Look at what this cunt's up to now.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100105347/why-are-feminists-getting-their-knickers-in-a-twist-about-topman-t-shirts/

Feminazis don't find t-shirts that make jokes about domestic violence funny because they hate working class lads. Do you see?

What an iconoclast he is. Brilliant!

If you really want to be sick look at the comments from the microbes below the "article".

"What could be worse than the government's workfare programme?", almost every columnist in the land is currently asking. I can think of one thing worse: the awesome and terrifying power of the commentariat and its slavish groupies amongst the Twitterati to strike down initiatives like workfare and almost any other government project that they don’t like. That's the real story here. Forget the historically illiterate wailing about young people being forced into "slave labour" or the idea that getting yoof to work in return for money is the Worst Thing Ever. The ins and outs of workfare itself pale into insignificance when compared with the new power of tiny cliques of cut-off people to override public opinion and reshape modern Britain.

the new power of tiny cliques of cut-off people to override public opinion and reshape modern Britain.

The collapse of workfare is testament to the power of the modern media elite and its slavish Twitter followers

Now that Toby has stopped blogging for the Telegraph, there was I thinking that Delingpole would be unopposed his quest to be the stupidest cunt on there. Perhaps I was wrong:

Well said.

Do they really believe opposition to workfare is limited to the SWP and some people on Twitter.

Nice use of "yoof" there. Like the only unemployed are thick inner city kids who don't want jobs anyway.

Pre-liberalisation, before the decriminalisation of homosexuality in the late 1960s, back when Mary Whitehouse types were influential, people tended to be judged by their attitude towards traditional institutions such as marriage and the family.

If you were pro-marriage, straight and wanted kids, you were Good – if you were anti-marriage, not perfectly straight or not particularly interested in procreating, then you were Bad, a deviant, possibly even mentally disordered. Today, such an elitist and narrow-minded judgement of an individual's worth, the instinct to check whether someone is properly conformist by finding out where he stands on marriage, is carried out by the so-called radicals rather than the traditionalists. Now it is the supposedly liberal classes who will shun you and ridicule you, question your reputation and even write you off as disordered, if you fail to kowtow to their favourite new institution: gay marriage. "Liberals" have become the defenders of narrow and conformist moral virtue, while their traditionalist critics are written off as deviants.

That explains a lot.
I always struggled to figure out whether the RCP were spoilers with an interest in marxism, or marxists with an interest in spoiling.
Some of the leading writers look to have coalesced around the "Spiked Online" website.

I don't know if you've ever seen the RCP's 'Preparing for Power' (lol) manifesto, but they were/are a bunch of delusional, cultish cranks.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/40531387/Prep ... d-Aug-1984

So people who support gay marriage don't like people when they oppose gay marriage.