It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 10:46 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:45 pm
Posts: 764
Location: On the edge
I doubt many more will be added to this thread - extraordinary to see them run this story so close to an election.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... error.html

Tories in 'dodgy' statistics row over false claims of soaring teenage pregnancies

Dodgy shouldn't be in inverted commas. They seriously fucked up.

Quote:
A spokesman said: 'A decimal point was left out in a calculation. It makes no difference at all to the conclusions of a wide-ranging report which shows that Labour have consistently let down the poorest in Britain.'


Makes a pretty massive difference actually. If someone can't tell the difference between 5.4% and 54% when concocting a smear campaign then I don't really want them in power.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23056
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
Unless they are calculating the rise in my pension...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:55 pm
Posts: 534
Quote:
'A decimal point was left out in a calculation. It makes no difference at all to the conclusions ...

Image

_________________
Image flavors.me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 pm
Posts: 23056
Location: In la France profonde, without personal transport...
:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:56 pm
Posts: 515
When I was at school I broke the 400m world record. I had put the decimal point in the wrong place but who cares?!?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 11:31 pm
Posts: 5802
Location: Arslikan EU
Image

From the Mail editorial team.

_________________
"Fanaticism is the only form of willpower to which the weak minded and irresolute can rise."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:50 pm
Posts: 2844
Did the Tories cover up the truth about Hillsborough? As officials block the release of Cabinet papers on the football disaster, families of the victims raise a disturbing theory...

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z1WD1VWXVU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:21 pm
Posts: 3801
Location: Magic Swirling Ship
Quote:
Conspiracy theories abound on Merseyside. One even suggests that Mrs Thatcher felt indebted to the South Yorkshire Police for their supportive handling of the miners’ strike a few years earlier and so, in some way, allowed an attempt to shift blame towards the supporters.


It's a pity the term "conspiracy theory" these days has connotations with ridiculous suggestions and whacky individuals or groups putting forward ideas for the reasons for all manner of events because there's nothing outlandish about this one. She visited Hillsborough a day later, a day after that was the infamous front page of the Sun. Probably a coincidence but... politicians and Murdoch publications....we now know all about their cosy little relationship.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:01 pm
Posts: 282
I would'nt put anything past Thatcher. In my opinion, she deliberately engineered the Falklands war for her own purposes. Look at the facts, by the end of '81 she was in serious trouble, unemployment had rocketed, the opinion polls were putting her at an incredibly low level, what do do? simple have a war. Dictators have often used foreign wars to divert attention from problems at home.

It was known at the time that the Argentinians were making noises about sovereignty of the islands so she chose that moment to announce massive cuts in the Royal Navy, and withdrew the only naval presence in the area, HMS Endurance, practically inviting the invasion. Contrast this with James Callaghan's response when faced with a similar situation in 1977, he just sent the Ark Royal to patrol around for a couple of weeks. Result, no lives lost, no fuss, no war.

The ploy worked, the bum wiping newspapers exploded in an orgy of jingoistic crap and she won the following years general election.

She used the police like stormtroopers in the miners strike so it fits in that she covered up for their bad handling of this tragedy by shifting the blame onto the Liverpool fans, after all, they were just unimportant Labour voting working class oiks werent they?

Yet another one on of the endless list of reasons why I HATE THAT EVIL BITCH!!!!!! :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 1:23 pm
Posts: 4954
Location: West Midlands
Not just that.

1. The British Nationality Act. a horribly racist piece of legislation that was designed to limit Brit nationality to those who could prove British-born ancestry within 5 generations (fair enough, Labour had introduced similar legislation in the late '60s). The driving force was a belief that we'd be inundated with Hong Kong Chinese following the handover but it accidentally made most Falklanders stateless.

2. Nicholas 'cunt' Ridley visited the islands in 1981, urging them to accept the Argentine-proposed 'buyback' plan. He was quoted as saying he'd mourn the loss of the Falklands less than the loss of British holdings in France back in medieval times, because at least you got decent wine out of France.

3. The withdrawl of RN patrol of the area, as mentioned. And cutting supply to the islands from 6-monthly to annually.

4. By 1981 the Tories were doing disastrouslly in opinion polls.

I have personal reasons for believing that the Falklands are British territory (and deserve to remain so - the islanders identify as British, they were settled and populated by Brits, and sooner or later we'll need the oilfield they're sitting on and access to Antarctica); and that the servicemen who died retaking the islands died in a just cause.

But it sticks in my craw that the war may have been engineered. Hell, I'm a history graduate, I know that sometimes things just happen (the 'cock-up' theory of history, as opposed to the KBD one). Yes. Thatcher's response was the right one. But if she was acting as Ozymandias, engineering a war she knew ....

....

No, to hell with that. The Falklands were a bloody difficult fight to win. A supply line 12,000 miles long and as vulnerable as hell? In the middle of an Antarctic winter? Only a total lunatic would pick that fight.

...

Hang on...

_________________
Ten seconds... the pain begins.

Fifteen seconds... you can't breathe.

Twenty seconds... you give up and turn off the Jeremy Vine show.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:24 pm
Posts: 3839
They're always so quick to call for 'a debate' on other subjects, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 1:34 am
Posts: 5399
Location: A town near the Sea
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... -want.html

They are attacking some kind of Toryism in this, of course the voters don't want Old style Toryism.... some voters like the Tory members they asked want old style Toryism. They probably also want homosexuality banned and for anyone without a white face sent "home". So we don't tend to listen.

Nice to see the membership still lives in a 1930's that never actually existed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:03 pm
Posts: 170
mattomac wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2031222/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-Old-style-Toryism-just-voters-want.html

They are attacking some kind of Toryism in this, of course the voters don't want Old style Toryism.... some voters like the Tory members they asked want old style Toryism. They probably also want homosexuality banned and for anyone without a white face sent "home". So we don't tend to listen.

Nice to see the membership still lives in a 1930's that never actually existed.

this fits comfortably with the mail's agenda; a back-to-the-future golden age that never was.

the mail has been in one huge fucking strop since nov.22, 1990. not one tory leader - not one - has measured up to the supreme being that is thatcher, in their view and this survey offers ammo aplenty in their war to convert cameron and the tory leadership to 'traditional' values.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:01 pm
Posts: 282
Thing is that the supreme being Thatcher (spit) did'nt have traditional values anyway. She imported an alien economic philosophy from the USA based on the moneterist theories of Milton Friedman and she just weakened British institutions and sold off national assets to froeign multinationals and get rich quick merchants. The result was we lost our traditional manufacturing base and became dependant on imports.

Also, she deregulated broadcasting, allowing more filth than ever, the kind of stuff the DM gets riled about. I've said this before, but the DM likes to live in the 50s, but economically, the 50s were based on a state interventionist, socialist model. If you tried to go back there, it would explode with apopleptic rage - "THE UNIONS TAKING OVER THE COUNTRY" "RAILWAYS, BUSES AND UTILITIES BACK IN THE INEFFICIENT PUBLIC SECTOR" etc etc.

In many ways the traditional, relatively orderly Britain, without an underclass, which the DM constantly seems to want was wrecked by that EVIL BITCH WHO I FUCKING HATE!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mail vs The Tories?!
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Posts: 10513
Location: Durham
mr angry manchester wrote:
Thing is that the supreme being Thatcher (spit) did'nt have traditional values anyway.


Nothing traditional about Thatch, she was a radical who made Heath and all the other post war Conservative leaders look quite left wing.

_________________
That subtle admixture of the absurd and the surreally plausible...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group