Dr David Kelly Conspiracy Stories

Big Vern · **Joined:** Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:49 am **Posts:** 807

"Uniquely for a suspicious death, no coroner’s inquest has been held"

"Dr Kelly left no suicide note and had arranged to meet his daughter on July 17, 2003, the day he was last seen alive"

"On the morning of his death, he booked a return ticket to Iraq in connection with his work"

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sat May 14, 2011 11:04 am

>Yawns ostentatiously<

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat May 14, 2011 2:48 pm

I posted a reply in support of the most sensible comment I could find.

"The Tories are now in power and have access to all the medical evidence, forensic evidence and security evidence. The Tory Attorney General has all the paperwork and he has concluded that he won't have a further investigation unless significant new evidence comes to light. If there was anything sinister don't you think that the Tories would have great pleasure in burying New Labour? Mrs Kelly and her family are content with the outcome of the Hutton Inquiry and do not want an inquest. Don't you think that if they were unhappy with the conclusions they would be demanding a coroner's inquest?
- Neil, Wales, 14/5/2011 8:16 ---------------------------Well said Neil. There are people posting on here whose hatred of Blair has blinded them to any sense of reason to the point that they believe that the Tories are conspiring in a cover up to protect Blair. Can anyone give me one reason why they would want to do that? Jim Durham"

The conspiracy theorists remind me of those that believe the moon landings were faked and the USSR colluded with the USA, at the height of the cold-war, to cover up the deception.

lectrospin · **Joined:** Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:19 pm **Posts:** 280

Seems alot like black propaganda to me.

satnav · **Posted:** Mon May 16, 2011 12:24 pm

I wonder why the Mail is happy to stoke up conspiracy theories over David Kelly while totally rubbishing any conspiracy claims about the death of Diana?

Paul · **Posted:** Thu May 19, 2011 10:48 am

No need for inquest on Dr Kelly says PM, leading to anger as Cameron appears to pre-judge review

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1Mp0Rph2H

a poke in the eye for the Mail :lol:

satnav · **Posted:** Thu May 19, 2011 12:03 pm

Most of the comments under the story seem to be attacking Cameron but there are also quite a few trying to make out that the family want the case looked at again, I can't say I've seen much evidence to back up this claim apart from one of his cousins once saying something after being badgered by the Mail for a quote.

Paul · **Posted:** Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:09 pm

Doctors will launch court fight if Dr David Kelly inquest demand is turned down

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1Ocun5OyP

usual comments!

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:03 pm

They're off!

Maily conspiracy nutter story

And interesting that the Mail had uncovered FURY within 5 minutes of the statement being made. Odd that.

I thought Grieve did pretty well. I see that the Hon Member for Lewes was not in the chamber...

Paul · **Posted:** Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:14 pm

The Hon Member for Lewes relies on the DM for his version of the facts.

Quote:

The family of Dr Kelly do not want any further action taken, if they thought there was any doubt, they would be calling for another inquest. Dr Frost wants a public fund set up to cover legal costs should he lose. He does not sound very confident does he.

- Anne, West Midlands, 9/6/2011 5:05
Click to rate Rating 248

Report abuse

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1OotR7oSE

oboogie · **Posted:** Thu Jun 09, 2011 5:58 pm

David Cameron and the Tories are desperate to cover this up to protect his friends in the Labour party including Blair and McBroon because the Tories were even more keen on the illeagal war than most Labour MPs.
- Wally Toynbee, Mailwatchwatcher, 9/6/2011 15:06
Click to rate Rating 11
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1Onb1feBD

Fozzy · **Posted:** Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:56 pm

How sad is Wally that he now defines his entire existence by reference to hanging around reading this site?

Paul · **Posted:** Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:15 am

'I'm sure I know the truth about Dr Kelly’s death. But, thanks to Hutton, the world will never be told', his friend reveals

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1P4x9DzBW

Quote:

The conspiracy theorists are – as usual – wildly off target about Dr Kelly’s tragic suicide.

Tom Mangold in a "reverse ferret" opinion piece that will have the nutters wailing "foul".

Although we have been there before

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/co ... 58868.html

oboogie · **Posted:** Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:30 am

"Sorry Tom. You knew Dr Kelly, but you are speculating and it doesn't explain all the loose ends so forensically documented in Norman Baker's book. Kelly knew so much he was a threat to the control freak Blair establishment. And is it coincidence that Robin Cook, the ethical foreign policy fan, also met a mysterious death?
- Jools, London, 12/6/2011 5:27
Click to rate Rating 13"

"So what if you were his friend Tom, I read about him in The Daily Mail"

Do we need to start a new thread for Robin Cook conspiracy theories?

Jools please pop round when you have a minute, my windows are filthy and could do with a good lick.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1P3IYvits

Paul · **Posted:** Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:59 am

Doctors unleash legal challenge over inquest Dr David Kelly never had

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... y-had.html

I wonder why the family are not pushing for this?

Dr David Kelly Conspiracy Stories

Who is online