[Beast of Bolsover]

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/201 ... s#comments

" BROWN'S £400 RAID ON MIDDLE EARNERS"

secret plans

My God! It must be true!

to “hammer” millions of middle-income families with crippling income tax increases were exposed yesterday.

Official figures revealed the Treasury needs the equivalent of an extra £400 a year in tax from every household
in Britain to ease spiralling Government borrowing.

The sky is falling ,the sky is falling. How will every single household survive?£400 pounds!!!!!!!!

a Treasury minister at Labour’s Bournemouth conference let slip the growing desire within her party to squeeze the higher-rate taxpayers.

Huh? higher-rate what what what now?

Angela Eagle...(said)... Labour should seriously address the “challenge” of raising taxes for above-average earners.

“I for one hope we’re going to do a bit of talking about that,” she said, raising fears that Labour is poised to return to the swingeing tax regime of the party’s socialist past.

Oh I see , above average , yes the decent hard-working middle-class that keep the very fabric of this nation together. The sky is falling. And isn't Anna Eagle some kind of lesbian pervert? Her lesbo driven hope is cast iron evidence of secret plans.

opponents say the secret tax plans give the lie to Mr Brown’s attempt in his conference speech to portray himself as on the side of Middle Britain families who “work hard, save and play by the rules”.

Yes exactly.The man is a sham ,secret plans and opponents prove every single household will pay £400.Every single household earns a middle wage at least . I'm sure the immigrants get £25000 in benefits alone , and my cleaner . It's Brown's Poll Tax I tell you ,and the poll tax was a good and fair idea.

Tory Shadow Chancellor George Osborne said: “One of Gordon Brown’s own Treasury ministers has revealed the truth. Labour wants to hit top-rate taxpayers further, even though they are reeling from a decade of stealth taxes.

Yes ,the voice of reason .The Tories will save the middle income earners . They speak for the oppressed little man at the bottom of the ladder .

Government debt rose to a record £9.1billion

And that's good solid UK billions too , not some slimy foreign measure . Probably . I don't know , I heard at the end of 2006 general government debt was £571.8 billion, equivalent to 43.5 per cent of GDP ,and double that elsewhere, so someone somewhere must understand all these figures . It's all double-dutch to me (grrrrr...the Dutch).....but anyway , look , billions , scary scary billions . Bring back Norman Lamont , he'll save us.

Maurice Fitzpatrick, of City accountants Grant Thornton, said the Treasury may need to cut borrowing by £8billion, the equivalent of £400 a year for Britain’s 20 million households.

There you go , someone who understands . And he said every household and £400 in the same breath. That "may" be "equivalent" to absolute fact.

Ms Eagle – Westminster’s first openly lesbian MP.....

Is she? Never crossed my mind to think whether she was or not or if it was relevant.Filthy pervert corrupting our money , I mean kids.

....spoke out in answer to a question about how Labour should respond to Lib Dem tax plans to “hammer” two million households with incomes over £70,000.

See , more proof . The secret plans were cunningly disguised documents in someone else's question and forced Ms ( yes Ms , not Mrs or Miss mind you )Eagle to expose her depraved money lust. And we are all equivalent to the two million households with incomes over £70,000.Maybe some pop band could sing a song about being a one in ten . I know in the 80's it really made a difference when they sang about the one in ten work-shy benefit scroungers ,the so called unemployed ,all earning an equivalent average middle class income of £70000.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance

Oh blimey , I think I am going to orgasm.

Meanwhile a filthy pinko writes

MIDDLE EARNERS

26.09.07, 10:16am

The 'secret plans' referred to in this article (if they indeed exist) refer to people with incomes in excess of £70,000 a year. When the majority of the population before tax earn less than £25,000 a year by no stretch of the imagination can £70,000 a year be described as the income of middle earners.

This article is very disingenuousand and could accurately be described as misleading and meaningless propaganda.

In fact middle and low earners could benefit if taxation on those earning more than £70,000 a year (and that would include MP's and government ministers) was increased a bit.

• Posted by: THe_Nickster •

I am an equivalent one in ten
A number on a Harrods list
I am an equivalent one in ten
Even though I don`t exist
Nobody knows me
Even though I'm always theoretically there
A statistic, a reminder
Of a completely bona fide honest to goodness cross my heart and hope to die secret plan that doesn't care

[mattomac]

She did not respond to such a question at all. I was at the fucking fringe meeting, along with about 10 others.

She was discussing at the time that we shouldn't be ashamed of taxing the richest in this country, the people who could afford it, I think if i'm right it was in relation to me and someone else mentioning top up fees and how the richest don't mind paying for there kids education.

[Beast of Bolsover]

She did not respond to such a question at all. I was at the fucking fringe meeting, along with about 10 others.

She was discussing at the time that we shouldn't be ashamed of taxing the richest in this country, the people who could afford it, I think if i'm right it was in relation to me and someone else mentioning top up fees and how the richest don't mind paying for there kids education.

You f****** liar. The Express printed the whole story . Would they lie? I ask you .It's all there .





*may I shake your hand sir*

EDIT..... For fucks sake please sign up to the Express Have Your Say and add it to the comments. Their mods seem non-existent practically . Would yours get through?

[Run]

, . , , .
, . . , . , . , . ,. , . .
. . , , , . ,
. , , .

[mattomac]

She did not respond to such a question at all. I was at the fucking fringe meeting, along with about 10 others.

She was discussing at the time that we shouldn't be ashamed of taxing the richest in this country, the people who could afford it, I think if i'm right it was in relation to me and someone else mentioning top up fees and how the richest don't mind paying for there kids education.

You f****** liar. The Express printed the whole story . Would they lie? I ask you .It's all there .





*may I shake your hand sir*

EDIT..... For fucks sake please sign up to the Express Have Your Say and add it to the comments. Their mods seem non-existent practically . Would yours get through?

I wouldn't want them to find out that the Express lies, It's all the more fun when the majority of this country votes Labour back in and you can look at their faces and laugh.