It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 8:50 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2454 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156 ... 164  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 5978
Location: That London
Yeah because nothing else has changed since the 50s (such as diet, amount of non-housework-related activity etc) - it's all down to not using enough elbow grease in the housework. Because I'm sure Marilyn Monroe spent all her free time scrubbing floors.


Last edited by Fflaps on Fri May 25, 2012 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4948
Location: West Midlands
Or for that matter corsets and girdles. Still, what did you expect? A fair comparison?

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
A woman can have a 34in waist or more and still look good and in proportion...and slim. It's all about proprtion.

Not that that matters to them, anything above the fifties ideal means you are fat, lazy and won't get a man. Cocks.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
Fat, lazy and won't get a man... um... generally, aren't those the women purported by gossip rags and the DM to have men, perhaps a number of such creatures, solely to live off THOSE SOCIALIST BENEFITS WOTS FORRINS COMES TO GET and stuff?

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
Depends where the woman is from.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 2:30 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Underpants
Isn't there that thing that insists that all women's thighs are now fatter than they were in the Fifties because of every single female wore a mini-skirt in the Sixties?

That's pure bollocks, surely?

_________________
Si vas a plagiar noticias, no uses un sitio de noticias falsas como fuente.


Last edited by Carlos The Badger on Thu Feb 31, 2021 18:60 am, edited 666 times in total.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
It is, but sadly it's no more stupid than some of the other theories spouted by the lady bashing fraternity.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:23 pm
Posts: 725
Sexual harrassment suffered by HALF female workforce - while 40% say they have been touched inappropriately by colleagues

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z1wCW11xmQ

The article is a fairly straightforward report on a survey of 3400 women, the findings and figures are depressing enough but it's acted as a dog whistle for this lot (all firmly in the red, but still..) :roll:


Quote:
Feminist Pigs.. so ready to play at being a victim if they think they can make a compensation claim and ruin a man's life..

- AC, London, 28/5/2012 17:24


Quote:
Here we go again an article written by a woman blaming men for sexual harassment. We have come to expect this bilge from the feminist harpies.

- Simon, Somerset, 28/5/2012 18:30



Quote:
"40% say they have been touched inappropriately by colleagues". Yeah 40% might "say" but only about 1% have been touched. The other 39% are seeking revenge on a man for some reason or another. Probably had their own advances snubbed!

- Vincent Pinner, London, 28/5/2012 18:19



Quote:
Feminist propaganda, you're sneaking a lot of this in just lately DM. Anyway, I wonder how many men have experienced exactly the same thing, but are expected to put up and shut up.

- Samantha, In the Middle, UK, 28/5/2012 17:58



There's bloody loads of them, including variations on 'I complained to my boss about sexual harassment - but he still won't do it. Ha ha ha'

I think AC, London and Vincent Pinner may be speaking from experience.

And Samantha In the Middle is quite right, I always look to the Mail for my daily dose of feminist propaganda.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 12:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3819
Samantha touches on a good point, but as ever with the Mail it's wrapped up in self-interest and scoring points against easy targets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 12:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
davidjay wrote:
Samantha touches on a good point, but as ever with the Mail it's wrapped up in self-interest and scoring points against easy targets.



Touches on in the sense of derailing? What relevance does the sexual harassment of men have to this article?

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 12:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3819
storygirl wrote:
davidjay wrote:
Samantha touches on a good point, but as ever with the Mail it's wrapped up in self-interest and scoring points against easy targets.



Touches on in the sense of derailing? What relevance does the sexual harassment of men have to this article?


She hasn't derailed at all, she raised a relevant point. Abuse/harassment against men is a problem, and often ignored/laughed off. That's the relevance in this article.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
davidjay wrote:
storygirl wrote:
davidjay wrote:
Samantha touches on a good point, but as ever with the Mail it's wrapped up in self-interest and scoring points against easy targets.



Touches on in the sense of derailing? What relevance does the sexual harassment of men have to this article?


She hasn't derailed at all, she raised a relevant point. Abuse/harassment against men is a problem, and often ignored/laughed off. That's the relevance in this article.


No, its not, it is an article about the harrasment of women in the workplace, abuse of men happens, but is a separate topic and it is a common tactic of people who would rather women kept quiet and in their place to raise it. The what about the menz meme is overused but this is a classic use of it. 40% of women report sexual harassment in the workplace, that is a story that needs to be told, without needing to apologise for it or say of course some men get harassed too.

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 1:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3819
Nobody here is saying this story shouldn't be told or attempting to derail it. Nobody is trying to keep it quiet. Nobody is apologising for it. One comment - just one - touches on a similar topic. The debate then continues. I fail to see why you have such a vehement objection to that one comment being made.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
Her point is valid but completely and utterly irrelevant.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lady bashing
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:36 am
Posts: 1431
Location: NORTHUMBERLAND
davidjay wrote:
Nobody here is saying this story shouldn't be told or attempting to derail it. Nobody is trying to keep it quiet. Nobody is apologising for it. One comment - just one - touches on a similar topic. The debate then continues. I fail to see why you have such a vehement objection to that one comment being made.



Because her point is irrelevant as Althea says but you chose to highight it, seeing it as relevant because it was about men.

_________________
Blog...http://itsjustahobby.wordpress.com/

Soon, if we are not prudent, millions of people will be watching each other starve to death through expensive television sets. Nye Bevan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2454 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156 ... 164  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group