It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 3:53 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Seeing that I can't read those Telegraph people, can someone tell me? Does their defence amount to anything more than "lots of people have expressed an interest in the free school". Does it query the surplus places argument?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2898
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Seeing that I can't read those Telegraph people, can someone tell me? Does their defence amount to anything more than "lots of people have expressed an interest in the free school". Does it query the surplus places argument?

This is Toby Young's piece in full:
Quote:
There's a disgraceful attempt to smear Katharine Birbalsingh in this morning's Observer. Under the headline "Katharine Birbalsingh criticised over 'wasteful' free school project", the paper's policy editor Daniel Boffey tries to create the impression that there's growing local opposition to the Michaela Community School – Birbalsingh's free school – which is due to open in Wandsworth this September.

The article is misleading in three respects.

First, Boffey refers to Jane Eades, the leader of the opposition to the new school, as a "retired teacher from Wandsworth". What he neglects to mention is that she is one of the national organisers of the Anti-Academies Alliance, an organisation with close ties to the Socialist Workers' Party. This is a bit like quoting Christine Blower saying something against Michael Gove's education reforms and describing her as "a former modern languages teacher" rather than the General Secretary of the NUT.

Second, Boffey uncritically regurgitates one of the key bits of misinformation being disseminated by the Anti-Academies Alliance and its Trotskyist allies, namely, that there isn't any need for a new secondary school in Wandsworth and, as a result, the Department for Education is wasting precious resources that would be better spent elsewhere. In support of this view, Boffey points out that "official figures" show that there will be a "surplus" of 2,000 secondary school places in the borough once the Michaela Community School has opened. What he fails to point out is that the proposed site for the new school is on the Lambeth border and in Lambeth there's a huge shortage of secondary school places. Indeed, Birbalsingh originally wanted to set the school up in Lambeth but was unable to do so thanks to the opposition of the left-wingers – officers and councillors – who control the local authority.

Third, Boffey reproduces another of the smears being put about by the Anti-Academies Alliance which is that the school's proposed site is currently home to 400 local businesses and that the opening of the school will inevitably lead to job losses. Again, he's left out a crucial bit of information which is that the owners of the site in question – the Trident Centre – have signalled their intention to sell it willy nilly. Consequently, if it isn't bought by the Department for Education, it will just be sold to a developer and the 400 business will have to move out in any case.

Katharine Birbalsingh is an experienced and hard-working teacher who has dedicated her life to public service. The reason she's being targeted by the hard left in South London is because she had the temerity to criticise state education at the 2010 Conservative Party conference and is therefore regarded as an apostate. Next time a journalist from the Observer or the Guardian writes about her, he or she should take the trouble to find out the whole story and not just obediently trot out the lines being disseminated by the Socialist Workers' Party and its various fronts.

And here is a section from Birbalsingh's:
Quote:
We hope to attract a mixed multicultural and multiclass intake of children from Wandsworth, Lambeth and Merton because we are on the border of all three boroughs. South London has a massive shortage of secondary places, confirmed by all the statistics. By Lambeth’s own admission, South Lambeth is the worst hit for secondary places. Many of Wandsworth's schools are selective. We are going to be one of the few Wandsworth schools that will not be selective in any way, and the only one that will be taking a banded intake in order to ensure we get a truly comprehensive intake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:10 pm
Posts: 606
Location: London
It's true that there is a shortage of of school places in Lambeth, but the shortage is in the north of ther borough not the south, the children in Lambeth that would benifit would all be over an hour by bus from Tooting.

_________________
"..The Daily Mail - not so much a newspaper as an idiot's guidebook issued in bite-size daily installments" Charlie Brooker


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
The first point is bollocks. You're not an ex-teacher if you're in organisation with some people Young doesn't like?

On the face of it he has a point about the surplus places. That is assuming anyone from Lambeth is admitted.

The third point- it's not at all certain that the building would be sold immediately or that the new owner would choose to kick everyone out and look for new tenants. This being a recession and all.

So, usual standard stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23618
Location: England - the old fashioned tolerant one.
Wandsworth is awash with secondary places, especially after the council opened an extra school a few years back.

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Katherine Birbalsingh in May last year did a Q&A about the new school

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/katha ... e-schools/

Quote:
Is it true that Lambeth has a shortage of school places?
YES. Hundreds of Lambeth school children are schooled outside the borough, with many having to travel across the river.


So hundreds, and not thousands. And crossing the river suggests, as said upthread, the shortage is up the other end of the borough.

And it seems from elsewhere the main problem is with primary places.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: London
And a number of parents send their kids to schools outside Lambeth out of choice, not because of a shortage of places. Plus they have quite a high proportion of children with SEN who go to specialist schools in other areas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
I'd missed that comment, Fozzy. Interesting. Do you have a link?

In the meantime:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/201 ... ol-opening

Quote:
Birbalsingh had planned to open a secondary school, the Michaela community school, in Tooting, south London, this September, but she has failed to secured her preferred location. The school may open next year instead.

In a statement, Birbalsingh said she was faced with a "very difficult situation", but had to take a decision to defer the opening of the school so parents could apply to other schools for next year.


Doesn't look like she could run a whelk stall- with no offence intended to the real Tubby Isaacs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: London
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
I'd missed that comment, Fozzy. Interesting. Do you have a link?

Sorry, no. It's based on personal experience - I worked for quite a long time in the Lambeth area, and still do some work for people from there, and therefore gained quite extensive knowledge of local schools and the iniquities of the council's education department.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Katherine Birbalsingh
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
That's fine. Sounds plausible.

As others have pointed out, aren't these schools supposed to be driven by local groups? What we have is Birbalsingh flailing around looking for somewhere to set up her "baby".


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group