It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 5:10 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:46 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11891
Location: East London
Big Rob wrote:
Quote:
This would entail the cutting of ties between Church and state that have lasted for nearly 500 years, threatening a series of major consequences.


Consequences such as?


Everyone in power having to act Anglican.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23000
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Excellent post by Andrew Copson (British Humanist Association) on what would happen if the C of E was disestablished...

Andrew Copson wrote:
...does that mean it's okay to go ahead in Northern Ireland and Wales where the Church isn't established anyway?

...does it mean that removal of the Bishops from the House of Lords (the last thing we were told would mean disestablishment) wouldn't actually mean disestablishment and we can go ahead with removing them?

...how long after the introduction of equal civil marriage does the Church intend to hand over its schools?

...how long after the introduction of equal civil marriage does the Church intend to remove its state-funded chaplains from prisons, hospitals and the armed forces?

...why don't they already consider themselves disestablished by virtue of the fact that most marriages already aren't conducted by them anyway but are civil marriages?

Or is this just is a devious, desperate attempt by shamelessly self-interested moral authoritarians to impose their own limited and unshared view of human relationships on everyone else by threats, scare-mongering and hyperbolic raising of the stakes to distract from the fact that this debate isn't - or shouldn't be - about them but about the civil right of two people in love to have their relationship recognised by their friends and family and the law in the country where they live?

You decide!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:03 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11891
Location: East London
But he misses the key point- gay marriage is stopping the economy from picking up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:30 am
Posts: 5220
Location: Hearing Banjo Music...
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Big Rob wrote:
Quote:
This would entail the cutting of ties between Church and state that have lasted for nearly 500 years, threatening a series of major consequences.


Consequences such as?


Everyone in power having to act Anglican.


"I am a Christian but I am really crap at it. All the real Christians crossed the Atlantic a while ago."

_________________
You may say I'm a dreamer.... but I'm not the only one....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12706
Location: Up my own arse.
Nice to hear the BHA talking about equal marriage rather than gay marriage. Billy Bragg also made this point the other day.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:41 pm
Posts: 3383
Location: Elbonia
Abernathy wrote:
Nice to hear the BHA talking about equal marriage rather than gay marriage. Billy Bragg also made this point the other day.

Yeah, I realised that I wasn't doing that myself, so I've largely shifted to marriage equality/equal marriage, or failing that 'same-sex marriage' works almost as well.

_________________
Changin' avatars like there's no tomorrow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12706
Location: Up my own arse.
You may already have seen this, but I think it's so marvellous it warrants re-posting here.

The New Zealand parliament passed legislation bringing in equal marriage. When the result was announced, the whole chamber and strangers' gallery burst into spontaneous song.

Just lovely.....

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/04/17/new-zealand-mps-sing-maor_n_3100103.html

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:15 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5392
Location: A town near the Sea
This was a great speech by one of the Mp's

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/1 ... 00714.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 311
Location: Erewhon
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:
All marriages are civil, the bit in the church is mostly a blessing and a bit of music. I do wish people (not you, people in the big outside) could get their heads round that.


That's the nub of the issue I think. The state has a definition of marriage and a set of rules governing who can get married. Religious institutions also have their own definitions of marriage and sets of rules. The problem is one of ownership of the definition. Until the two are separated fully - i.e. state and religious marriages there will continue to be conflict.

As an aside, Malcolm, I think you're looking at this from the perspective of the state. From a religious perspective it's the ceremony in church which matters - the civil part is just squaring things with the state.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2013 10:32 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11891
Location: East London
Vote going on now.

IDS and others have already voted for a "conscience clause" for registrars to opt out of marrying the gays.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Mon May 20, 2013 10:33 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11891
Location: East London
Quote:
Tim Loughton's amendment has been defeated by 375 votes to 70 - a majority of 305.

He insisted it wasn't a wrecking amendment. But many MPs insisted it was. And now it's gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 12:27 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 11891
Location: East London
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/audio ... arth-audio

Quote:
Sir Gerald Howarth MP (Con): 'There are plenty in the aggressive homosexual community who see this as but a stepping-stone'- audio


The pendulum's gone far too far the other way, apparently.

He also makes some pathetic attempt at saying he's being "shouted down". The volume is about a tenth what it is when Ed Balls speaks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 12706
Location: Up my own arse.
Ahh, so that's what that hashtag on Twitter was about......

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 10:06 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5392
Location: A town near the Sea
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Vote going on now.

IDS and others have already voted for a "conscience clause" for registrars to opt out of marrying the gays.


Shame he can't put that kind of clause into practice when he dreams up one of his horrible schemes to force those who are ill or disabled "back to work" (or into the job centre which is usually the case).


Last edited by mattomac on Tue May 21, 2013 11:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gay Marriage
PostPosted: Tue May 21, 2013 11:19 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 pm
Posts: 2738
Location: N Wales Compound, EUKSSR
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/audio/2013/may/20/same-sex-marriage-howarth-audio

Quote:
Sir Gerald Howarth MP (Con): 'There are plenty in the aggressive homosexual community who see this as but a stepping-stone'- audio


The pendulum's gone far too far the other way, apparently.

He also makes some pathetic attempt at saying he's being "shouted down". The volume is about a tenth what it is when Ed Balls speaks.

Steppi... what???? :lol:

What exactly does he think we'll want next? Our own space programme?

_________________
Soppy anti-British, pro-crime, anti-education, pro-immigration, anti-family nonentity


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group