CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL: 100 REASONS WHY

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138

and the rebuttal

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/short ... rming.html

I love the way that point 8 argues that "The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favourable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited." and is a reason to discount it....yet other points give suggestions from only one person, but yet we should accept it

And one of their reasons:

"It's natural because I said so"

In fact, most of their "reasons" aren't reasons at all, just irrelevant crap.

Oh yes we can control the sun ! I saw a documentary about it. The Scarecrow, her out of Troy, a Bond Girl, Johnny Storm and that guy who always plays Arab terrorists flew a nuke into it while Harry Starks tried to stop them. Oh wait, that was a film...

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.

Completely relevant points here:



Loads of them are about how much it's costing people, still more are about, as was said above, individuals who don't believe it.
It reads as though it was written by a child:

I don't know if it has already been mentioned, but there is a rebuttal at the New Scientist

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.

The comments on the NS article are filled with 'NO YOU'RE WRONG!' stuff as well.

I've yet to be convinced as to WHY global warming is a lie. As far as I can tell, I see far more vested interests in keeping the status quo than changing it - I don't quite buy that scientists are ALL in the pockets of governments, so they can raise these 'green taxes' we keep being frightened with without seeing them in quite such a dastardly form as previously told.

_________________
http://redsparrows.tumblr.com

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/vie ... your-heart



JUST ONE CUP OF COFFEE CAN HARM YOUR HEART










then there is the bit at the bottom negating the whole thing:

_________________
Join the Mailwatch Daily Express "Political cartoonist of the year" Paul Thomas Facebook group

So one cup of coffee can damage your heart, provided you have one cup of coffee perhaps six or seven times in quick succession.

_________________
"Even when you're a super-computer with an IQ of 2000 it's brown trousers time."

Reclaiming "methinks" for the nation

Latest blog post - 2011 - a review (updated 07/10)

If you fall off a multi-storey car park the first 100 feet are harmless, it's just the last 6 inches that are dangerous...

_________________
Where there is great doubt, there will be great awakening; small doubt, small awakening, no doubt, no awakening.

I read this in the Metro this morning, where the focus in the headline was very definitely on espresso. Only at the very end did they note that a 'regular' cup of filter coffee contains more caffeine than an espresso, as you might expect. I guess as Metro is distributed in cities they're trying to go for the 'urban professional espresso-drinking twunt' demographic.

I don't know why people bother to buy those coffees from Starbucks, etc and carry them to the office as every office has coffee! Its not exactly posing either...ooh, get me with my coffee!

_________________
Join the Mailwatch Daily Express "Political cartoonist of the year" Paul Thomas Facebook group

I blame Friends.

I wouldn't buy Starbucks, but I have been known to bring in a coffee from the stall in our local station (which does a mean cappucino) just because it's way better than the muck we get in the office.

cappuccino = over-priced adult milkshake.

Although "over-priced adult milkshake" sounds suspiciously like a euphemism.

http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/vie ... t-strokes-


CHOCOLATE EVERY DAY 'HELPS PREVENT STROKES'


bottom bit:

_________________
Join the Mailwatch Daily Express "Political cartoonist of the year" Paul Thomas Facebook group