Messianic Trees wrote:
:D Perhaps they hate the Olympics more than the Beeb? Of course, as soon as the Olympics actually start, I suspect the Mail will be going on and on about how it's our patriotic duty to "sport our athletes".
sport our sporters
(sportsters, sportists).
Here's the odd thing about the Olyumpics though.
I love sport, I enjoy the olympics, I'm really looking forward to watching it this summer.
I'm of the left so am supposed to love government spending.
BUT
Whenever I hear some "Performance strategist" going on about elite athlete funding and the amount of cash being spent on getting
3 or 4 people really good at some incredibly obscure event, I find myself on teh side of the killjoys thinking "Why??".
Current estimate is that elite funding is going to cost several millions per Gold medal.
I appreciate the suggestion that a few more "heroes" will encourage participation.
I've never seen any firm evidence to back this.
A 3rd generation (Rubber granules and artificial grass tuft) sports pitch costs around a million pounds including lighting and an admin block with reception, parking 4 changing rooms each with showers and toilets.
I don't know how sticking a running track round the outside (A popular configuration) escalates the price, but I'd like to see a lot more of these about.
I'd argue that a Chris Hoy or Paula Radcliffe winning gold probably represents a lot of inspiration for your £2million.
I'd also argue that a Gold in Greco Roman Wrestling, YngLng Yachts or Handball is unlikely to shift many arses off sofas, cut back pot-noodle consumption or prevent Riots.
And how the hell are we supposed to interest disaffected teenage boys in an event called the Cockless Four?