Royal uterus watch

Fozzy · **Posted:** Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:25 am

We should have started this on the day of the wedding really. Here's today's sample:

Quote:

Are Kate and Wills planning a family? Couple save top tier of wedding cake for christening of first child

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1SpAtHheC

ezinra · **Posted:** Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:49 am

My favourite thread title yet.

Arnold · **Posted:** Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:58 am

Looks like someone's feeling broody, Kate! Duchess of Cambridge more interested in youngsters as Prince William takes part in his first Trooping the Colour

bluebellnutter · **Posted:** Fri Jul 22, 2011 11:16 am

Fozzy wrote:

We should have started this on the day of the wedding really. Here's today's sample:

Quote:

Are Kate and Wills planning a family? Couple save top tier of wedding cake for christening of first child

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1SpAtHheC

Isn't that quite a common practice for some people?

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 760

We did it and we're not even having our littleun christened.

Fozzy · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Here we go -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... cting.html

Quote:

Rumours circulate that the Duchess of Cambridge is pregnant after she refuses to eat peanut paste during royal visit

Or maybe she just doesn't like peanut butter?

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:00 pm

What is the difference (if any) between peanut paste and peanut butter? I've never heard of peanut paste.

Carlos The Badger · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:23 pm

oboogie wrote:

What is the difference (if any) between peanut paste and peanut butter? I've never heard of peanut paste.

Me neither. I suspect it's the same thing (only Danish).

This is what I get as an official description of peanut butter.

Quote:

Peanut butter is a food paste made primarily from ground dry roasted peanuts...

Arnold · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:10 pm

This could be interesting if true, and she's carrying a girl. The heads of state have only agreed to a change to the rules of succession. The law has yet to be changed. Is it not too late for a female foetus existing now to be next in line after William if there is a later male child?

Timbo · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:16 pm

Arnold wrote:

This could be interesting if true, and she's carrying a girl. The heads of state have only agreed to a change to the rules of succession. The law has yet to be changed. Is it not too late for a female foetus existing now to be next in line after William if there is a later male child?

Good point. Is the line determined at the time of succession, or at the birth of the heir?

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 4:46 pm

Timbo wrote:

Arnold wrote:

This could be interesting if true, and she's carrying a girl. The heads of state have only agreed to a change to the rules of succession. The law has yet to be changed. Is it not too late for a female foetus existing now to be next in line after William if there is a later male child?

Good point. Is the line determined at the time of succession, or at the birth of the heir?

The conspiracy theorists could have some fun with that one. 'They only agreed to change the law because they already knew it was going to be a girl.'

Fozzy · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:39 pm

oboogie wrote:

Timbo wrote:

Arnold wrote:

This could be interesting if true, and she's carrying a girl. The heads of state have only agreed to a change to the rules of succession. The law has yet to be changed. Is it not too late for a female foetus existing now to be next in line after William if there is a later male child?

Good point. Is the line determined at the time of succession, or at the birth of the heir?

The conspiracy theorists could have some fun with that one. 'They only agreed to change the law because they already knew it was going to be a girl.'

What do you mean, "could have"? When the proposal came out more formally a couple of weeks ago I saw a number of internet idiots assuming that she was secretly pregnant and that it was known to be a girl.

If they do have a girl as a first child before the law is changed formally, I suspect it could simply be framed in terms whereby it applies to existing children.

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:33 pm

I doff my cap to you Fozzy, you are keeping a closer eye on the "internet idiots" than I am.

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 760

How could she really be 'secretly pregnant' unless they are going to claim that her mighty royal womb is capable of producing eirs in just six months?

McSnark · **Posted:** Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:04 am

Silkyman wrote:

How could she really be 'secretly pregnant' unless they are going to claim that her mighty royal womb is capable of producing eirs in just six months?

She's actually a lizard queen. That, or they're all fucking fruitcakes.

Royal uterus watch

Who is online