It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 10:45 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702 ... 821  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23617
Location: England - the old fashioned tolerant one.
Nope. I've got the death sentence in twelve systems.

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4367
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
oboogie wrote:
This curiosity has appeared. Anyone claim it?
Quote:
the Jubilee celebrations seems to have sent many Left-wingers into even more of a depressive and humourless spiral than usual. - Wally Toynbee, England, 5/6/2012 17:52 - How do you know so many left-wingers Wally? Because I don't think I've ever met one. I've noticed that you're always going on about them and promoting some website or other. Are you from the SWP or something?
- John, England, 06/6/2012 12:07
Click to rate Rating 4Report abuse


SWP? Oooh he won't like that. :D



Crabcakes:
Quote:
Seems Wally is referring to us by name now and using our own pseudonyms. Of course, what will happen now is we'll all accuse each other of slagging other people off and then there'll be a big fight and the forum will shut down.

Or, we can have a bemused chuckle at poor, obsessed, attention-seeking old Wally using yet another troll-by-numbers routine that's more obviously spotted than the sun on a sunny day, and move on.

EDIT: also, lots and lots on anti-LJ comments and lots and lots of immediate responses to the same. I suspect with a bank holiday giving them time to fill Wally and chums have been arguing with their own pseudonyms as most people here can't be arsed to comment at all because Dickie's output is so limp these days. How about shouting at yourself in a mirror instead? It'd be a darn sight quicker (oh, and pretending people who are complaining are from here in what I assume is another troll 101 tactic to make the DM take action against us won't work, as they'll ban via IP. So you'll end up banning yourself, if anything).


He also doesn't seem to have figured out that people will naturaly report back here if they see any posts added in their name that weren't actualy written by them, resulting in his attempts causing no problems here whatsoever.

Massive trollfail. :D

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:09 pm
Posts: 458
Kiss me goodnight, prison warder...

A moan about a female Asian prison officer who, despite him having zero evidence of it being the case, must have been hired solely to fill some diversity quota - backed up with a few obligatory Porridge references and followed by a load of drivel about transsexual police officers which has absolute fuck-all to do with anything. Then there's some crap about his other favourite topic: dogging. Then something about how Jedward look like the Olypic torch, and another 70s sitcom reference to finish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1434
Location: Bristol
The first piece is offensive, boring and shallow - why shouldn't "petite" women, hermaphrodites or trans-sexuals/trans-genders/transvestites be allowed to be prison officers? Ooh, let me guess, because they're not stereotypical hard men. Never mind that all of them could be built like brick shithouses or red-hot at martial arts.

The rest? Just boring and shallow. Dickie seems to be turning into Glenda Slagg.

_________________
Us Amazonians always get our man...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2089
That Jedward gag came straight from Jedward themselves - was all over twitter days ago.

Lazy fucker.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3426
Location: chesterfield
I can't find much on the web about the prison officer case other than the various stories that have appeared in the Mail. The only other account I cam across stated that Zanib had taken the job at Brixton in order to raise money to fund a law degree, this would suggest that she probably had the necessary academic qualifications to get the job on merit rather than getting the job to tick the diversity box.
Does Richie really think that prison officers at Brixton would willing accept a new officer in their team who they thought would be a liability in the event of a riot or a disturbance.

I'm surprised he didn't compare and contrast how Zanib got a year in prison for sending inappropriate text messages while Hunt and Osborne continue to draw salaries as cabinet ministers have sending inappropriate text messages regarding the BSKYB bid.

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Women prison officers, the more petite the better, are often very good at calming down angry men.

I can't be bothered to read the article, but he might be hearing from the Prison Officers Association.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 4367
Location: That fancy London, with it's book learning. Sadly not being anywhere else..
I knew a woman who was applying for a vacancy in a local prison. She wasn't even applying for a warden vacancy and the level of paperwork and backround checking was staggering.
They really would not take just anyone to fill a quota.

_________________
"Now get those trousers off before someone dies!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 1:42 pm
Posts: 1650
Quote:
Now why can't RB of BRUM at 10.35 be as positive and realistic as his comment indicates, All the time? Usually he makes me chew the carpet when he lauds the Disability lobby via Poulton's sob-fests - but this time he's absolutelt spot-on! Now, here's a thought? Why can't RB, GEORGE HALEY and MICHAEL JAY come out of retirement and start-up a private, "proper" policing service to show us all what we've been missing - and how the job Should be done, in the way that the public would like it to be done? RB's right though. Since '97 the Police Service has been ruined, mainly by the two Blairs -you only have to see the corrosive effect of all the "diversity" bull to know that! Where else would a character like Desai have been allowed to become "untouchable" and to be left to run a solo course of corrup dealings, with everyone knowing, but everyone also afraid to finger him because of that waving "race card"? Challoner was out on his ear pronto at Scotland Yard, years ago for less!
- John Smith, Birmingham, England, 8/6/2012 11:19


Lucky Mrs Smith, eh?

Quote:
I heard that the reason the BBC refused to show the Jubberly was because it's illegal to broadcast a picture of a Union Jack in Britain now in case it offends someone, they have to be pixelated out and, since the cuts, the BBC couldn't afford the staff. Thanks NuLabour.
- John, England, 8/6/2012 12:42


Assuming John, England is of parts local, you forgot to add FACT!!!

_________________
I'd rather shoot Paul Dacre than anyone else in the country- Colin Dexter. A direct quote from the Radio Times m'learned friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:05 pm
Posts: 318
Anyone in any job who is forrin is only there to fulfil quotas. FACT.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10768
Location: Durham
SoulBoy wrote:
Quote:
I heard that the reason the BBC refused to show the Jubberly was because it's illegal to broadcast a picture of a Union Jack in Britain now in case it offends someone, they have to be pixelated out and, since the cuts, the BBC couldn't afford the staff. Thanks NuLabour.
- John, England, 8/6/2012 12:42


Assuming John, England is of parts local, you forgot to add FACT!!!

Well whichever one of us posted that, it seems to have backfired, it's currently 10 in the green. That's ten people who think the BBC didn't cover the Jubilee and haven't seen any pictures of Union Jacks on TV on any channel!!

Edit: More of John's work, this time on a story about an unemployed bloke who can't find work as he's overqualified.
Quote:
I never employ anybody with qualifications as the educated ones tend to be too left wing and are aware of their rights and the law and are therefore harder to bully. I prefer the right wingers who have sensible views, know their place and are too dim to fight back.
- John, England, 8/6/2012 20:21
Click to rate Rating 6


Interesting that 6 DM readers agree that right-wingers are dim though.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1xETSb0rc

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5379
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Quote:
You would have thought that the fact her father is serving four years for immigration offences might also have counted against her.


No. I wouldn't think that offences committed by other members of your family should be held against you.

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5379
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
I double checked that.

http://www.justice.gov.uk/jobs/prisons/ ... igiblility

Nothing in their that suggests this young lady had to disclose her family's or boyfriend's convictions.

You might think with all the vetting that's done that people are not vetted with respect to other family members.

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:43 pm
Posts: 1434
Location: Bristol
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... ming-.html

Bullshit Bullshit Bullshit.

And as for that last bit...just how long has it been since it was ripping off The Daily Mash, anyway?

_________________
Us Amazonians always get our man...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Lidljohns Column
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 2:07 am
Posts: 3426
Location: chesterfield
I wonder what evidence he has got to back up this stupid claim?

Quote:
After Saddam Hussein flooded the Persian Gulf with crude oil, we were told the pollution would last two million years. It was all gone in six months.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z1xXBeCOIe


I wonder if the mods will allow through any poems that refer to Richie or Scotch eggs?

_________________
www.newshuddlines.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 696, 697, 698, 699, 700, 701, 702 ... 821  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mojojojo and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group