Page 228 of 249

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:50 am
by Oblomov
youngian wrote:
Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:44 am
The latest Brexit tinfoil hat conspiracy doing the rounds is the we legally left the EU 3 years ago and the Deep State are covering it up. This twat has heard it and is whistling it back
Funny how when I declare I'm a sovereign citizen, HMRC sends the heavies round for the tax money.

Fuck off Boris.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:52 am
by cycloon
You're right, the terms are in no way what people were promised. Because you promised them the earth, and said it'd be easy.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2019 12:56 pm
by Big Arnold
Yep.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:50 pm
by Boiler
We conclude with concern that these two investigations by the Commissioner in rapid succession demonstrate a pattern of behaviour by Mr Johnson. While there is no suggestion that he has at any time tried deliberately to conceal the extent of his interests, this latest breach reinforces the view which we expressed in our previous Report, that he has displayed “an over-casual attitude towards obeying the rules of the House”, in conjunction with “a lack of effective organisation within [his] office”
https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/c ... tAnchor000

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:54 am
by Boiler

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 9:56 am
by The Red Arrow
Must be. It's in the S*n.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:34 am
by MisterMuncher
Hard to get a cock on both sides of one glass.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:41 pm
by Big Arnold
Daily Telegraph forced to correct false Brexit claim by Boris Johnson

Newspaper removes claim but defends MP saying his piece ‘could not be reasonably read as a serious, in-depth analysis’
In its defence the Telegraph said Johnson was “entitled to make sweeping generalisations based on his opinions”.
Tell lies as it is usually called.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... is-johnson

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:16 pm
by Oblomov
"Newspaper removes claim but defends MP saying his piece ‘could not be reasonably read as a serious, in-depth analysis’"

It bloody well can if you've a long and established history of purporting to be a paper of record and mouthpiece for the Conservative party.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:43 pm
by Watchman
And it was written by a bloke who until not too long ago held the high office of Foreign Secretary

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 6:11 pm
by mattomac
I’m shocked how weaselling that is.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:47 pm
by Cyclist
You'd better get used to the modern Torygraph. Gone are the days when it was an actual newspaper containing actual journalism, albeit with a Tory slant. These days it's just the Daily Express for people who can do jiuned-up writing.

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:09 pm
by Bones McCoy
Cyclist wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:47 pm
You'd better get used to the modern Torygraph. Gone are the days when it was an actual newspaper containing actual journalism, albeit with a Tory slant. These days it's just the Daily Express for people who can do jiuned-up writing.
I've seen it describes as "Boris Johnson's blog".

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:48 am
by Oblomov
Cyclist wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:47 pm
You'd better get used to the modern Torygraph. Gone are the days when it was an actual newspaper containing actual journalism, albeit with a Tory slant. These days it's just the Daily Express for people who can do jiuned-up writing.
I suspected it was that when it had the cavalcade of cunts that was Telegraph Blogs during Cameron's government, is it somehow even worse now?

Re: Boris Johnson

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:32 am
by Andy McDandy
Rot set in when the Barclays bought it. Expenses scandal was their last hurrah.