There's being 'anti police' and then criticising the police, the former of which is silly and the latter is of course valid. The Mail and its commentators seem to want the best of both worlds, a police force that does everything it can (as it should and is reasonable to expect) while at the same time slagging it off when it does anything that 'targets' motorists, etc.
There's also stupid ideas and initiatives, and different ways of dealing with them. Most people here dislike the way the Mail frames things, not that they inherently disagree or agree with EVERYTHING the Mail takes offence at. Offence which is riddled with double standards and hypocrisy.
That is my point exactly.
They have their own opinion
on the police, just you and I do, and like it or not, its only their opinion
on certain matters.
I have read so many times that people state the 'speeding' issue with police is because of the 'middle class'
Nothing to do with it at all, as everyone at some point or another would have sped on the motorway to get somewhere if late.
The speeding issue as we know full well is not to keep drivers safe but to make them more money and catch them out in circumstantial areas of the road.
Now, again he is quoting people about the police in his 1st comment and how wrong it is for them to criticize, but this topic starter is doing the same thing, if not worse, as they are only commenting on a message board that has the topic and agrees with the newspaper.
He is actually going out of his way to find 'snippets' of news from the newspaper to highlight in hisopinion
what is wrong.
Who is right or wrong ? or are all right/wrong in their own way ?!