Page 3 of 7

Re: Andrew Pierce - Fuckwit

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:32 pm
by DTR
Well that is a surprise, a right wing AstroTurf group that includes Micheal Gove, Matthew Elliot & Tim Montgomerie on it's advisory board does some analysis and finds that miraculously the data shows there to be left wing bias at the BBC.

Re: Andrew Pierce - Fuckwit

Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 6:38 pm
by Tubby Isaacs
Tim Fenton is onto them:

http://zelo-street.blogspot.co.uk/2012/ ... forum.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:09 pm
by The Weeping Angel
here's a hatchet job on Micheal Dugher Pierce wrote in November

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... amity.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:12 am
by Messianic Trees
The right are worried:

Image

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z2LiQa66cX" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:30 am
by Abernathy
Andrew Pierce there, pretending not to understand satire because he knows the Mailtards don't.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:54 pm
by Fozzy
It's quite encouraging when they resort to personal attacks - it shows they're running scared.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:57 pm
by Malcolm Armsteen
I think they're just asserting type. They chuck in all the spleen they can just to be sure.
But yes, they must be concerned given the polls.

I want to hear from Ez if the story I've read is true, that the Labour vote is being eroded by tactical voting towards the Lib Dems to prevent a Tory win.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:05 pm
by The Weeping Angel
I have a bad feeling this is going to be a repeat of the Richmond by-election

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:54 am
by davidjay
Have they thrown that shit at him before any other election he's fought?

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:17 am
by oboogie
Malcolm Armsteen wrote:I want to hear from Ez if the story I've read is true, that the Labour vote is being eroded by tactical voting towards the Lib Dems to prevent a Tory win.
I've just read a Mailtard claiming that Labour supporters are tactically voting UKIP to hammer the coalition. No idea if that's true.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:25 am
by Malcolm Armsteen
Could be both or either.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:56 am
by oboogie
I understand tactical voting as a concept...but for UKIP?!!?

If I had to, I'd vote Tory to keep those bastards out. Thankfully I've never been put in a position where I had to make that decision.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 5:03 pm
by Lord Brett
We all seem to have missed this story about Andrew Pierce smealing Gordon Brown over a massive personal expenses claim that was, guess what, completely imaginary.

There is a tiny correction online and in today's paper, naturally, far smaller than the orginal lie and pointedly missing the word 'apology'.

http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/regr ... -expenses/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Brown should sue their arses off.

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:32 pm
by The Weeping Angel
He should just to make them squeal

Re: Andrew Pierce

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:27 pm
by Messianic Trees
Why gay weddings do NOT advance the cause of equality

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/artic ... z2xMjvTwyI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;