I got that earlier today. A different article though.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.

One cunt puts another in perspective you mean?

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)

Jesus Christ what does this say about the standards of British journalism?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2141528/Honours-Mail-columnist-Littlejohn-prestigious-awards-ceremony.html

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com

I wouldn't expect anything less of the mail.

Narcissism requires denial and a host of other psychological defense mechanisms.

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....

Hmmmmmmm, I don't have a whole heap of that fancy book learning so maybe I am missing something. Can anyone shed any light on precisely what legal reasons?

_________________
I'd rather shoot Paul Dacre than anyone else in the country- Colin Dexter. A direct quote from the Radio Times m'learned friends

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1uLxrzfud

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...

Four comments have now been allowed on the article. Guess the earlier message citing "legal reasons" was just nonsense.

Does he not realise that his ever so clever references to members of the forum are utterly lost on everyone, except those of us who use the forum? Who does he think he will entertain with that, the people who read the comments won't have a clue what he's on about.

And as for the Marmite comment about Littlejohn, I personaly don't find it that difficult to ignore Marmite should I want to. Even the people responsible for judging these worthless competitions cannot come up with a workable analogy about him.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"

I think we should have a Brilliant Watch thread. I mentioned elsewhere how The Mail always use 'brilliant' to describe their hacks.

A more apt analogy on Zelo Street

_________________
I disagreed with the burglar’s policy, of tying me to a chair. But I did admire his convictions.

But he's increasingly ignored, isn't he? 50 comments is feeble.

He's a busted flush.
He's only speaking to the loony fringe now.

The internet, so miserably misunderstood by Drippy Dacre, means that more and more people realise that his schtick is schitt. His 'faithful followers' are clearly none-too-savvy or they'd see the rebuttals everywhere.

It's more like an ant shitting your mat, and its followers getting huffy 'cos you didn't get as angry as you did when the cat Type 7'd all over your duvet.

_________________
MY COMMENTS ARE FROM THE HORSES MOUTH AND ARE ALL FACTS

Wally lost the plot a long time ago. Getting banned from here seems to have tipped him further into the abyss as witnessed by his obsessional rants in the comments. As you say the other commentators must be bemused by him.


I think you've misread it, it says "unlike Marmite, you can't forget him and you can't ignore him" so it's saying that you can ignore Marmite but impossible to ignore Littlejohn.
Marmite is one of the oldest brands still in production, I doubt there can be many Brits who have never tasted it or who would fail to recognise the jar. The same cannot be said of Littlecock, and Marmite will be remembered long after he's dead and gone.

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...