The Guardian wrote:
we're letting him red herring us again. it doesn't matter if she used it or not.
if you (graun) want to critisice her writing, fine. if you want to critisise the perticular way she's written about her abortions, then (and i can't state this part strongly enought) provided you supply quotes, then you may do that also.
but just to attack her, to label her stupid, and a "slag", on the basis that you know she has had abortions, no.
Get the FULL quote for the slag reference.
Shriek-Porter always goes on about how clever she is. She had two abortions by the time she was 19. How clever is that eh? She was on TV a while back promoting her latest book F*ck You! (or whatever) she was decrying women you don't shag on the first "date". Like there's something wrong with waiting a couple of days. The slag.
presumably you mean to imply you only meant "slag" in regards to the first date thing. the fact that you'd used a new sentance made me think you were applying it to your whole post. for this confussion i'm sorry.
now, your turn to quote ANY of the stuff she said.
i have an art blog: http://procrastinationathon.blogspot.com/
and a review blog: http://blindwithwoodenhands.blogspot.com/
double blog! what does it mean?