It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 1:16 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22891
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Is it one of these?

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2829
Councils banned from snooping on your sex life

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1WnEwQxTg

Quote:
Town hall 'sex snoopers' will today be banned from bombarding people with intrusive questions about their private lives.

Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles said he was appalled that residents seeking to access basic services were being grilled about their sex lives, disabilities, religion, ethnicity and employment.

He said they should not have to reveal detailed personal information to get their bins emptied or take out a library book.

More mail friendly bollocks from Pickles.
Quote:
Dudley council asked me if I was British, I said no, I am English, they then told me that I couldn't write that, so I asked the man why the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish had their own boxes and not the English, he couldn't answer that one so I just wrote English in the box marked as British, again he said that I couldn't write that, so I wrote Anglo-Saxon, then told him to shut up and put up!
- S. I. Mather, Bradwell, UK., 2/9/2011 7:30

Quote:
If you pay your council tax you will receive the services of the public servants who are being paid from that tax. These council employees, i.e. our employees, are there to carry out what is required by us of them. If I buy an item from a shop I expect the shop to honour the contract that has been struck, if I do not receive the goods or services paid for then I can take legal action against that business. Council tax payers can expect the same standard of service. The shop does not subject me to an inquisition, nor should the council. The SERVANTS do NOT question their paymasters. Public servants are not Lords or Barons ruling by decree they are there to SERVE.
- Russ., Worcestershire., 2/9/2011 0:52

Quote:
Town hall apparatchiks are paid by the public, to serve the public-they have no right to intrude into people's lives. Their function is to ensure public amenities are properly administered-that is all. Under the New Soviets, aka Labour, they became the spies of the Government-this and the NS' obsession with so called diversity and multiculturalism, which actually encouraged segregation, ensured a regime of unnaceptable thought policing. I hope CamClegg realise once and for all that true equality means equal rights for all-and this means that someone's religion, sexuality and race are immaterial-everyone, irrespective of NS' tick box criteria, has housing requirements and needs their bins emptied-and marking someone down because they rightfully tell the Council to get knotted, is tyrannical and demonstrates the very discrimination and intolerance they arrogantly presumed was present in everyone else. Cut them down to size! and get rid of the non-jobs e.g diversity monitors for zoos etc
- Combover Mohican, Eastbourne, 2/9/2011 9:40
Quote:
All councils are grossly overstaffed and will do anything to justify their existence. Council tax is excessive in the extreme to pay these parasites .Even the NHS produces a 20 page questionnaire for patients views of their GPs.Questions about religion,sexuality and hundreds more of irrelevant data to provide jobs for the boys. It is time to stop this nonsense and reduce government (our money) funding of the guilty parties. A 20% reduction in council tax and NHS payments would be a start.
- btbob, hailsham uk, 2/9/2011 8:53
Quote:
Just goes to prove that Britain was silently moving rapidly to becoming a communist state.
- Seve, Spain, 2/9/2011 7:35

Quote:
This is merely a temporary damage limitation exercise. Just wait for the legislation which allows ruling governments to install cameras in residential homes, directed from the EU, of course. "Ve haf vays of making you talk...". I'm almost beginning to look forward to dying.
- Withnail Xtreme, Camden Town, 2/9/2011 1:24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:39 pm 
Offline
Lord of Flangebury-Under-Scythe
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:33 pm
Posts: 4264
Quote:
Quote:
Dudley council asked me if I was British, I said no, I am English, they then told me that I couldn't write that, so I asked the man why the Scots, Welsh and Northern Irish had their own boxes and not the English, he couldn't answer that one so I just wrote English in the box marked as British, again he said that I couldn't write that, so I wrote Anglo-Saxon, then told him to shut up and put up!
- S. I. Mather, Bradwell, UK., 2/9/2011 7:30



No you didn't, you made that up.

I take it they mean sexuality rather than sex lives. I've never filled in any form that asked me whether I liked oral pleasure or took it up the wrong 'un. I must go to different clubs to The Mail staff.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:32 am
Posts: 718
mojojojo wrote:
I've never filled in any form that asked me whether I liked oral pleasure or took it up the wrong 'un.

Never applied to be a priest then?

Messianic Trees wrote:
Councils banned from snooping on your sex life

Shit, that's the rest of my day out of the window.

_________________
"Winterval is the favourite myth of the lunatic right who base most of their weekly columns on angry Brie-based dreams rather than looking out of their window." (Robin Ince)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22891
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Funny thing - I'm looking forward to 'withnail Xtreme' dying as well. Or at least keeping his insanity to himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5796
Location: Arslikan EU
Quote:
Typical of Pickles going around banning things.

- Anne, West Midlands, 02/9/2011 11:43
Click to rate Rating 23

Report abuse

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1WpQUVfkG

_________________
"Fanaticism is the only form of willpower to which the weak minded and irresolute can rise."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
But if they can't ask about sexuality, how can we stop teh gayzzzz claiming benefits to fund their project to ram it down our throats?

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2829
How can they ban us from picking BLACKBERRIES? Officials claim it will harm the environment on Common

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1a5VlNxOK

Unmoderated, though my comment asking why there's no sad face® accompanying the article doesn't seem to have made it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22891
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Recently the authorities in Normandy banned the picking of mushrooms in the Parc Regional - simply because so many were being taken (and sold - yes that's you Carluccio) that it was having an impact on the numbers growing. I suspect the same is true of the blackberries. But, in Mailcommentuniverse, you don't conserve, do you? You use it all up till it runs out and then you moan...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2829
Spot on. Second to last paragraph:
Quote:
A council spokesman said there were no laws which ban blackberry picking on the common but said that 'large scale blackberry or nut collecting would be inappropriate' if it damaged plants and habitat protected by wildlife legislation'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2829
On the blackberry story:

Quote:
Soldiers would turn in their graves at this ruling. The Taliban have won. Next ban on kite flying.
- anon, anon, 7/10/2011 13:50


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
Coz that was what the Taliban wanted all along. They banged on about Sharia Law, death to the west and all that but really all they wanted to do was to stop people getting blackberries in enormous quantities.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
Good to hear that the council have trusted the general public to be better than Mail readers. I'm sure a lot of the people who turn up will do exactly the right thing- not take too many.

Isn't this actually old fashioned common sense and whatever?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2829
Why on earth do Mailites keep insisting on things like this:
Quote:
A picture of the Hawthorn's Centre staff (Jobsworths) please !
- Thimbles, Norwich UK , 07/10/2011 14:49

(Don't answer; I know it's because they're spiteful, vindictive wankers).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail v local government.
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11831
Location: East London
Quote:
Look ,how could you possibly go and pick this fruit ? everyone knows that Great crested newts absolutely thrive on blackberries, - in pies , - with apple and custard. You always see so many of them up on the brambles,every day,collecting blackberries in their little baskets. I also think that people should be prevented from breathing in air, and fa****g on this Common as its is obvious that it will damage the SSI, and the poor newts, which are obviously critical to the continuation of this Earth. And, - how can the staff at the Centre possibly be allowing people to walk on the grass, bending and breaking the stalks?They must be made to levitate at all times. Personally I cannot understand why the whole of mankind is not just eradicated, because the future of the newts is obviously paramount !
- Worzel, Turkey, 07/10/2011 13:53


This devastating bit of satire is in the green.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group