We're All In This Together?

Abernathy · **Posted:** Sat Apr 07, 2012 9:53 pm

Right. I'd like to amputate both Vince Cable's legs, without any anaesthetic, then flay and burnish his two femurs into heavy clubs, with which I would then proceed to bludgeon David Cameron into a brutal, bloody, pain-filled death. In a piss-dungeon.

Gourami · **Joined:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm **Posts:** 2005

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

I'd like to bombard the Liberal Club with Eric Pickles from a trebuchet.

What a magnificent image that formed in my mind. I was almost there.

Gourami · **Joined:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm **Posts:** 2005

Althea wrote:

How about Eric Pickles with Sarah Teather?

Sadly, this conjured up a sex scene. Perhaps a fate worse than death for Ms. Teather though.

spoonman · **Joined:** Tue May 11, 2010 2:27 pm **Posts:** 889

Althea wrote:

How about Eric Pickles with Sarah Teather?

Gourami wrote:

Sadly, this conjured up a sex scene. Perhaps a fate worse than death for Ms. Teather though.

Probably something like what was said about Nicholas Soams, in that it was supposed to feel like a heavy wardrobe with a very small key fell on top of you.

Althea · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:52 am

I don't know, they'd make a sweet couple.

Sort of like Jabba and Princess Leia.

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 10:59 am

Princess Leia

Sarah Teather

Not seeing it myself...

Althea · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:03 am

Maybe she's more like Bib Fortuna, then, Jabba's Twi'lek assistant.

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:13 am

More like

Althea · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 11:18 am

I think that's insulting to Jar Jar.

Tubby Isaacs · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:03 pm

Teather is crying out for someone to do a porn fake of her.

Gourami · **Joined:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:51 pm **Posts:** 2005

At least in your head.

ponce on the heath · **Posted:** Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:14 pm

oboogie · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:42 pm

Only a couple of weeks ago I was joking about this.

Quote:

The former chair of Conservative Future has suggested that the unemployed should not be allowed to vote. Tom Bursnall, who recently defected from the Tories to UKIP on Windsor and Maidenhead Council, specifically targeted the unemployed people on his Pro Capitalist blog, asking:

“Should people on benefits be allowed to vote?”

And it gets worse — when “Batsh*t Bursnall” goes on to suggest that rich people should receive more votes than the poor:

“It would be terribly ‘unfair’ of you to give equal representation rights to the chap who contributes 50 times more than the next person. In the same way as if you own 60% of shares of a company, you’ll get 60% of the voting rights at the Annual General Meeting.”

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/04/t ... have-vote/

new puritan · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:53 pm

Torygraph hack Ian Cowie suggested something similar last year. To be fair, eliminating universal suffrage is just about the only way the right could scrape a majority these days.

Meanwhile...

Quote:

A former Conservative minister with close links to the Government is sitting as a peer in the House of Lords while simultaneously lobbying on behalf of a Caribbean tax haven.

Lord Blencathra, a former MP and Tory chief whip, is being paid by the Cayman Islands government to represent the interests of its financial services industry – despite also being able to vote on legislation affecting the territory.

Inquiries by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism and The Independent have established that Lord Blencathra has lobbied on behalf of the Caymans while claiming thousands of pounds in House of Lords attendance allowances.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 48252.html

The vermin in ermine epitomised.

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:06 pm

oboogie wrote:

Only a couple of weeks ago I was joking about this.

Quote:

The former chair of Conservative Future has suggested that the unemployed should not be allowed to vote. Tom Bursnall, who recently defected from the Tories to UKIP on Windsor and Maidenhead Council, specifically targeted the unemployed people on his Pro Capitalist blog, asking:

“Should people on benefits be allowed to vote?”

And it gets worse — when “Batsh*t Bursnall” goes on to suggest that rich people should receive more votes than the poor:

“It would be terribly ‘unfair’ of you to give equal representation rights to the chap who contributes 50 times more than the next person. In the same way as if you own 60% of shares of a company, you’ll get 60% of the voting rights at the Annual General Meeting.”

http://politicalscrapbook.net/2012/04/t ... have-vote/

Thick.
Incapable of understanding anything other than greed.

We're All In This Together?

Who is online