We're All In This Together?

new puritan · **Posted:** Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:49 pm

Tory youth wings have long been renowned for attracting unpleasant fundamentalists, of course. Looks like Bursnall is yet to mature beyond that stage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation ... ontroversy

smod · **Posted:** Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:14 pm

I guess it can go here:

Althea · **Posted:** Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:55 pm

Looks like... Hmm... a 7 on the Bristol, I think.

Bones McCoy · **Joined:** Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am **Posts:** 7331

smod wrote:

I guess it can go here:

What does it mean? you have 2 sets of dates that disagree.

Althea · **Posted:** Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:09 pm

Bones McCoy wrote:

What does it mean? you have 2 sets of dates that disagree.

I think it means that the two other budgets would, overall, have put us in a better position, i.e. Labour were getting us out of the mess.

oboogie · **Posted:** Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:03 pm

Althea wrote:

Bones McCoy wrote:

What does it mean? you have 2 sets of dates that disagree.

I think it means that the two other budgets would, overall, have put us in a better position, i.e. Labour were getting us out of the mess.

That's not what it says though.

Althea · **Posted:** Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:04 pm

What does it say, then?

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:10 pm

Bones may disagree but it seems to me that it shows that Darling's last budget would have reduced the deficit slowly and steadily, as he promised at the time (2 parliaments to reduce it). The June 2010 data are Osborne's first budget, which shows the deficit being reduced more quickly (meaning more pain, unemployment etc.). It does, however, reduce the deficit. The last data set doesn't reduce the deficit as much.

However, I'm not seeing how the 2010 and 2012 budgets have data for 2009-10. It looks suspect to me, unless there is some more data to show the working.

oboogie · **Posted:** Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:29 am

Newcastle Tory election candidate stands down over Riba fraud claim.
A Conservative Tyneside local election candidate has stood down after he was dismissed as regional director of the Royal Institute of British Architects (Riba) amid fraud allegations
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-17767705

new puritan · **Posted:** Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:31 pm

As if this fucking clown hasn't done enough damage already.

Andrew Lansley backs lower pay for NHS staff in poorer areas

Quote:

Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, is threatening another controversial revolution in the NHS by proposing that its staff be paid less if they work in poorer parts of the country.

The cabinet minister is backing a plan for regional pay, which would mean that nurses, midwives, hospital porters, cleaners and paramedics would earn less if they work in the north or the Midlands rather than in the south of England. Official documents reveal that the only exemption backed by the Department of Health would be for highly paid managers working in new bodies established to deliver Lansley's controversial NHS reform programme, widely criticised as a privatisation of the health service.

The department, according to a submission to the NHS pay review body, believes special arrangements would be necessary for this new cohort of executives to "attract and retain high-calibre leaders and staff responsible for transforming delivery".

DTR · **Posted:** Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:59 pm

NHS pay was only really harmonised nationally relatively recently. 'Agenda for Change' has been an arse to implement, however the who point of the process was to stop the huge numbers of sideways moves by people who could get better pay for doing the same job in a diffrent trust as the staff turnover this generated (over a prolonged period) would have cost far far more than pay harmonisation has.

Arnold · **Posted:** Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:36 pm

Quote:

Has David Cameron's family got money tied up in offshore tax haven? Father revealed to have built up fortune using network of investment funds

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... funds.html

smod · **Posted:** Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:07 am

new puritan wrote:

As if this fucking clown hasn't done enough damage already.

Andrew Lansley backs lower pay for NHS staff in poorer areas

Quote:

Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, is threatening another controversial revolution in the NHS by proposing that its staff be paid less if they work in poorer parts of the country.

The cabinet minister is backing a plan for regional pay, which would mean that nurses, midwives, hospital porters, cleaners and paramedics would earn less if they work in the north or the Midlands rather than in the south of England. Official documents reveal that the only exemption backed by the Department of Health would be for highly paid managers working in new bodies established to deliver Lansley's controversial NHS reform programme, widely criticised as a privatisation of the health service.

The department, according to a submission to the NHS pay review body, believes special arrangements would be necessary for this new cohort of executives to "attract and retain high-calibre leaders and staff responsible for transforming delivery".

Every day they give us a new reason to hate them. They really don't care. By 2015 Lansley will have his board of directors role all setup at some private healthcare firm.

Bones McCoy · **Joined:** Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am **Posts:** 7331

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

Bones may disagree but it seems to me that it shows that Darling's last budget would have reduced the deficit slowly and steadily, as he promised at the time (2 parliaments to reduce it). The June 2010 data are Osborne's first budget, which shows the deficit being reduced more quickly (meaning more pain, unemployment etc.). It does, however, reduce the deficit. The last data set doesn't reduce the deficit as much.

However, I'm not seeing how the 2010 and 2012 budgets have data for 2009-10. It looks suspect to me, unless there is some more data to show the working.

Yes the second paragraph.
Economists, Homeopaths, 2 cheeks same arsehole etc etc.

Bones McCoy · **Joined:** Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am **Posts:** 7331

new puritan wrote:

As if this fucking clown hasn't done enough damage already.

Andrew Lansley backs lower pay for NHS staff in poorer areas

Quote:

Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, is threatening another controversial revolution in the NHS by proposing that its staff be paid less if they work in poorer parts of the country.

The cabinet minister is backing a plan for regional pay, which would mean that nurses, midwives, hospital porters, cleaners and paramedics would earn less if they work in the north or the Midlands rather than in the south of England. Official documents reveal that the only exemption backed by the Department of Health would be for highly paid managers working in new bodies established to deliver Lansley's controversial NHS reform programme, widely criticised as a privatisation of the health service.

The department, according to a submission to the NHS pay review body, believes special arrangements would be necessary for this new cohort of executives to "attract and retain high-calibre leaders and staff responsible for transforming delivery".

I'd like to steak in favour of Lansley fucking off and dying.

We're All In This Together?

Who is online