It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:25 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6953
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
New G4S embarrassment as two guards protecting Olympic venue are arrested on suspicion of being illegal immigrants

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z210G8kqs3
Quote:
Officers swooped on the venue after their alleged bogus status is said to have been revealed in an accreditation check by G4S, which has been criticised after failing to provide enough staff for the Games.

So why should that embarrass G4S?

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6953
Location: Time Vortex
Quote:
More security woes for G4S as 50 security guards walk out after claiming they weren't paid for six weeks

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z21GTW7ceH
Quote:
The staff work for Arete Securex, which was sub-contracted by G4S to provide security for the stadium during the Olympics.
Mohammed Umar, a supervisor with Arete Securex, admitted there had been ‘some problems’ with paying staff.
He said: 'We had some invoicing delays with G4S but the money is coming on Monday morning.'
A spokesman for G4S said: 'There have been some issues around the Arete workforce being paid on time by their management.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
Something I spotted a couple of days ago, but forgot to post.

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10768
Location: Durham
London 2012: G4S replaced at Newcastle's St James' Park


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-18959672#

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Hunt being very kind about G4S "uplift", "improving", "best performance".

While calling 1,200 soldiers who were only on standby last week. Apparently he doesn't want to take any chances- which is kind of the point of G4S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 11:00 am
Posts: 6953
Location: Time Vortex
Apparently they are recruiting more now. But since recent problems involve employees actually turning up for work, that means little.

_________________
Sick Left-wing Zealot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7419
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
I reckon this will make it much harder to give them contracts.

Outsourcing was never as popular as its mates in the press claimed- to his credit, Douglas Carswell when he was bigging up referenda on everything, admitted privatisers wouldn't do very well in them.

Cameron and all will press on. But we can hope Ed Milliband's nudged away from it.


It may be a clear alternative that Ed can provide between Labour and our Neocon parties.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Hope so.

The border agency staff seem to be copping government verbals more than G4S. If Milliband had kept his powder dry, he could have made this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Clegg's soft soap positive spin on ATOS' attitude to mental health rivalled Hunt on G4S.

I think I now know what Melanie Phillips means by "all must have prizes". At least, if the education system is full of teachers like Hunt and Clegg, we're in very deep shit indeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7419
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Clegg's soft soap positive spin on ATOS' attitude to mental health rivalled Hunt on G4S.

I think I now know what Melanie Phillips means by "all must have prizes". At least, if the education system is full of teachers like Hunt and Clegg, we're in very deep shit indeed.


Something for nothing culture alive and well for government suppliers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:43 am
Posts: 1860
Location: Dorset
G4S to donate £2.5m to armed forces
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/au ... -2-million

Despite having a £284m tax payer funded contract which they failed to deliver upon they are going to donate £2.5m to the armed forces for picking up their mess. Not that this exercise was ever about security over corporate profits, but do they need to be so naked about it? If they can freely give out millions, why couldn't they provide the training and numbers in the first place. It's a terrible PR stunt for a thoroughly disgraced company. It works out at £137 per soldier. Utter disgrace.

_________________
My blog: https://stevenplrose.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 2:33 pm
Posts: 12409
Location: East London
Wasn't the "management fee" £57m, or something?

So they're keeping £54.5m of that?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 7419
smod wrote:
G4S to donate £2.5m to armed forces
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/au ... -2-million

Despite having a £284m tax payer funded contract which they failed to deliver upon they are going to donate £2.5m to the armed forces for picking up their mess. Not that this exercise was ever about security over corporate profits, but do they need to be so naked about it? If they can freely give out millions, why couldn't they provide the training and numbers in the first place. It's a terrible PR stunt for a thoroughly disgraced company. It works out at £137 per soldier. Utter disgrace.


Government pays G4S ~£18,000 per person.
G4S pays army £137 per soldier.

And who pays?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
Quote:
G4S proves we can't always rely on private sector, admits minister

G4S's failure to provide enough Olympic security guards has taught ministers that private firms are unsuited to providing many public services, the Defence Secretary has admitted.

In an interview with The Independent, Philip Hammond said the G4S saga had caused him to rethink his scepticism towards the public sector – and made him appreciate there were some things that only state organisations like the Army could be relied upon to do.

Mr Hammond's frank admission of the limits of the private sector, from a minister currently overseeing the largest overhaul of Britain's armed forces in a generation, will be welcomed by senior military commanders. Some have privately expressed concerns Mr Hammond is intent on pushing through a programme of creeping privatisation as cuts force troops to rely increasingly on commercial contractors.

_________________
"If the past really is a foreign country, I'm surprised that 'The Daily Mail' would want to live there.” - Roger Quimbly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: G4S
PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:59 am
Posts: 13142
Location: Up my own arse.
Samanfur wrote:


Abernathy has just fainted.

_________________
I'm a nasty, violent lefty. You cunt.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group