Page 1236 of 1273

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2019 6:26 pm
by MisterMuncher
youngian wrote:
Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:28 am
Cunt who made Michael Winner look good dies. Good.
Not someone who worked as a cunt. Cunt.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 11:08 am
by Andy McDandy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... avile.html

Back to prince Andrew. Squaddie don't rat on squaddie. She was legal. Can't trust the word of a whore anyway. The way they were dressed, they deserved it. Haven't we all been there?

Fucking sweaty, oafish, misogynistic, leering, creeping, groping, entitled, loathsome CUNT.

And prince Andrew can fuck off and all.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 11:19 am
by The Red Arrow
Mercifully, the M*il's adblockerblocker saves me from looking at such crap. But I can't help but wonder if 'Littlejohn. R' resides in a certain dead paedo's address book, alongside 'Young. T', 'Neal. A' and 'York. Duke of' ?

Carry on, chaps.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:06 pm
by youngian
What the hell is he talking about? Perhaps Littlejohn has the low down on the life of army generals in the 21st century. Or he just thought 'Melchett from Blackadder' ha ha that's what all generals are like.
I’ve no idea precisely what he did in the Falklands. He may not have been the reincarnation of Henry V at Agincourt, but at least he was there, flying a helicopter.

That’s more than can be said for some of the gentlemen’s club generals currently queueing around the block to put the boot in.

Most of them are safely tucked up at the MoD in Whitehall, pushing Dinky tanks round sandpits and playing with Airfix model destroyers in their baths.
Firebombing houses in Notting Hill will sort 'them' out
And what if, through some kind of time tunnel, today’s street posses clashed with their 1950s counterparts? My money would be on the Teds, machetes or no machetes.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:25 pm
by Safe_Timber_Man
What is it with him always jumping to the defence of nonce's? Somebody needs to take a look at him.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:24 am
by Andy McDandy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... early.html

Blah blah why arent we lynching them?

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 8:02 am
by The Red Arrow
Because we're not a tinpot dictatorship beholden to a corrupt press, Dickie...oh, wait.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 8:29 am
by youngian
Until the next time, when some other Islamist nutjob takes a few more innocent lives and the police again claim they have no idea what motivated him.

Littlejohn often has the answer when these shock attacks occur; mentally ill lone wolves.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:07 am
by Andy McDandy
The police generally have a very good idea what motivates terrorists. It tends to get ignored by the likes of Dickie, because it's not "He's a wrong'un, find a tree".

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 9:27 am
by The Red Arrow
It would be an interesting experiment to spend a whole day making decisions and interacting with people based upon the answer to what would Jack Regan do?*






*other Dickheroes(tm) are available

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 7:31 am
by Andy McDandy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... Boris.html

Why did they have to make this election about politics, cries the man child.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:22 pm
by youngian
If dumping Jezza was the price of cobbling together a coalition, Labour would throw him under the bus in a heartbeat.
We wish

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:32 pm
by Boiler
Not. A. Chance.

And rather like that sloppy journalistic shorthand of "-gate", can we dump "throw under a bus" too...?

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:51 am
by Andy McDandy
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... Wales.html

Dickie sneers at "stupid foreign names" for storms, deriding them as a pointless American import (irony alert!), the goes on to say that he was a big fan of police commissioners (a stupid pointless American import if there ever was one, replacing functional but dull police boards with political appointees, nobody cared, and it was all because Osborne thought they sounded all butch like off Batman) until they started showing how pointless they were. Then a riff on topical comedy with Frank Spencer.

Re: Richard Littlejohn

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:41 am
by MisterMuncher
And why Piet, not Pete?
Because the names are selected in rotation by the British, Irish and Dutch met offices, working in a collaboration, you fucking dullard.