The EDL

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3837

Their political wing are making a big push for credibility:

www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/197 ... ist-organi

oboogie · **Posted:** Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:53 pm

Ex-EDL organiser, animal rights activist and anti-Halal slaughter campaigner John "Snowy" Shaw now banned from keeping animals for 10 years after leaving his Llamas to stave to death.

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/at- ... -1-4637332

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:55 pm

He's still very much involved with the Infidels, of course.

And a campaigner against cruel practices of slaughtering...

oboogie · **Posted:** Fri Jun 15, 2012 4:23 pm

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

He's still very much involved with the Infidels, of course.

And a campaigner against cruel practices of slaughtering...

In a way I think of the Infidels as more honest than the EDL, they're utter racist cunts, but they don't care who knows it. Unlike the leadership of the EDL who pretend that they are just opposing "radical Islam" when, in fact, they are just a bigots drinking club who like violence, vandalism and cocaine.

Speaking of which....
I think ought to have EDL Bingo here.

... and then there's the bunch of assorted socio-paths and fantasists which form the ranks of CXF. No-longer content with targeting people with brown skins, they have cast their net of bile further to include harassing women who speak out against them.
http://www.edlnews.co.uk/index.php/late ... -workplace

davidjay · **Joined:** Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm **Posts:** 3837

What the fuck comes next? Protesting against a woman who told her boyfriend she'd rather go for a Indian than a Toby carvery? Outing a peedo who went to a hen night in a St Trinian's uniform? Flashmobbing outside a shop that sells Halal chewing gum?

moonkatt · **Posted:** Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:41 pm

oboogie wrote:

... and then there's the bunch of assorted socio-paths and fantasists which form the ranks of CXF. No-longer content with targeting people with brown skins, they have cast their net of bile further to include harassing women who speak out against them.
http://www.edlnews.co.uk/index.php/late ... -workplace

The CXF are a bunch of Walts of the highest order. They're the sort of military bore you get sat in the pub nursing a pint, telling everyone how bad it was in 'Ghanners expecting people to buy them drinks, when the closest they got to the army was a TA selection weekend where they discovered they fell far below the fitness or behavioural standards expected.

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:13 am

If you want to know what the real (ex) military think of the CXF then the ARRSE (Army Rumour Service) forum is a good read (and quite funny too).
Real soldiers can spot a Walt a mile off e.g. it seems that CXF don't even know how to wear a beret properly. I'd have thought studying the odd photo might have taught them that, but apparently that's too complicated for them.
http://www.arrse.co.uk/current-affairs- ... group.html

Bones McCoy · **Joined:** Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am **Posts:** 7339

Found this on-line http://edlnews.co.uk/index.php/featured-stories/derek-fender-corner/519-cxf-entry-requirements-revealed

It's late.
Time for bed, boinggggg......

oboogie · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:44 am

From the ARRSE forum, the views of a real soldier on the CXF

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGrinch

Quote:

Anyone had any dealings with this group? They held a series of flash demos around the Manchester area yesterday. They appear to be a splinter group of the EDL ( think People's front of Judea but not as funny). The ex forces element seemed to be 3 scousers in really badly shaped Kingos berets and 2 midgets in a an RTR beret and a Caubeen respectively. Their informed debate about islamification was to repeatedly sing "Mohammed was a Paedo"
Like many I have concerns about some issues of Islam and the failure of multi culturalism, but does anyone think these demos do any good?

What they actually sing is "Allah was a paedo" which is strange considering Allah is just the same as God, even Christians in the Middle east refer to god as Allah. But I know they really mean Mohammad.
They claim Mohammad was a paedo due to him being married to a child bride when she was 6 years old in Saudi 1500 years ago. But completely ignore the fact King Richard II married a 6 year old only 700 years ago, here in England.
There claim to justify this, is that Muslims follow what Mohammad did but Christians do not follow what our Kings do. Well I have not seen a muslim riding a Donkey down our main street rather than a car, refuse to use electricity or fly in a plane, because Mohammad did not do those things.

Paedophiles come in all races and religions, they should know, the EDL was co-founded by a convicted paedophile. The CxF and EDL protest against the possibility of Sharia type barbaric laws being introduced in the UK, yet they turn up outside a court demanding the immediate execution of men that have yet to be found guilty. Then they complain about John Terry being mistreated by the FA for his racist language on a football pitch, claiming people are innocent until proven guilty.

Irony meters explode as you get within 50yds of these Cxf and EDL grunts.

Althea · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:35 am

Excellent points there, but one has to remember that logic means nothing to these people (if you can call the EDL 'people').

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:42 am

Ann of Bohemia was 16 when she married Richard II.

Just sayin'...

Althea · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:52 am

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

Ann of Bohemia was 16 when she married Richard II.

Just sayin'...

Isabella of Valois was 6 when she married Richard II.

Just sayin'...

Malcolm Armsteen · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:25 am

Althea wrote:

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

Ann of Bohemia was 16 when she married Richard II.

Just sayin'...

Isabella of Valois was 6 when she married Richard II.

Just sayin'...

A political union never consummated.

ponce on the heath · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:43 am

Would I be right in assuming that in a lot of the cases listed (and no doubt repeated countless times through history) the marriage amounted to political patonage more than sexual dominion over a minor? We know that brides were expected to consumate a marriage at an age we would consider to be very young by our modern standards, but it seems a bit of a stretch that so many adult men could see six year olds as sexually desirable.

It also never ceases to amaze me that the same people who hold up outdated practices like this see it as he benchmark of all evil refuse to aknowldge the fact that in those days, whole infant populations could be extinguished or sold into slavery as an extention of millitary conquest or land ownership policy. Obviously, I am not for a second condoning these kind of marriages, but it seems to me that if we assume there was no sexual exploiation until an "approprite" age, the qualty of life of these inter-tribal brides was a lot more secure than the children who lived on the land.

Allah may or may not be a "pedo", but Yahweh wasn't particularly merciful to the Egyptian firstborns either.

Althea · **Posted:** Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:03 pm

Malcolm Armsteen wrote:

A political union never consummated.

And? They were still married.

The EDL

Who is online