It is currently Wed Apr 23, 2014 8:31 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next

When will he resign?
Poll ended at Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:55 pm
Sunday (today) 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Monday (tomorrow) 100%  100%  [ 11 ]
Total votes : 11

Re: Liam Fox

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 7182
Location: Gunchester
Michael White's takedown of Fox is worth a read. Fox is almost certainly arrogant enough to think he has a chance of replacing Cameron as Tory leader, despite being absolutely discredited to everyone except for a few desperate hard-right headbangers on the backbenches.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012 ... hael-white

Quote:
What makes Fox's intervention interesting – it's enough to stimulate an FT frontpage on a slow news day in Fleet St – is two-fold.

Firstly, it signals a return to active politics after his undignified resignation as defence secretary, which means David Cameron has another problem to worry about on his right flank: a vain former rival who clearly thinks he has the makings of the post-Cameron party leader.

I rate his chances only slightly higher than my own. Fox has always had a high opinion of his own intelligence and political capacity than would appear justified by the "contextual data" (I have adopted Professor Les Ebdon's phrase for my own purposes). In his defence cuts he left us with no aircraft carrier (which puts today's loose talk about bombing Somali pirates in its place) and no suitable planes to fly from them when/if we do get a new one.

As shadow health secretary, Dr Fox's "passport" scheme for patients to carry NHS cash into the private sector so frightened Cameroon Tories who wanted to win the coming election that Andrew Lansley was installed in the job as a "safe pair of hands". It's as scary as that.

So, secondly, there is the substance of his attack. What's Fox up to? It isn't all daft, the timing isn't great but he isn't all wrong either. He's right to highlight Britain's poor export-orientated performance despite a 25% devaluation of sterling against the euro, far feebler in Asia than countries Fox says "we deride" (speak for yourself, matey) such as Ireland, Spain or even Greece. He's also entitled to fret about UK inflation – it's almost a sexual fetish on the Tory right, you catch it when he writes of "the debauchery of our currency". Oooh, get him! Deflation also lurks: we're none of us sure quite what's going on.

I don't see much holding back exporters except, well, exporters who get less appreciation than they deserve from the rest of us.

But, as with my sore throat and headache, it's Fox's remedies that are scary. Britain's AAA rating (touch wood) has brought us time, he argues; time that should be used to further cut back state activity which has grown (mainly thanks to the banking bust Liam) and to use the proceeds of further cuts (he bravely does not specify where) to reduce employers national insurance contributions (Nics), hopefully to boost employment, especially among the young.

That's OK, too, though worse than useless as advice since it doesn't provide Osborne with a roadmap, only a "Hey, look at me" wave.

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:52 pm
Posts: 4071
Location: Dirty XBerg 36
A cracking find, New P - ( even if your avatar leaves me deeply unsettled.)

_________________
Selbstgerechte Fotze


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 7182
Location: Gunchester
There's another good post from some Smith Institute geezer debunking Fox's bullshit over at the New Statesman.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-s ... nt-minimum

Quote:
Just what should be done about unemployment, and in particular, youth unemployment? The right of the Conservative Party, most recently exemplified by Liam Fox's list of demands for the 2012 Budget, have a very simply answer: deregulate the labour market. And even commentators claiming to be on the left (George Eaton in the New Statesman) have suggested that the youth minimum wage should be frozen if the Low Pay Commission concludes that this would reduce youth unemployment.

What is most surprising perhaps is that these arguments should gain such currency at a time when the market fundamentalist model from which they draw inspiration has manifestly failed. The demand for light touch regulation of financial services (and indeed all markets) is what got us into this mess in the first place. The level of hypocrisy is staggering: senior executives must have access to undeserved colossal bonuses and salaries (because that's how the global market works apparently), but the most vulnerable in the labour market must see their wages cut and employment protection weakened.

The Tory right and their unwitting supporters on the left are essentially making zombie arguments. They have been defeated by evidence and experience but refuse to lie down and die. To begin with, the UK has one of the most lightly regulated labour markets of any major economy in the developed world. Only the USA has less protection for workers. Indeed, on almost every regulatory indicator that one could imagine, the UK emerges as a "liberal" economy. Despite the endless whining from the CBI and the small business lobby there is really very red tape left to cut. Of course, businesses -- and the Conservative Party -- always prefer less to more regulation. That is their ideological default setting. But the UK has now reached the point where another assault on employment rights or health and safety legislation will begin to remove necessary protections. David Cameron's own review, supervised by the Swedish academic Ragnar Lofstedt, concluded that there was no case for radically altering or stripping back current health and safety regulations, which he described as "fit for purpose". He also failed to find that EU regulations were in any sense gold-plated when transposed into UK law.

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
Michael White's been surprisingly good in his "at large" blogger role.

Lansley as a safe pair of hands- very funny.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
No mention of Liam Fox here, but he must be pretty implicated:

http://www.channel4.com/news/u-turn-on- ... -programme

Quote:
The prime minister has given Defence Secretary Phillip Hammond the green light to revert to the previous Labour administration's plans to buy the conventional jump-jet version of the F35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Their decision marks an about-turn in what had been a central plank of the coalition government's defence strategy. The government had announced in the defence review of 2010, that it would buy the F35 Joint Striker Fighter carrier version, rather than the jump-jet version.

The decision was keenly backed by Mr Cameron as it would have allowed Britain to operate more closely with France and the United States.


Supposedly £250m spunked on changing policy and changing it back.

Lot of public sector jobs you could save with that money, Foxy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
Fox cropped up in the FT again yesterday. Usual rubbish about workers' rights. And how it was important bad schools were allowed to fail.

Because of course you can extend other schools just like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
Foxy's back on the radar.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... other.html

Quote:
public records show that 27 MPs have now declared they are letting properties in London. The same MPs are also claiming rent from the taxpayer for properties in the capital.
The documents show that Dr Fox began claiming £1,971 a month in rent at the beginning of this year, shortly after letting his south London flat. Mr Fox does not rent from or let to another MP.


Even Grayling knocked this on the head after the furore last time. Shame to see Chris Bryant on there. Wonder if he'll get moved back to the backbenches? Fox is hopefully dead even as a stalking horse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 7182
Location: Gunchester
I'm more disappointed to see Linda Riordan creaming it, seeing as she is at least on the left of the party. Bryant is still a Blairite, after all. Still, Fox is utterly shameless.

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 4513
Location: chesterfield
How convenient for Liam Fox.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/oct/31/adam-werritty-fraud-dropped

_________________
http://tiny.cc/tqugax


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
Did i read the story right? Werritty didn't commit fraud because he didn't put Parliament's portcullis symbol on his business card?

I don't always trust the Guardian but that would seem very silly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 4513
Location: chesterfield
Anybody could go around carrying business cards claiming to be a ministerial adviser, the reason most people thought that Werrity was an adviser to Fox was because the two of them went everywhere together and because Werrity was allowed to attend meetings that he could only have attended if he was a minister, a civil servant or a special adviser. He seems to have avoided fraud charges mainly because it couldn't be proven that he had gained financially from his deception.

_________________
http://tiny.cc/tqugax


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
It wasn't about money though, was it? Not primarily.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 8520
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
It wasn't about money though, was it? Not primarily.


Do you always have to bring BUMSEX into it Tubby?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 16652
Location: East London
Liam Fox brought bum marriage into it today. Apparently not much demand for it.

Just like your unofficial defence policy, Liam.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Liam Fox
PostPosted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:56 pm
Posts: 7182
Location: Gunchester
Hilarious comments from Fox on boundary changes.

Quote:
Former Tory Defence Secretary Liam Fox branded Lib Dem MPs “deeply dishonourable” for rowing back on an earlier pledge to back the plan which would also slash the number of MPs from 650 to 600.

He added: “Who will trust them again?”


http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... eview.html

Hahahahaha.

_________________
Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group