Richard Littlejohn

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:07 am

Maybe next week he'll be lending some support to the foul-mouthed Dacre over his appearance before Leveson.

crabcakes_windermere · **Joined:** Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm **Posts:** 2079

Quote:

The other day while in town, I saw a young chap coming out of the job centre. No indication of what he was doing, how long he'd been out of work, or whether he was on benefits. He could have been on his way to an interview, just going in for the first time, or going to advertise a job. He could even have been employed there. Regardless, he was just minding his own business. And somebody from a passing car shouted "****ing scum scrounger!" at him. Certain people now automatically assume anyone poor is on the make, giving them a boogeyman to hate and conveniently taking the heat off of bankers, chancellors who let off big corporations from billions of tax (you remind us of GB's unfortunate-in-hindsight gold sales of years ago almost weekly, yet nothing on GO's fully aware loophole blind spots that are costing us all £££££'s right now - how come?)
- CM Burns, Windscale, 03/2/2012 09:40

Heavily edited to knock off the first sentence "Congratulations, Richard - mission accomplished." and the last sentence "and fat, lazy, overpaid, overseas tax dodgers. Proud of yourself?".

(Entirely true story, by the way)

bob_roberts · **Joined:** Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:20 pm **Posts:** 52

Littlejohn's disciples are at it again! Vote for Wob I say!

http://www.dont-start-me-off.com/CelebI ... MENTS=true

shyamz · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:36 pm

crabcakes_windermere wrote:

Quote:

The other day while in town, I saw a young chap coming out of the job centre. No indication of what he was doing, how long he'd been out of work, or whether he was on benefits. He could have been on his way to an interview, just going in for the first time, or going to advertise a job. He could even have been employed there. Regardless, he was just minding his own business. And somebody from a passing car shouted "****ing scum scrounger!" at him. Certain people now automatically assume anyone poor is on the make, giving them a boogeyman to hate and conveniently taking the heat off of bankers, chancellors who let off big corporations from billions of tax (you remind us of GB's unfortunate-in-hindsight gold sales of years ago almost weekly, yet nothing on GO's fully aware loophole blind spots that are costing us all £££££'s right now - how come?)
- CM Burns, Windscale, 03/2/2012 09:40

Heavily edited to knock off the first sentence "Congratulations, Richard - mission accomplished." and the last sentence "and fat, lazy, overpaid, overseas tax dodgers. Proud of yourself?".

(Entirely true story, by the way)

Sadly to some people we will always be f*****g scum scroungers. Until one of their own family has to sign on, then the cunts change their tune. It's almost enough to make you wish for unemployment to hit these indefenceably awful people's families - almost but not quite (I'd feel sorry for the poor family member who'd have to suffer the indignity of going to that awful place to be looked down on like scum, just to make a point to their cuntish relative).

DTR · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:43 pm

shyamz wrote:

crabcakes_windermere wrote:

Quote:

The other day while in town, I saw a young chap coming out of the job centre. No indication of what he was doing, how long he'd been out of work, or whether he was on benefits. He could have been on his way to an interview, just going in for the first time, or going to advertise a job. He could even have been employed there. Regardless, he was just minding his own business. And somebody from a passing car shouted "****ing scum scrounger!" at him. Certain people now automatically assume anyone poor is on the make, giving them a boogeyman to hate and conveniently taking the heat off of bankers, chancellors who let off big corporations from billions of tax (you remind us of GB's unfortunate-in-hindsight gold sales of years ago almost weekly, yet nothing on GO's fully aware loophole blind spots that are costing us all £££££'s right now - how come?)
- CM Burns, Windscale, 03/2/2012 09:40

Heavily edited to knock off the first sentence "Congratulations, Richard - mission accomplished." and the last sentence "and fat, lazy, overpaid, overseas tax dodgers. Proud of yourself?".

(Entirely true story, by the way)

Sadly to some people we will always be f*****g scum scroungers. Until one of their own family has to sign on, then the cunts change their tune. It's almost enough to make you wish for unemployment to hit these indefenceably awful people's families - almost but not quite (I'd feel sorry for the poor family member who'd have to suffer the indignity of going to that awful place to be looked down on like scum, just to make a point to their cuntish relative).

Even then that won't change anything. The cunt in question will just believe that they (or the family member) are just down on their luck and entitled to JSA, "i've paid into the system all my life" ect. They'll still think everyone else in the job centre is a 'scrounger'

Tubby Isaacs · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:21 pm

As Chris Mullin says in his diaries "worked all my life" isn't to be taken too literally. One bloke who says it to him is 41.

Tubby Isaacs · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:24 pm

bob_roberts wrote:

Littlejohn's disciples are at it again! Vote for Wob I say!

http://www.dont-start-me-off.com/CelebI ... MENTS=true

What a bunch of cunts on that site.

Tubby Isaacs · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:49 pm

Like this one:

Quote:

To me, feminism is a non-topic and exists purely to give insecure and bitter women a common cause.

On a discussion about how awful Laurie Penny is. Who couldn't prefer a drink with the erudite "Shower of Piss" eh?

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3823

DTR wrote:

Even then that won't change anything. The cunt in question will just believe that they (or the family member) are just down on their luck and entitled to JSA, "i've paid into the system all my life" ect. They'll still think everyone else in the job centre is a 'scrounger'

Excuse me if I 'm repeating an old story, but during the Miners Strike I was doing my Solidarity bit at the place where I worked, trying to organise some support for the strikers. I might as well have been asking my fellow employees to help fund child abuse. The most common response was "There's plenty of jobs for anybody who wants one," followed by "They don't want to work anyway." This was a Community Programme for the long-term unemployed, in a region decimated by factory closures.

shyamz · **Posted:** Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:39 pm

Doesn't suprise me, you'd be amazed how cuntish some employed people become when life puts the unemployed right in their faces - as if our very existence threatens their own jobs, or as if we are as repellant to them as drug dealers or the homeless.

Tubby Isaacs · **Posted:** Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:15 am

It's another example of how they wouldn't like things the way they think they would.

How many of these complacent fuckwits have been in their job for ages and have got some way up the payscale? Abolish all that silly employment law that's stopping people hiring and firing... and lo! the first thing the boss does is ship them out and put some sharp young graduate in for half the money.

But, I didn't mean me!

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3823

shyamz wrote:

Doesn't suprise me, you'd be amazed how cuntish some employed people become when life puts the unemployed right in their faces - as if our very existence threatens their own jobs, or as if we are as repellant to them as drug dealers or the homeless.

Just to clear it up for anyone who wasn't around then, if you were on a CP you had to have been unemployed for at least six months. These were people who had been out of work for at least that long within the previous year and still clung to the fucking Sun-inspired myth that the unemployed (except them of course) could have got jobs if they'd wanted.

The Red Arrow · **Posted:** Mon Feb 06, 2012 7:52 pm

Come on then, Dickie - let's see your response to Papa Doc's abysmal performance. :lol:

satnav · **Posted:** Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:06 pm

I'm guessing he will try and claim that newspaper editors are being treated like criminals whilst terrorists are allowed to roam the streets unchecked.

satnav · **Posted:** Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:56 pm

I'm sure that Daycare told Leveson today that thew Mail only recruited the very best journalists in the business, so how does he explain this garbage.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2097403/Rollover-time-benefit-lottery.html

Tens of thousands of people will suffer as a result of welfare reform so Littlejohn devotes over half his column to the Lottery story the paper ran on Saturday. Littlejohn reassures he band of followers that people who are genuinely disabled will not suffer as a result of these benefit cuts so he is claiming he knows better than all the experts and the charities who work on a daily basis with disabled people.

Richard Littlejohn

Who is online