It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 12:16 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:40 pm
Posts: 2807
Steve Doughty is* James Slack's sidekick. Hates immigrants and will make up any old bollocks about them, and has generally talked easily-disproven utter shit for a long time.

* or was a couple of years ago, I don't follow the mail much anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11867
Location: East London
Quote:
Or alternately the lesson is just don't treat your employees like shit in the first place.


yeah but, what about if someone takes offence at a harmless joke? etc etc


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 427
The Mail has published this correction to the Steve Doughty article on gay marriage:

Quote:
A recent article based on an Office for National Statistics report stated that most Britons still oppose gay marriage. While the ONS report did show that only a minority of Britons are in support of gay marriage, the more detailed statistics from the EU poll on which it was based suggest that the percentages for and against are about the same – 46% and 45% respectively – with a further 9% who ‘don’t know’. We are happy to clarify the position.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 9:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5380
Location: A town near the Sea
Err if "only a minority" is 46% then what would you describe 45% as?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 427
mattomac wrote:
Err if "only a minority" is 46% then what would you describe 45% as?


It's a classic correction where they try to pretend they were right all along.

Of course, in the original they said 'most' were against gay marriage. Now it's been pointed out what the actual figures were, 46% becomes a 'minority' and anyway there's not much between them. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:07 pm
Posts: 427
Mail refers today to 'Blatter's blunder' and says:

Quote:
The FIFA president is facing renewed demands for his resignation after dismissing on-pitch racism with an astonishing response.


And what did Doughty say about on-pitch racism on the Mail website a couple of weeks ago?

Quote:
So, Mr Evra and Mr Ferdinand, I know you feel insulted. But perhaps in this case you could just put up with it and get on with the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3349
Location: chesterfield
Love the irony in Doughty's latest article.

Bishops must learn that when they turn to politics, their arguments have to be backed up with evidence

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1eNm8EeGh

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2834
'Discrimination' in the queue for council housing, and the whinging of the white working class

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1fHvjr6Kq

What a cunt. (And let's all ignore for a moment the fact that Mail happily misreported the Joseph Rowntree Foundation's findings just the other day).

Quote:
White people in working class districts feel they are the last in line when it comes to handouts and need more sympathy from the state, according to a report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

The what? Yes, the Rowntree Foundation, a social research organisation launched on the back of the Quaker chocolate fortune, left-leaning.

You couldn't say that last part until a couple of years back, they would claim to be an entirely neutral charity and and sue you. But since their chief executive signed up as an adviser to Gordon Brown in Downing Street the left orientation has become harder to deny.

This from a paper which gleefully reports any old shit that the, oh so neutral, Tax Dogder's Alliance or Mediawatch feeds 'em.
Quote:
We could listen to Rowntree's advice to hand out state money with more 'transparency' and subsidise street festivals. But it might do more good just to tell the disaffected white poor: get a job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:14 pm
Posts: 3168
Quote:
Article doesn't contain enough of the facts.

- RROD, UK, 30/11/2011 23:24


Quite. Some facts here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8137408.stm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11867
Location: East London
What's so ridiculous about a business launching a charity with its profits?

Doesn't the right want more philanthropy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22966
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Rowntrees do have some form in that area...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12686
Location: Up my own arse.
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Rowntrees do have some form in that area...


Lovely fruitgums, though.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2834
At least the public sector strike gave us all a good laugh

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1fUKUlL00

Quote:
I may have given the impression that I thought the public sector workers' day of action was a bad idea. I may have suggested that that the strike would be unpopular.

I may have been mistaken. It was a lovely day.

It was fun to drive past my local university and watch the lecturers trying to picket it. Poor loves, they've spent whole careers trying to prove that sea levels are rising or to make microchips walk dogs, and they've never had the chance to go on a real strike before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22966
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
The Hidden Hand of Dacre™


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Steve Doughty
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7326
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
What's so ridiculous about a business launching a charity with its profits?

Doesn't the right want more philanthropy?


No, but they love talking about it...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 110 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group