It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 4:48 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 707 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 48  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4954
Location: West Midlands
Quote:
"I remember when a bit of charlie was for pop stars and celebrities, demonised by Daily Mail readers getting drunk in naff wine bars. Nowadays, they're my best customers!"


From the book/film, Layer Cake.

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:21 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11953
Location: East London
Anyone without a daughter to bail them out can get stuffed.

Quote:
Could someone explain to me why some people 'turn to drugs' when they are under stress...or even need some fun ? The social, health and financial consequencesof getting hooked onto drugs must be obvious to everyone. There's been more than enough publicity in the media for many years. It beats me. Are some people just very stupid or what ?
- Jimmy Thomas, Nottingham England, 31/3/2011 8:09


The fact that Mail's shit and costs more than the BBC would seem to be obvious, but doesn't stop some people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:17 am
Posts: 449
Location: Derby, UK
It must be wonderful for Jimmy to have no vices whatsoever. I bet he's a laugh a minute on a night out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23087
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Jimmy's opinion is widely shared. Why on earth would people do drugs?

Because they FECKIN' ENJOY IT! and because MOST PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH IT! and because EVERYBODY ELSE DOES IT!

Look at the odds of suffering harm because of ecstacy - then think of the fun - hardly rocket science, is it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:30 pm 
Offline
in a handcart
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 1638
Location: Sussex by the sea
IanC wrote:
"The more inquisition"

Wtf? :lol:

Nobody expects the more inquisition! :mrgreen:

_________________
"Stop making up quotes and attributing them to me" - Voltaire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 1439
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... pathy.html


Not AGAIN................


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:01 pm
Posts: 640
What the fuck is this on about?

"Latin expressions correction: QUID PRO QUO does not exist it's QUI PRO QUO and it means that there has been a misunderstanding (someone understood qui instead of quo) - the way anglo-saxons use it should be DO UT DES (I get something in return for something I do). Sounds pedantic, I know, but that's just worng. Thanks.

- bonnie, temporarily in italy, 21/4/2011 7:24"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 957
Quote:
Christina and Simon Reynolds have done just this. Their priority is to send Oscar to a £4,000-a term private secondary school. The quid pro quo is they have pared down other spending to the minimum.


Boo-fucketty-hoo. They spend more on a fancy school than lots of people earn in a year, and they spend half an aslyum seekers entire allowance on fuel alone.

_________________
The upper hand is on the other foot now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 6011
Location: That London
Why do these people put themselves forward for these stories? It's basically just a two-minute hate for the readers and makes the family look like a bunch of twats (which they kind of are, but still).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23087
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Picklechu2 wrote:
What the fuck is this on about?

"Latin expressions correction: QUID PRO QUO does not exist it's QUI PRO QUO and it means that there has been a misunderstanding (someone understood qui instead of quo) - the way anglo-saxons use it should be DO UT DES (I get something in return for something I do). Sounds pedantic, I know, but that's just worng. Thanks.

- bonnie, temporarily in italy, 21/4/2011 7:24"


Yes, in Italian or French you pedantic tosser, but not in English, or more pertinently, Latin. 'Qui' is a feckin' French/Italian word! Quid pro quo means 'this for that' not 'who' you numbnuts. Quiproquo is something else entirely... in fact it is this phrase which is probably the mistake, by some medieval transcriber.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 57
Sounds pedantic, I know, but that's just worng. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 1439
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ishop.html


I see the Mail unquestioningly equates 'Anglican' with 'middle-class'. Now I don't know much about the Church of England, I admit, but is this strictly accurate?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7344
glasgowgril wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1379390/Open-Church-England-schools-faiths-says-bishop.html


I see the Mail unquestioningly equates 'Anglican' with 'middle-class'. Now I don't know much about the Church of England, I admit, but is this strictly accurate?


In my (outdated) experience, I'd say no.

C of E certainly has a big crop of schools strategically placed just outside the bigger cities.
There's a smaller number standing where they were founded in what are now inner city locations where many a bishop would fear to tread.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7344
But then the Church of England is a strange beast like that.

History has tied it to some severely depressed regions (if only by dint of parish boundaries and property ownership).
The bulk of the church appears uncomfortable with ministering to the diocese of Peckham or whatever,
preferring the idea of a village fete and jam with the W.I.

The evangelical wing (Not noted for their social progressiveness) are often found doing preaching and charity on this turf.

Worldwide the Episcopalians (That's the international name for the C of E) is also fraught with contradictions.
Pillar of establishment in some parts of the Commonwealth, but at the heart of radical change at others (e.g. Arch Desmond Tutu in S.A.)

I like to think of the Peace and Reconciliation Commisssion as the real live manifestation of "Cake or Death"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: More "middle-class" bollocks
PostPosted: Wed May 18, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 2756
Location: N Wales Compound, EUKSSR
Families at 'breaking point' as bills jump £54 a week in just six months and inflation hits 4.5% to spark mortgage rise fears
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... onths.html

Quote:
So, the people who've done by far the best out of the last decade are complaining because they're expected to (finally) pick up the bill for their own extravagence? How about we stop moaning and expecting our children and grandchildren to pick up the bill for us?
- Eunice, Cheshire, 18/5/2011 12:20

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 707 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 48  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hairy_Ears and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group