.

If that image comes back into my mind as I am trying to sleep I will never forgive you...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs WH Smith
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:26 pm 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 4311
Sorry. Someone on the BBC Have Your Say board kept referring to Alasdair (sp?) Darling as 'Starling'. Don't know if he was trying to say 'Stalin' or if he really thinks being called a small bird is an insult but i'm glad he tried as it makes me laugh whenever I think of it.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group