It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 1:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23027
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
I can't really see where this fits, so I've given it its own thread. And apologies to Andrew Pugh for lifiting such a big chunk, but I think he'll understand if he frequents our place:

From the Press Gazette: http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp ... =49253&c=1

Quote:
A Mail Online comment moderator was removed from his post for amending a reader's comment.

The issue was highlighted when reader Ray Pooley complained to the Press Complaints Commission that one of his comments had been altered by the moderator.

As part of a discussion among readers about the newspaper’s moderation of the comment thread, Pooley originally wrote: “And on an allegedly unmoderated thread. Par for the course on this forum unfortunately.”

But his comment was amended by the moderator following submission and was published as follows: “And on an allegedly unmoderated thread. Par for the course on this forum unfortunately. OF COURSE it’s moderated – you people are not responsible for any legal actions, the paper is… think before you ink”.

The complaint was resolved when the newspaper “explained that unfortunately the incident was the work of a new moderator who broke several rules by adding his own words to the end of the complainant’s comments”.

The website accepted this was “completely unacceptable” and said the moderator had been “removed from their post”.

“It had never happened before and the newspaper was confident it would not happen again,” said the PCC. “The newspaper apologised for the unfortunate sequence of events.”


I must admit I'd never thought of going to the PCC over amended comments, but this raises some interesting points about the degree to which the comments section is seen as part of the editorial content of the website, and to what extent the moderators are responsible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2843
Interesting. I wonder if the complaint was upheld because the moderator added something to the original comment, rather than simply removing things from it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23027
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
That quote is pretty much the whole PCC entry for the incident.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:38 pm
Posts: 600
Well the terms of the DM comments section do say I think that they may be edited as do letter sections to printed newspapers but adding comments in the way that one did pushed the definition to breaking point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5802
Location: Arslikan EU
I have had a few of mine chopped about on Littlejohn over the years that changed the meaning.
At the time I was rather pissed off. So not an isolated rogue moderator then. Sounds a familar defence.

_________________
"Fanaticism is the only form of willpower to which the weak minded and irresolute can rise."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 2:40 pm
Posts: 325
Location: Night Desk
Amazing they admitted culpability. Now let's see an investigation into all the tracking bugs and ad spyware the site is infested with. Would be good to see the former mod sign up here and truly spill the beans. They definitely yank whole comment sections if they don't like the tone or direction they go in, i.e. unswerving, on message IDS/Davis/Redwood style Toryism.

_________________
"...now, with a most inhuman cruelty, they who have put out the people’s eyes, reproach them of their blindness..."
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5233
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
I had one of mine chopped for Hitchens rants. Changed to suit Hitchens' argument. So has a good friend of mine.

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:42 am 
Online

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3359
Location: chesterfield
Just wondering if this was comments under a story or the discussion thing they sometimes run.

I would have thought you can usually justify deleting anything in a comment that breaks the house rules but there can never be any justification for adding words to somebody's comments especially if the additional words severely distort the views of the person who posted the comments.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:19 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 2747
Location: N Wales Compound, EUKSSR
I'm pretty surprised that there actually are on-staff moderators. I expect they will be quietly replaced by Mechanical Turk in the next couple of years, like Facebook.

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail Online Moderators
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: That London
Yes, it would be interesting to hear from a former moderator. We all know chopping of comments goes on but I never realised they add to them as well - wonder if this is common practice?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group