It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 9:57 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:40 pm
Posts: 2335
Location: Cardiff
ACG wrote:
after yesterday the mail fels the needs to inform its readers as to what this twitter thing is, about 6 months after everyone already knows.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ernet.html

some helpfull little charts of notable tweets there, though some are a bit confusingly catagorised...

shameless name dropping (fry):
"Happy birthday P G Woodhouse, 128 today, few men on this earth gave more unalloyed pleasure. And don't for get Oscar Wilde's 155th tomorrow"

...unless they think he's about 160, i'm pretty sure thats not how name dropping works.
Quote:

JONATHAN ROSS
427,082 FOLLOWERS
Flamboyantly dressed presenter with a penchant
for flirting with guests and leaving rude messages.


oh dear


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:07 am
Posts: 10144
Location: Fantasy land
If Twitter is so bad and evil and wrong, why does the Mail have an account?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:17 pm 
Offline
in a handcart
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 1638
Location: Sussex by the sea
the twitter article (or at least the print version of it... i cant be arsed to check the online version) had several categories of tweets including one called "most embarrassing attempt to be cool." yeah, cos the mail never embarrassingly attempts to be cool with these sorts of articles about "new" trends several months or years after the rest of the world has discovered they exist, does it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:04 am
Posts: 271
Location: in YOUR country
Hang on a sec -- if the power of this new-fangled Twitter contraption can be harnessed to help porky lasses (i.e. all those fatter than the ones featured in the Mail's pervy photo spreads) shift those excess pounds, maybe it's not so bad after all...

Twitter yourself fitter: It's the latest diet craze - tell the world what you're eating and hope that it shames you into losing weight

Hmmm.. I sense a slightly-rewritten press release at the heart of this story.

Though, to be fair, the "shame" element will of course have been added by Polly Filler herself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5802
Location: Arslikan EU
Plane madness: Schoolboy has TV aerial confiscated by Government officials for interfering with aircraft signals


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments


one of us!

Quote:
"Nickie, who lives in the three bedroom semi-detached house with his dad, brother Glenn, 14, and mother Erika, 42, said he was amazed he had caused so much trouble."

What relevance have this lot's domestic arrangements to the story? (Is it because they are middle class?)

What has "madness" (as mentioned in the headline) got to do with anything. I consider the safety of aircraft far more important than little Tarquin's TV aerial.

What a load of rubbish.
- Aljardi, Worcs, UK, 27/10/2009 14:58
Click to rate Rating 37 Report abuse





little old me!

Quote:
The receiver was faulty so it was Heterodyning, everybody knows that!
- Anne, West Midlands, 27/10/2009 14:21
Click to rate Rating 27 Report abuse



a feedback loop really, I was trying to sound posh. In fact my Dad was in the Royal Signals and showed me how to send out a disrupting signal from a receiver when I was about 10.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23054
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Some nice one-liners from 'Perturbed':

Quote:
did he work for Spectre?

- Perturbed, London

Quote:
I've just put an extra layer of tinfoil on my tinfoil hat

- Perturbed, London


Quote:
al qaeda have offered the kid a work experience post

- Perturbed, London



I got a couple of digs in (not funny, but I was bored) but they have been taken down, apart from this one:

Quote:
Do they want to come and confiscate the 25ft aerial in my neighbours garden that looks like something NASA built then!

No wonder we have terrible signals on mobiles and cordless phones here. If only we'd known!

- Laura, Cheshire

Read, and try to understand, the article, Laura. This aerial (note spelling) was faulty and emitting a radio signal. Mobiles work on microwaves, so even if your neighbour's aerial was powered and faulty it couldn't affect your phone.

- Steven, Suffolk,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 1:40 pm
Posts: 2807
Paul wrote:
Plane madness: Schoolboy has TV aerial confiscated by Government officials for interfering with aircraft signals


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... gnals.html


OUTRAGE AS NANNY STATE REDUCES RISK OF PLANES CRASHING!

"When will it end. It's political correctness gone mad" says tiresome bore.
"Complete waste of taxpayers money! Sorry, what was the story again?" says Taxpayers alliance.
"Those fucking darkies, probably. If it wasn't for them we wouldn't need so many planes" says average racist twatty reader


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23054
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
You missed
"I don't understand this so it can't be true"
"Is there a chance to make a feeble political point"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:51 pm
Posts: 1099
Location: Cleethorpes
The Mail- and its readers- absolutely loved this one- a '1940s technology beats all that new fangled crap' style story. Which, in their eyes, really does prove that there's no such thing as progress.

All aboard the polar express: Steam locomotive takes home passengers stranded by snow-delayed modern trains

Quote:
Passengers stranded when modern-day trains fell victim to the freezing weather have been rescued by the crew of a steam engine.

About 100 passengers climbed aboard the first mainline steam locomotive to be built in Britain for almost half a century at London Victoria when electric trains were delayed.

The 1940s technology used to power Tornado, a £3million Peppercorn class A1 Pacific, was able to withstand the snow and ice that brought much of the South East to a standstill on Monday night.


Quote:
It is wonderful that enthusiasts keep steam alive & this is a great Christmas story for the achievments of the group who built the train. There is something magical about the age of steam trains. It takes us back to a time when life was lass complicated & although we now statistically have more "stuff" it is not the things which matter like family, community, good jobs & life quality over quantity. Steam locomotives were taken from us but we didn't necesarily want them taken. We were given dirty diesel locos devoid of personality instead (steam locos were also very dirty but we forget this through our rose tinted glasses) & of course....British Rail (shudder!!) to run them. Nostalgia just like our memories highlight the good stuff but we mentally block the bad things but some things cannot be changed.

- Dave B (Brit ex-pat), Uxbridge, Canada, 25/12/2009 14:32


Quote:
Steam trains are really great, and I'm not a "train buff". I just think they are better at what they do, more reliable and, as just proved, a damn sight better designed than modern diesel-electrics.

if we still had a full railway network, a hell of a lot of car journeys wouldn't be needed, either.

- Steve, Tyneside, 25/12/2009 11:11


So one incident like this proves that steam trains are unquestionably better than the trains we use today?

Quote:
I can tell you where they WEREN'T built. And yes, I posted a missive of my own about the (frankly) stupid engineering of the Eurostar / TGV. However, that would be missing the point:

France is not a third-world country, unlike Britain - and their rail network works a hell of a lot better. Ditto for Germany. I'd say ditto for Japan, but for the fact that the Japanese outclass everyone else. When you are a match for ANY of the above, THEN you can criticise our engineering.

I've lived in Germany for 5 years, and commuted endlessly by train - mainly to Germany, Switzerland, Belgium and France (I've also worked in these countries) - and it only seems to be when I visit England that I experience the "wrong" type of snow, leaves, etc, on the line.

I leave you with a question: Why, when we run electric services here in Europe, are we not affected by these problems?

- Oliver (ex-pat), Duesseldorf, Germany, 24/12/2009 17:04


Oliver (ex-pat) has made a few comments on this story and he comes across as a complete twat. He claims to be a South African ex-pat. I think maybe he could do with his own thread if he continues to be this prolific. I'm fed up of people harping on about how Britain is a third world country, how would they cope when they go to an actual real third world country?

Quote:
The leftie obsession with electricity is a joke. Can you imagine if all those abandoned cars were electric? Just how would they all be re-charged?

Utter madness.

- Martin, Ashford, 24/12/2009 12:13


Aaaargh! Electricity is an evil NooLiebour plot to destroy the world!

Quote:
Poor, poor James. All you say is true, of course BUT the modern locomotive has about as much soul as Gordon Brown! It's sometimes not the arriving that's important, it's the getting there. Where is your soul, man, you sense of romance? A thing of beauty is a joy for ever - Tornado is alive!

- Michael, Longfield, Kent UK, 24/12/2009 0:30


A sense of romance is all well and good, Michael. However when people want to get to places quickly steam trains just won't do the job. I've been on a few and the smaller engines really are slow and underpowered. I enjoy riding on steam trains but they're just not practical for today. Diesel and electric are far more powerful, more reliable and faster. Of course as I tried to point this out, they marked me down:

Quote:
While I believe the Tornado is a massive achievement and would love to ride on a train pulled by it sometime, I cannot understand why people here want to see steam trains return en masse. They are slower and less fuel efficient. The fastest steam engine in the UK, Mallard, reached 125mph but only on a downhill run and had to be rested at its next stop as it ran well beyond its limits. Our modern Intercity trains do 125mph routinely.

- James, Grimsby, 23/12/2009 22:40


Rating currently -91

Quote:
Just stoke the furnace and these beauties keep running.

They are reliable in any weather and, as others have said, there is something about them that really does stir the heart. Not only are they highly functional but they are beautiful too in their colourful livery.

Start building them again, phase out the diesels, build new railway lines and watch people flock to take the train again.

Get our coal mines back in production, create jobs for thousands of people and stop buying inferior fuel at over-inflated prices from abroad.

Will this government do it? Not a snowball's chance in hell. Too many palms being greased and too much pandering to the great unwashed "greenies"!

- Grouse, Somewhere in England, 23/12/2009 21:56


So it's nothing to do with the fact that electric and diesel trains are faster and better, it's all down to a greenie plot.

I would send them a reply but I cannot as they're 'no longer accepting comments on this article'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 4:28 pm
Posts: 242
Location: Bæææææææææærgen
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242047/Google-accused-censoring-website-anti-Islam-searches-fail-appear.html

The mail reports on Google apparantly censoring islamic searches but still suggesting bad things for christianity. Not until the last couple of paragraphs are we told

Quote:
A Google spokesman claimed the strange absence of results was a software problem.
He said: "This is in fact a bug and we're working to fix it as quickly as we can.'

Google also makes suggestions which are in the future tense. Search for 'Islam will' and the results are very balanced, including suggestions such as 'Islam will be destroyed' and 'Islam will take over the world'.





Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:36 am 
thankfully, anyone wanting to read something anti-Islamic can always read it on the DM website


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 2082
One from the Littlejohn school of outrage vs. research:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... nnels.html

Has there been a bit of confusion over Freeview? Arguably, yes - it could have been made clearer. Is it a "con" that will cost everyone at least £170* perpetrated by the BBC and Nu-Liebour? Only in Mail land.

Thankfully, they're getting a fair old kicking in the comments.

*a figure completely made up - they don't even pretend to have a basis for it other than one box will cost that - which is like saying all TVs cost £2000 because one Sony one does


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:20 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:39 pm
Posts: 6003
Location: That London
'Technology industry expert Barry Fox', the rent-a-quote on this story, seems to have previous as far as going a bit OTT is concerned:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/08/16 ... rus_abuse/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:10 pm
Posts: 291
Crikey, I'm currently eight in the green!

Quote:
"What this article doesn't mention is that the Middle Classes will have to pay twice. Once for their box and once more in taxes so that the benefit chavs can get theirs for free, to go with their 42inch plasmas & Playstations!

- Rude Boy, Bedford, 19/1/2010 16:05"

I fear your sarcasm might be over the heads of some 'round these parts.

- Sandra Branton, Margate, England, 19/1/2010 16:56


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Mail and Technophobia
PostPosted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5802
Location: Arslikan EU
Could magnet on head turn you from right to left-handed?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z10lpkaUN8


I did ever so slightly wee my pants when I saw this :lol:

_________________
"Fanaticism is the only form of willpower to which the weak minded and irresolute can rise."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group