It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 1:23 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
It's bad near me too.

Old Rees-Mogg must have had a right top trumps going on in his head. Litter= falling standards, bad. People trying to sort it out=good. Unless they work for the council.

I've never understood the right's hatred of local government.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Simple. Their friends aren't making profit from them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
They surely are. Loads of stuff is outsourced.

Quite how that fits with the "Brown bought votes from the public sector" theory of Tim Montgomerie, I don't know. "Vote for us, we're transferring your job to Cuntco" isn't an obvious winner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Posts: 2005
He was on 'This Week'. Just awful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 1622
Quote:
Jacob Rees-Mogg suggested the distinctive headwear should be imposed on all council officials with the power to hand out fines for minor offences such as dropping litter or playing music too loudly.


Well that didn't take long...

Mother stabbed to death 'for asking neighbours to turn down music'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1gJj5NpQi

Perhaps if some council busybody/Envirnomental Health Officer had intervened to deal with this "minor offence"...

_________________
I'd rather shoot Paul Dacre than anyone else in the country- Colin Dexter. A direct quote from the Radio Times m'learned friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
If Jacob lived in a council flat, he might not think playing music as loud as you like was the right of every freeborn Englishman. And he might understand that a lot of the megablaster types aren't exactly loveable eccentrics.

Nobhead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:43 pm
Posts: 3855
Location: Chuffing Barsetshire
The shortest set of double yellows in Britain (which are the length of four toy cars)

Councillor listens to residents scandal! And the jobsworth turns out to have a sense of humour:

Quote:
'Local people said it was not obvious where the dividing line was so a decision was made to put in a small section of double yellow lines. I wish they weren't there

'As a councillor you are expected to do many things for residents but getting into the Guinness Book of Records for the shortest set of double yellow lines isn't one I anticipated.'

Unlike the Mailites…
Quote:
The Idiot at the council who ordered this stupidity should be sacked along with the morons who actually carried it out.

- Howard, Preston, 18/12/2011 13:36 Rating 1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Says it all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2827
Council accused of wasting public cash for taking housing tenants to see the MUPPETS

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1l3jZNxLI

I'm guessing you can all predict the type of comments this has inspired, though I did quite like this one:
Quote:
Oh well .. It'll give Littlejohn an easy column for Friday.
- Geoff, Birmingham UK, 31/1/2012 14:31


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 3:42 pm
Posts: 102
Location: Devon
This is the cinema that local residents, council, pressure groups etc... have been trying desperately for several years. I think it's a great idea. This town is dying on it's arse and just for once the council have tried to do something positive and yet local and now national media slate the idea :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:43 pm
Posts: 3855
Location: Chuffing Barsetshire
Killjoy council workers saw snowmen's heads off after children take hours to build them... because they 'damage the grass'

Quote:
Fellow resident Gabriella Newbold said: 'I saw this happening and was equally shocked. I'm very annoyed. One of the snowmen was made by my kids at 8am.

That's nothing. I once built a sandcastle, and as soon as I'd finished the sea had totally destroyed it. Boo hoo, let's call the Daily Mail and whine about it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2827
Going Viral: Lambeth cut services...but not their advertising budget, clearly

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1luzmpHB8

Image

Quote:
[P. Staines] has highlighted this brilliant photo, berating government budget cuts in Lambeth. Somewhat ironically, they seem keen to vocally oppose cuts by utilising what appears to be a never-ending advertising budget. Nothing like priorities...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
Lambeth might not need to advertise if they had 4 national newspapers doing it for them for free.

See also "why do they have so many press officers?"

Because you lot write lots of shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:47 pm
Posts: 43
Posters aren't exactly expensive. Would be a few pounds each in quantity, probably less.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:10 pm
Posts: 606
Location: London
I thought these type of advertising hoardings where operated by private companies under contracts from local authorities and those contracts specified that the companies had to display concil information on one side. So I'd imagine the costs are very low.

_________________
"..The Daily Mail - not so much a newspaper as an idiot's guidebook issued in bite-size daily installments" Charlie Brooker


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group