Discussion of article from the Mail's columnists and RightMinds contributors
:sunglasses: 50 % ❤ 17.8 % :thumbsup: 8.5 % :grinning: 11 % 🧥 1.7 % 🙏 4.2 % 😟 5.9 % :cry: 0.8 %
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
By crabcakes_windermere
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#594723
Thing is, they never really wanted them to bugger off. What they actually wanted was for them both to stay exactly where they were and just silently absorb decades of bullying and racism, ideally resulting in a nice juicy divorce from the stress and - even better - Harry then remarrying a white girl who they could then idolise to really ram home the message. That being that they're a bunch of immense cunts.
 
By AOB
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#594865
There will have been a load of shit going on "behind the scenes" over the past few years. Quite probably a lot of openly racist, cruel and nasty comments have been made about Meghan to Harry by various Royals, some possibly in her presence. I'm basing this conjecture on the fact that Princess Michael of Kent in late 2017 chose to wear a Blackamoor brooch at a function Meghan attended. (She gave one of those non-apology apologies of the 'I'm sorry YOU were offended" ilk). The Royals know full well how every single item of clothing and accessory will be perceived. If that kind of provocation of Meghan is visible to the public then it's reasonable to assume much worse has gone on "behind closed doors". Harry saw how they behaved towards his mum and know that if he gave them the heads-up about getting off then it would have been stopped by whatever means.
By Andy McDandy
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#595118
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... arkle.html

More filler and speculation. It's clear that Geordie Grieg has told each of his columnists to spam the hell out of this "story" and produce their own variant takes on it. Some of his copy could have come from Mark Steel, and would have been funnier if it had. Also, his obsession with cramming in hastily wiki'd facts into everything really grates. At least he didn't feel it necessary to explain to his readers how Pointless works.
 
By The Red Arrow
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#595131
Would that be the same Wiki that doesn't accept the Daily M*il as a source of information, for... er... factual reasons?
 
By youngian
Membership Days Posts
#595138
Andy McDandy wrote:
Tue Jan 14, 2020 8:21 am
Also, his obsession with cramming in hastily wiki'd facts into everything really grates. At least he didn't feel it necessary to explain to his readers how Pointless works.
Is that LJ? An increasingly large space appears once his copy is subbed down to avoid repetition from this and previous articles. Just cut and paste some 'background' to fill it.
By Andy McDandy
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#595485
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailym ... tions.html

Yes, losers consent is a thing. So is magnanimity in victory, rule of law, and governing for all.
Watchman liked this
 
By davidjay
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#595491
They don't want democracy, or at least they dont want the form of democracy that's served us well for centuries.

They want a one-off binding election for a dictator who will implement the sort of bar-room philosophy edicts to MBGA with no opposition and with dissent crushed.
  • 1
  • 1236
  • 1237
  • 1238
  • 1239
  • 1240
  • 1241

Got my ballot today. 1. Keir Starmer 2.Lisa Nandy […]

Jan Moir

Priti Patel must be the first person to have been […]

Boris Johnson

Yesterday Boris made it clear that getting a trade[…]

Jeremy Corbyn.

This is rather excellent. https://medium.com/@[…]