C**t of the day

Abernathy · **Posted:** Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:23 pm

And that's way before you even get the fact that not all women are beautiful creatures.

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3813

Return of an old faithful:

Quote:

shame the women are a bit fat
- john, london, 6/2/2012 13:55

Kreuzberger · **Posted:** Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:27 am

Abernathy wrote:

And that's way before you even get the fact that not all women are beautiful creatures.

spoonman · **Joined:** Tue May 11, 2010 2:27 pm **Posts:** 889

oboogie wrote:

I wonder how selectively Noel Gallagher is being reported. The headline certainly doesn't match the text.
I think what he actually meant is that in the Eighties there was still some hope left, in-spite of Thatcher. Some people, like him, who were condemned by the Tories to a life on the dole were less apathetic than now and were motivated to go off do something and "great art was made". Thirty years later, their children are even more downtrodden and have had the motivation beaten out of them.

The government we have now is far more extreme than then and I don't believe that even the most cynical on the Left foresaw just how devastating the consequences of Thatcherism would be. Then there was a Labour opposition who offered a real alternative, now we have a Labour party which has accepted most of the changes which Thatcher introduced - so of course there's less hope around now. In that sense I agree with Gallagher, the Eighties were less shit than now.

I got the feeling reading that to, I reckon Noel Gallagher has been "Clarksoned" to an extent. The culture, society and age of the 80's is quite different to now and I think there is just a sense of helplessness in many young people today. At least in the 80's music was a popular outlet for that which sold bucketloads of singles and albums and with the likes of TOTP and the Tube you could make your performance stand out.

I do know in an interview Noel Gallagher did say that he moved to London because there were too many people he knew in the local pub he visited and if brought a round of drinks for everyone there he was deemed a flash bastard. If he got drinks just for himself and whoever he was with at the time he got called a scrooge for not treating there. He couldn't win and so moved away.

I've never hard either of the Gallagers had anything much positive to say about Thatcher, got this from wikipedia...

Quote:

In an interview in 2007 when asked about politics he said, "I'd been unemployed all my life. It was a big deal for me when he [Tony Blair] got in. Now David Cameron is no different than our Tony Blair and Gordon Brown is no different than our David Cameron. They're all cut from the same cloth and it annoys me that the biggest political icon in the last 30 years has been Margaret Thatcher, and she's a dick. Someone who tried to destroy the working class. It freaks me out. So I don't really think there's anything left to vote for. I believe that I, as a person, can only change things once every 5 years and that's by voting, and my point is that even casting that vote means that the same guy gets in, the only difference is one has a red tie and the other has a blue one. That's all it means, so I think that I should start the Gallagher Party."

oboogie · **Posted:** Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:19 am

It's also personal, the Gallaghers got played royally by Blair in the Cool Britannia days of '97, they eventually realised and felt cheated.

sporran · **Joined:** Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm **Posts:** 1583

Not the Mail, but you can bet Mad Mel and co will be all over this so I'd like to make a group nomination for this page:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-de ... _111678430

The beeb felt it necessary to specifically point out:

Quote:

However, the case was not won on human rights grounds, but on a point of statutory construction of local government legislation.

Not that it'll stop the likes of this cunt blaming it anyway:

Quote:

2. BMT - An - Alternative
Yet again the Human Rights Act used for entirely the wrong purpose.Time for the govt to pull out of the ECHR and bring in our own Bill of Rights.Its getting to be a joke the way human rights is used constantly in all matters legal and criminal.It wasn't designed for this sort of use.People need to start to remember that with rights come responsibility.You can't have one without the other.

And, predictably, dragging the muslims into it:

Quote:

6. One in a million
What is the world coming to! Will they now ban muslims from shouting out from their minarets? Thought not....

sporran · **Joined:** Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:10 pm **Posts:** 1583

For balance, plenty of cunts on the other side aswell:

Quote:

175. Serk

There is no place in this world for organised religion anymore. Public praying should be banned and churches, mosques, synagogues and any other type of religious building should be converted to social housing for the poor. Religion is a drug and it should be categorised as a class A along with Heroin and Crack.

Abernathy · **Posted:** Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:29 pm

I'm nominating Simon Burns MP - a junior health minister appearing on the box today to defend the H&SC bill - and making a right cunt of it, too.

He is virtually an identikit Tory MP straight from Central Casting, lacking only the flecks of spittle around his flabby gob :

oboogie · **Posted:** Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:51 pm

Not the commenter but the 66(net) people who think we should hang 13 year olds.

Quote:

I agree Preddie is probably a nasty piece of work, but the comments on here saying he should have been executed are equally nasty. He was a child when he commited his offence. As the UK is a civilised country, we don't execute children,
- Frank, Bristol, 10/2/2012 14:47
Click to rate Rating 66

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1m0hgyynA

ezinra · **Posted:** Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:51 pm

Quote:

"More white men have also been found to marry East Asian women - compared to Asian men marrying white women." The real reason is that tatooed, swearing, bed-hopping, white women are unattractive to all men, whereas asian women with better manners, speech, and morals, are more attrictive to all men.

- Mike, England, 10/2/2012 22:05 Rating 17

Class, race and gender prejudice in one sentence, with a supplement of condescension, machismo, bad spelling and general cuntness.

Northerly Swell · **Posted:** Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:07 pm

Quote:

Class, race and gender prejudice in one sentence, with a supplement of condescension, machismo, bad spelling and general cuntness.

Are you talking about Mike, England or the Daily Mail in general?

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:43 pm

ezinra wrote:

Quote:

"More white men have also been found to marry East Asian women - compared to Asian men marrying white women." The real reason is that tatooed, swearing, bed-hopping, white women are unattractive to all men, whereas asian women with better manners, speech, and morals, are more attrictive to all men.

- Mike, England, 10/2/2012 22:05 Rating 17

Class, race and gender prejudice in one sentence, with a supplement of condescension, machismo, bad spelling and general cuntness.

The only thing that surprises me there is that Mike isn't one of their many correspondents from Thailand. I expect he's still saving for the airfare. He'll probably have more success with women who can't understand a word that he's saying.

shyamz · **Posted:** Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:09 am

ezinra wrote:

Quote:

"More white men have also been found to marry East Asian women - compared to Asian men marrying white women." The real reason is that tatooed, swearing, bed-hopping, white women are unattractive to all men, whereas asian women with better manners, speech, and morals, are more attrictive to all men.

- Mike, England, 10/2/2012 22:05 Rating 17

Class, race and gender prejudice in one sentence, with a supplement of condescension, machismo, bad spelling and general cuntness.

Those aren't the reasons. There are other reasons why there are more white men married to asian women than the other way round, and I'm sure Mike knows what they are.

Gourami · **Joined:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm **Posts:** 2005

Meet the world's 'fattest man' who lives in London: 58-stone Keith is so huge he needs 18 carers to keep him alive
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments

Some poor chap who began eating compulsively after his Mum died and is now housebound.

Quote:

the question has to be asked- what is the point of keeping him alive?

- Simon, Cardiff, 12/2/2012 15:01

Hmm. Perhaps because he is a human being Simon, one who has had difficulties? The headline is rather sinister too. Do headlines usually specify that carers are there to keep people alive? Carers often do keep people alive but why single out this aspect of their role? I'm a cynic but I wonder about a subtext - let's save all that money, get rid of the carers wages by getting rid of him.

shyamz · **Posted:** Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:07 pm

I think the number of carers he has has something to do with it.

They want people to be angry about how much money it costs to pay that many care staff, not taking into account wether this is all the staff who have to visit him on a weekly basis, or the total number of staff who have been employed on and off to care for him over the past few months.

Weight is always the fat person's fault (according to the mail and it's readers). They don't deserve help or sympathy - and if they can be percieved to be costing a lot of money (your tax money of course) to be helped...well that's even worse - that could be spent on schools or roads, or on catching paedos.

By the sound of it, it seems this story is if anything a testament to the greater level of importance that should be placed on mental healthcare in the UK, and in making sure more is done to remove the stigma of asking for emotional help if someone feels they need it (particularly for men, many of whom are still lead to believe it is weak or humiliating to ask for such help).

C**t of the day

Who is online