It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:51 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 208  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5830
Location: Arslikan EU
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Of course not. It's just a twatting to put him back in his box.

BBC are reporting the plan as about Boris being re-elected, although he has greater ambitions.



Not fucking Prime Minister, I am off to Dignitas if that is the case.

_________________
"Fanaticism is the only form of willpower to which the weak minded and irresolute can rise."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Where shall we put an airport, so people can get to it easily? Kent.

He's as much a clown as Gove.

Neither of these two will be Prime Minister. Gove will come unstuck because he's dodgy. Johnson's schtick will wear thin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3942
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Where shall we put an airport, so people can get to it easily? Kent.

He's as much a clown as Gove.

Neither of these two will be Prime Minister. Gove will come unstuck because he's dodgy. Johnson's schtick will wear thin.


It hasn't so far. I do wonder whether today's announcement isn't in part due to Cameron slapping down a potential threat.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23626
Location: England - the old fashioned tolerant one.
Paul wrote:
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Of course not. It's just a twatting to put him back in his box.

BBC are reporting the plan as about Boris being re-elected, although he has greater ambitions.



Not fucking Prime Minister, I am off to Dignitas if that is the case.


Look at the Tory alternatives:
Pob
Bojo
Gideon
Foxx (he shits in my garden)
Cleggerooney
La Menschette

Now, choose. Go on, I dare you, choose.

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Why would they have to take over before about 2020? Anyone could emerge by then. Cameron had only been in Parliament 4 years in 2005.

Hague is the obvious one before then. He's worked his passage back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 13143
Location: Up my own arse.
You left out Lansley, Willetts and Davis. And Dorries. She'll be puttin her name forward, mark my words.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 12:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23626
Location: England - the old fashioned tolerant one.
Aaargh.

The Tories are getting fractious about Camerooney. There's still time, the backwoodsmen think, to get rid of him and get a proper right-winger (like Foxx) in before the next election, where they will ditch the LibDims, put forward a manifesto slightly to the right of the Nuremberg Decrees and win a landslide for feudalism and no state support for anybody, the reintroduction of hanging and non-optional Black Death.

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3942
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Why would they have to take over before about 2020? Anyone could emerge by then. Cameron had only been in Parliament 4 years in 2005.

Hague is the obvious one before then. He's worked his passage back.


They'll never take the risk of going back to a failed leader and one who made such a twat of himself on so many occasions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23626
Location: England - the old fashioned tolerant one.
Especially after the 'sharing a room' stuff. That may also count Foxx out in the shires, of course. As we are seeing at the moment, homophobia (or general intolerance) is alive and well in the Nasty Party.

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3942
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Especially after the 'sharing a room' stuff. That may also count Foxx out in the shires, of course. As we are seeing at the moment, homophobia (or general intolerance) is alive and well in the Nasty Party.


And that's before http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL_p9qjfu5U


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5460
Location: A town near the Sea
Would they win without Cameron? I can't see it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3942
mattomac wrote:
Would they win without Cameron? I can't see it.


They believe they won* last time despite him.



*I know, you know...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5460
Location: A town near the Sea
davidjay wrote:
mattomac wrote:
Would they win without Cameron? I can't see it.


They believe they won* last time despite him.



*I know, you know...


It's just every bit of polling you care to look at makes him far more positive than the rest of his party, I basically can't see why I guess it's this idea of being Prime minsterial.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:26 pm
Posts: 50
Location: Hull
Ripped from the today's popbitch e-mail

Quote:
Big Questions <<
What people are asking this week

According to an ex-girlfriend, which
yacht and bible loving cabinet minister
kept a curious jazz mag collection under
his bed?


:lol: :lol:

_________________
Wars of religion always make me laugh because basically you're fighting over who has the best imaginary friend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Michael Gove
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
They're using the classic Tory reasoning of "we aren't winning because we aren't being right-wing enough", completely failing to realise that the whole point of Cameron dragging them nearer the centre in the years up to 2010 (see also Blair / Kinnock) is because the more extreme you are the less people will vote for you.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 ... 208  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group