Rampant racism

Fozzy · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:24 pm

Starkey has shot his mouth off about how the Rochdale rapists committed their crimes as a result of being fuzzy-wuzzy forrins from the Punjab foothills - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1ykfX8Hot

And the BNP's entire membership has clearly received orders to spend the afternoon sending comments saying how right he was and hitting the arrows like mad things. The arrows on every single comment are well into four figures, with the best rated -

Quote:

The fact that he is absolutely right makes no difference to the brainwashed, P.C. zealots.
- kommonsens, Sheffield, 24/6/2012 16:04

- being at over 4500.

You have to wonder, yet again, just how brain dead the BNP membership have to be to think that anyone actually gives a toss about arrows on comments on the Mail website.

gonzo99uk · **Joined:** Mon Jan 17, 2011 12:53 pm **Posts:** 57

Quote:

David Starkey maybe a "Historian", but his geography is very poor. All but one of the men convicted came from Pakistan (the other was from Afghanistan) and Punjab is in India. Two different countries altogether. Its like mixing up France and the UK. Actually its worse than that, because at least France / UK are both Christian countries. Pakistan is a Muslim country run by a Islamic government, whilst India is a Hindu country run by a democratic government.
- HJS, Leicester, 24/6/2012 16:09
Rating 1831

Say no more - why let facts get in the way of a good dog whistle!

Giant f*cking Sudoku · **Posted:** Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:46 am

If the hardcore right-wingers could ditch Cameron and form their own dream cabinet, then surely Starkey would get Minister for Culture.

oboogie · **Posted:** Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:15 am

gonzo99uk wrote:

Quote:

David Starkey maybe a "Historian", but his geography is very poor. All but one of the men convicted came from Pakistan (the other was from Afghanistan) and Punjab is in India. Two different countries altogether. Its like mixing up France and the UK. Actually its worse than that, because at least France / UK are both Christian countries. Pakistan is a Muslim country run by a Islamic government, whilst India is a Hindu country run by a democratic government.
- HJS, Leicester, 24/6/2012 16:09
Rating 1831

Say no more - why let facts get in the way of a good dog whistle!

Actually the Punjab is a historical region which straddles the border of North West India and Eastern Pakistan so it is incorrect to assume, as HJS does, that a Punjabi is a) Pakistani b) Muslim (also there are Muslims in India and Hindus in Pakistan of course).

Fflaps · **Posted:** Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:18 am

Yep, I think quite a lot of Sikhs would have something to say about that...

The Red Arrow · **Posted:** Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:20 am

He's still conveniently overlooking white 'christian' paedo's in the UK.

Fozzy · **Posted:** Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:19 am

oboogie wrote:

gonzo99uk wrote:

Quote:

David Starkey maybe a "Historian", but his geography is very poor. All but one of the men convicted came from Pakistan (the other was from Afghanistan) and Punjab is in India. Two different countries altogether. Its like mixing up France and the UK. Actually its worse than that, because at least France / UK are both Christian countries. Pakistan is a Muslim country run by a Islamic government, whilst India is a Hindu country run by a democratic government.
- HJS, Leicester, 24/6/2012 16:09
Rating 1831

Say no more - why let facts get in the way of a good dog whistle!

Actually the Punjab is a historical region which straddles the border of North West India and Eastern Pakistan so it is incorrect to assume, as HJS does, that a Punjabi is a) Pakistani b) Muslim (also there are Muslims in India and Hindus in Pakistan of course).

Just a trifle worrying that a supposedly reputable historian is as cavalier as that with facts. It might make you doubt his accuracy on historical facts, I couldn't possibly comment.

Abernathy · **Posted:** Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:24 am

It's not the cavalier attitude to the facts that gets me, it's the out and out racist cuntery.

KevS · **Joined:** Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:59 pm **Posts:** 385

On the story about DC's proposal for lower benefits for those in the north:

Quote:

we will just move down south then and make it whiter
- nick, newcastle, 25/6/2012 21:16
Click to rate Rating 304

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 764

The Red Arrow wrote:

He's still conveniently overlooking white 'christian' paedo's in the UK.

I think the technical term is 'Priests'

Althea · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:23 am

Silkyman wrote:

I think the technical term is 'Priests'

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 764

Keep meaning to ask who your avatar is.. I'm sure I've seen that film.

Althea · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:43 am

Silkyman wrote:

Keep meaning to ask who your avatar is.. I'm sure I've seen that film.

It's not out until September, so you haven't

(It's Olivia Thirlby as Judge Anderson in the upcoming Dredd film)

Silkyman · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:31 am **Posts:** 764

Looks really familiar. I've seen a lot of big budget budget and zero budget sci fi action films in my time though.

oboogie · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:34 pm

Fozzy wrote:

oboogie wrote:

Actually the Punjab is a historical region which straddles the border of North West India and Eastern Pakistan so it is incorrect to assume, as HJS does, that a Punjabi is a) Pakistani b) Muslim (also there are Muslims in India and Hindus in Pakistan of course).

Just a trifle worrying that a supposedly reputable historian is as cavalier as that with facts. It might make you doubt his accuracy on historical facts, I couldn't possibly comment.

That error is HJS's not Starkey's however.
Starkey's error is being a racist bigot and airing his views in public to ensure we all know it.

Rampant racism

Who is online