It is currently Tue May 21, 2013 6:51 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Logging on to the Mail website
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:56 am
Posts: 35
Location: Bucks
Probably the wrong place to ask this, but what the hell....

I tried to log on to the Mail's site to make a comment about one of their stories. It wasn't going to be anything too nasty (sadly). So... I made my comment, did the stuff about inserting my name and e-mail addy (kosher ones too) and ended up having to go through the hoops of "type below the letters you see above you" .. you know, one of those kind of things. This was a complete sod because a) some of the letters/numbers bore no relation to ones I recognise, and b) I did this about 10 times and eventually got pissed off with it and gave up.

Is this the norm? Some kind of trick to keep people away?

_________________
The footless path has many leghorns


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:40 pm
Posts: 2807
It's called a captcha. Because spambots trawl the web looking for places to dump their links, many websites have these image verification system on the basis that spambots can't read them but humans can.

Sadly because robots become a bit more advanced the masking has to get harder to read which can lead to letters that look like a 1 year old scrawled them.

Usually you should have success within 2 or 3 goes, unless you're really unlucky and get consistantly shit ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Logging on to the Mail website
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:05 pm
Posts: 1386
Location: Five minutes walk from the Guardian
It's to stop spambots posting spam automatically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Logging on to the Mail website
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 3246
sven945 wrote:
It's to stop spambots posting spam automatically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Logging on to the Mail website
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:18 pm
Posts: 397
Location: Exeter
cycloon wrote:
sven945 wrote:
It's to stop spambots posting spam automatically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Logging on to the Mail website
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 7:42 pm
Posts: 1014
Run wrote:
cycloon wrote:
sven945 wrote:
It's to stop spambots posting spam automatically.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:14 am
Posts: 494
Location: Jacqui Weems' attic
If you would like to know BoB's opinions on the views above , please enter the following text

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:07 am
Posts: 2261
Location: Lancashire
I wonder if the DM could be prosecuted under the Disability Discrimination Act for not offering an aural alternative to the panels for the visually impaired, as is getting increasingly popular.

Granted, it's not just the DM that could be stung by that, but it'd be an interesting exercise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 11:59 pm 
Offline
(actually Terry Wogan)
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 898
Location: In the Hen Shed. Stocking up.
BoB :

gds9......looks like a snake with arms folded


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:31 pm 
Offline
murderer-loving Eurotrash pansy
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 170
Location: in constant disbelief
Why do they bar spambots? Surely whatever they have to say is more valid than the average DM reader.

I suggest the Express messageboards, God knows there's room if you're not trying to squeeze on the maddie boards (any thoughts on democracy in Burma anyone?..... anyone???)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:40 pm
Posts: 2807
queenofherts wrote:
Why do they bar spambots? Surely whatever they have to say is more valid than the average DM reader.

:lol:

v1agra
mature woman bent over desk tefal
hot babe in nurse outfit
littlejohn for president
labour is shit
cia1i5

I wonder if they'd notice


Maybe we could do a hidden message mind, sorta like this with mailwatch as the first letters.


Completely random example:

My my what a surprise.
Another tragic story.
I am really not shocked at this.
Likely they'll get away with it too
We can't trust the government anymore
And the police are just as bad!
To think we trusted them
Cowardly bunch they are
Hope they get voted out soon!

It'd be more discreet in a rhyme mind.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:00 pm 
Offline
murderer-loving Eurotrash pansy
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 170
Location: in constant disbelief
Quote:
It'd be more discreet in a rhyme mind.


Or Daily Mail Haiku?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:18 pm
Posts: 397
Location: Exeter
Samanfur wrote:
I wonder if the DM could be prosecuted under the Disability Discrimination Act for not offering an aural alternative to the panels for the visually impaired, as is getting increasingly popular.

Granted, it's not just the DM that could be stung by that, but it'd be an interesting exercise.


I think the internet is generally exempt from ever having to provide anything for the disabled, except for government websites.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:05 pm
Posts: 1386
Location: Five minutes walk from the Guardian
There was something a few years back where it was going to be made a legal requirement to have all websites "accessible". I don't know what happened to it, but I assume that they backed down on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:40 pm
Posts: 2807
It takes a large amount of effort to accessiblise a website, I very much doubt it would be enforced since 95%+ of websites would be sued.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group