Political talk from outside of the UK
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
By mikey mikey
Posts
#431592
lord_kobel wrote:And the BBC are reporting that Russian missiles hit Iran, rather than ISIS... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34479873


Well not quite. They are reporting that unnamed US officials have accused Russians of that. See below.

Four Russian cruise missiles fired at Syria from the Caspian Sea landed in Iran, unnamed US officials say.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34479873

Quite ironic really. You "straw man" accuse me of believing everything Putin and Assad say (which I don't) and then proceed to believe the words of an anonymous US official.

Hence why this reminds me of Bill O'Reilly during the Iraq invasion.
 
By Littlejohn's brain
Membership Days Posts
#431595
Nor did the article I linked to say Putin was supporting just that Putin wasn't just targeting ISIS.
 
By mikey mikey
Posts
#431597
Littlejohn's brain wrote:Nor did the article I linked to say Putin was supporting just that Putin wasn't just targeting ISIS.


Er..I am sorry, the article may not have but you clearly posted this.

Littlejohn's brain wrote:By giving ISIS an air force?
 
By Littlejohn's brain
Membership Days Posts
#437531
It says: ‘We, men, do not consider men who love men to be men. This is the rule.
‘But there are exceptions. There are gays who have earned our respect and the right to remain real men in our eyes.’


I suppose the rabid homophobia appeals to the Russian market.
 
By Littlejohn's brain
Membership Days Posts
#447635
When it comes to Russia it's time for some real realism

http://nobsrussia.com/2016/02/25/real-realism/

Beware the snake oil known as foreign policy “realism” or “pragmatism,” at least when it comes to Russia. Every time I read something from a “realist” or “pragmatist” it always starts out more or less fine, but then soon degenerates into blaming all Putin’s bad behavior entirely on the West, and suggesting a “compromise” that basically amounts to giving the Kremlin whatever it wants, whatever the case. Usually these people portray themselves as moderates, objective observers standing in no-man’s land between rabid neocons in the West and Kremlin-supported neo-imperialists in Russia. Yet one cannot help but notice how quickly their arguments degenerate into a collection of tried and true Kremlin talking points, and their “solutions” require the West or its allies to make all the concessions while Russia isn’t bound to reciprocate.
 
By Bones McCoy
Membership Days Posts
#481762
Silkyman wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/25/russia-unveils-satan-2-missile-powerful-enough-to-wipe-out-uk-fr/


Texas seems the obvious choice there.
 
By Timbo
Membership Days Posts
#481763
Silkyman wrote:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/25/russia-unveils-satan-2-missile-powerful-enough-to-wipe-out-uk-fr/

I seem to recall from a documentary many years ago, we developed a ridiculously powerful missile ourselves after the USSR test-fired the Tsar Bomba. There is a pretty major flaw in taking the 'bigger=better' approach with nukes, once you get to this level, they're actually pretty shit at destroying things on the ground, as a huge amount of the energy ends up going straight out in a plume into space. This is why the US, UK and France use missiles that fly up into the high atmosphere, then break apart and rain down up to 11 independently-targeted warheads to carpet bomb a given territory. Gives the most effective scorchio:rouble ratio.
 
By bluebellnutter
Membership Days Posts
#481765
Russia unveils 'Satan 2' missile powerful enough to 'wipe out UK, France or Texas'


Obligatory Texas joke #1
I thought it was called Homebase these days?

Obligatory Texas joke #2
I never liked "Say What You Want" anyway.
 
By Safe_Timber_Man
Membership Days Posts
#481768
I might be being naive here but I'm really not sure it matters. We, Europe, the US, Russia etc all have enough nukes to ensure that if a nuclear war did happen then the world would simply be turned to rubble. Yes, Russia could raze London but by the same token we could obliterate Moscow. There are no winners. It's all just muscle flexing and dick waving.

If that poll lead is accurate it wouldn’t […]

SPOTY

Sports Personality of the Year An old and tired f[…]

Liz Jones

A calibrated (sic) attack on Jo Cox by a lady who […]

News you won't see on the BBC

Was chatting with an old friend today, and we wang[…]