It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 5:25 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 378 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:45 am
Posts: 4386
Location: The woods outside the big society
Anyone else catch her laying into Dianne Abbott on Newsnight last night?

_________________
Mailwatch. Love us or leave us.
http://www.coalitionofresistance.org.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12750
Location: Up my own arse.
The Red Arrow wrote:
Anyone else catch her laying into Dianne Abbott on Newsnight last night?


Nah, was watching Dimbers and guests. Surely Abbott handed her her arse?

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12750
Location: Up my own arse.
Does anybody have any idea what Mad Nad is on about in this morning's Tweet?

Quote:
Cameron is sleepwalking into the mother of all back bench rows if he thinks he can let FU nations use the ECJ without recourse to parliament.


I don't think she's got the hang of Twitter.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Last edited by Abernathy on Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23068
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
1) Absolutely no idea - could mean anything or nothing.
2) Name 3 21st century concepts of which she has any sort of grasp.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7342
I'll guess ECJ is European Courts of Justice.

FU Nations?? I keep thinking of that daft French Connection logo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23068
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Perhaps it's a typo for EU?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:47 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10523
Location: Durham
I assumed it was deliberate as an 'hilarious' joke. FU = "Fuck You"

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23068
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I don't think the Nadster does jokes...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:59 pm
Posts: 5511
Location: London
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Perhaps it's a typo for EU?

I thought that, but it still makes no sense as it's not up to Cameron to decide whether to let EU nations use the ECJ. I suspect that, as with most of what Nad says, we'll have to give up the battle to try to import any meaning into it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:05 pm
Posts: 309
I think she means Financial Union - ie the other 26 nations who agreed a financial stability pact. Cameron made a big thing about how, because it wasnt an EU treaty, they couldnt use EU institutions to enforce it - a pledge that he's been backing away from since the moment he made it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7342
visage wrote:
I think she means Financial Union - ie the other 26 nations who agreed a financial stability pact. Cameron made a big thing about how, because it wasnt an EU treaty, they couldnt use EU institutions to enforce it - a pledge that he's been backing away from since the moment he made it.


Give that man a coconut!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23068
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Fiscal Union.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15997784

Merkel urges euro fiscal union to tackle debt crisis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12750
Location: Up my own arse.
Jeebus.

Quote:
Is Rachel (Reeves) going to be the only woman on #newsnight? Could it be two progs on the trot with just one woman #sexistbbc


Sexist BBC?

Somebody please lock this ridiculous woman in a crate.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:18 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11935
Location: East London
Jesus. Seeing she mentioned Rachel Reeves, she must be meaning political figures. Whose fault is it there aren't more women?

What would Nad and her mates say if the BBC didn't bother with ministers/shadow ministers and hauled in a woman off the select committee?

Gone political mad correctness- rearrange.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mad Nad
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4260
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
Abernathy wrote:
Jeebus.

Quote:
Is Rachel (Reeves) going to be the only woman on #newsnight? Could it be two progs on the trot with just one woman #sexistbbc


Sexist BBC?

Somebody please lock this ridiculous woman in a crate.


A mere two episodes with only one woman is all it takes for the BBC to be sexist now.
The BBC would have to have a majority female (or preferably all female) cast or panel on every single show before some would even begin to consider it non-sexist any more.

It's not as if there have been no women on the show for months - and frankly if the alternative is to have an utter spunksock like her on I'd rather no women at all.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 378 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: oboogie and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group