It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 8:35 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Single Issue Threads

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 7
  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Abernathy
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12642
Location: Up my own arse.
Who was it that said that if the riots were caused by parents not physically disciplining their kids, then they must be knocking seven bells out of their nippers up in Kensington and Chelsea?

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.
Top
 Profile  
 
Malcolm Armsteen
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
David Lammy.

Or Lampy.
Top
 Profile  
 
Abernathy
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12642
Location: Up my own arse.
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
David Lammy.

Or Lampy.


No. Surely not?

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.
Top
 Profile  
 
Arnold
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6714
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
'I'm a figure of hate': Single mother of 14 slams critics who brand her a scrounger

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1l9PIquTg
Quote:
People were leaving messages on my Facebook page. There were over 100 comments and not one of them good.

Mailtards won't make comments like that. Ah..

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.
Top
 Profile  
 
oboogie
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10395
Location: Durham
Abernathy wrote:
Who was it that said that if the riots were caused by parents not physically disciplining their kids, then they must be knocking seven bells out of their nippers up in Kensington and Chelsea?

It was Laurie Penny in a debate on Channel 4 news on Sunday 29th January (I quoted her in the Politicians Swallowing The Mail's Agenda thread which may be where you read it).

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...
Top
 Profile  
 
Arnold
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6714
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Lesbian lovers both become mothers after getting pregnant by the SAME sperm donor

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1mMpvrvtq
Quote:
Why are you expecting any rational, open-minded and moral person to be 'shocked' by this? this is the 21st century, DM. Gay pride, world wide!

- Laurence, Grantham, 14/2/2012 13:03
Click to rate Rating 17

Quote:
..........OH DEAR ,OH DEAR !

- I fear for the future , of the human race , 14/2/2012 12:57
Click to rate Rating 31

Quote:
What a pathetic country we live in.

- Jason , Bizarre England, 14/2/2012 12:53
Click to rate Rating 25

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.
Top
 Profile  
 
ezinra
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 5:43 pm
Posts: 3855
Location: Chuffing Barsetshire
Quote:
Lesbian lovers Kirsty Cox and Anna Jones have both become mothers after DIY artificial insemination from the same sperm donor.

The married couple are bringing up three-month-old Scarlett Marie and Alfie, who are half brother and sister to each other.

While it's positive that the Mail calls them a "married couple", I can't imagine it describing Posh & Becks as "straight lovers".

"DIY artificial insemination" is a very oblique way to describe what I imagine to be a fairly blunt procedure.

The Mailites think the couple look alike because they have similar hair (presumably styled by the sperm donor). Coz gays just fancy themselves, innit?
Top
 Profile  
 
Malcolm Armsteen
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
My son was about to be a sperm donor to a lesbian couple (not married) but it didn't happen when they split up. I was quite happy with the idea, but Mrs Armsteen wasn't, as she said she would effectively have a grandchild that she would never meet and never know anything about. Another son did point out that this was probably the case already, but she was genuinely unhappy about the idea.

Funny business, genetics.
Top
 Profile  
 
Arnold
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6714
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Forget mother and father: 'Parents could be re-named Progenitors A and B' under plans for gay marriage

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1p6DpDhfC
Quote:
A leading lawyer said, if the institution of marriage is redefined, the erosion of traditional words such as 'mother' and 'father' from British law could have 'Orwellian' consequences.

An impartial legal opinion then. Oh dear.

Quote:
Lord Brennan QC, an opponent of same sex marriage, also claimed the removal of such words from the statute books could result in legislative chaos.

Ah.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.
Top
 Profile  
 
Arnold
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6714
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Gay couple had two children from 'different racial backgrounds in mix-up at IVF clinic'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1tSMab2M5
Quote:
This whole scene is quite wrong and should NOT be happening.

- John German, Berlin. G, 29/4/2012 17:34
Click to rate Rating 52

Quote:
Gays should not be allowed to have IVF children.

- Casey, Maine, US, 29/4/2012 17:27
Click to rate Rating 16

Quote:
jackie , hertfordshire, 29/04/2012 16:01 I agree with you 100%, when you realise you are gay not being a father/ mother goes along with it. Children deserve a mother and a father, not two dads or two mums.

- Sharne, Clapham, SW London, 29/4/2012

Quote:
Jackie from Hertfordshire.... So gay people are unsuitable parents? Go back to the middle ages, please.

- ratgirl999, London, 29/4/2012 17:11
Click to rate Rating 25

Sensible comment red-arrowed by cunts.
Quote:
which is why you shouldn't mess with nature

- Karen, England, 29/4/2012 17:02
Click to rate Rating 238

Quote:
This is all so wrong. What does it say about this 'couple' that they have an issue with the race of one of their children when the far bigger issue is the question of whether two men should be entitled to bring up children in the first place. If two men want to be together then that is their concern but bringing children into the equation is just unethical.

- Kate, Epsom, 29/4/2012 17:26
Click to rate Rating 102

If they were both men, why did they need a sperm donor?

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.
Top
 Profile  
 
Timbo
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 2725
Location: N Wales Compound, EUKSSR
Arnold wrote:
If they were both men, why did they need a sperm donor?

Elf'n'safety?

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity
Top
 Profile  
 
Arnold
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6714
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
NHS remove word 'Dad' from pregnancy handbook in case it offends same sex couples

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1w6THMDNE

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.
Top
 Profile  
 
Malcolm Armsteen
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 22888
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Quite rightly...

I see we now have a Scottish branch of the TaxDodger's Alliance. That's nice.
Top
 Profile  
 
Bones McCoy
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 7:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7319
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
Quite rightly...

I see we now have a Scottish branch of the TaxDodger's Alliance. That's nice.


And there was me thinking that the Scots don't pay any tax.
Merely living the high life funded by England's magnanimous Barnett formula.
Top
 Profile  
 
Arnold
 Post subject: Re: The Mail vs non-traditional families
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6714
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
Lesbian couple who both had babies with SAME sperm donor 'cut off contact after he refused to give them more children'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z21MJhmDC8

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 5 of 7
  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Board index » Single Issue Threads

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group