Page 741 of 754

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2020 3:26 pm
by youngian
He was crap, he surrounded himself with crap, lazy, talentless sycophants who only told him what he wanted to hear, and he kept people who could have made a difference - including old friends - at a distance so he didn’t have to consider for a moment he was wrong.

Its been noted Jezza has Tweeted next to nothing about Corvid and is rarely seen wearing a mask. Most recently at a wake with anarchists sticking it to the man.

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:31 am
by crabcakes_windermere
I see someone's let Len out again


Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:02 am
by youngian
The only problem with Lewis Goodall’s report on Newsnight was absence of a credible grownup to criticise of Starmer. He was just handing Len, Diane and Lavery rope. Just like Tory Brexiters; No self-reflection on mistakes let alone admission of grotesque failure that stares them in the face. Everything is someone else’s fault especially Remoaners like Starmer. Like Biden, Keir's not playing so they can all fuck off.

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:42 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Would it kill the bastard to shave?

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:34 am
by crabcakes_windermere
I’ve never been able to tell whether it’s a shit shave, or a really shit beard

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:20 pm
by youngian
Sorry to Peter and rest of them before they start moaning

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:49 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
Not "I apologise for what I said", but "I apologise if what I said hurt your feelings".

Weasel words. We all know what he meant.

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:21 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Why are they banging on about Mandelson in 2020 anyway?

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:22 pm
by oboogie
Tubby Isaacs wrote:
Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:21 pm
Why are they banging on about Mandelson in 2020 anyway?
Mandelson was also on the programme and McCluskey was asked to respond to something Mandelson had said.

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:30 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Ah, fair enough.

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:13 am
by The Weeping Angel
When it comes to Len McCluskey Ben Bradshaw sums him up for me.


Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:24 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Ouch.


Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:41 pm
by Boiler
"Starmer must go." Is that how it works?

Seriously though, things just get worse and worse here and the Tories keep leading?

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:47 pm
by davidjay
People won't change their minds overnight, nor even in six months. Corbyn-IRA-terrorist lover will take a lot of wiping out.

Re: Labour, Generally.

Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:01 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
A lot of "Other" there. Labour losing a few to the Greens? How many of those are going to follow through and not vote tactically v eg PM Gove in 2024?

Having said that, I think Labour could do with voting against a couple of the things they're abstaining on, for tactical reasons if nothing else.