Discussion of article from the Mail's columnists and RightMinds contributors
:sunglasses: 50 % :grinning: 40 % 😟 10 %
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
By Big Arnold
Membership Days Posts
#551989
Boiler wrote:
Sun Aug 19, 2018 4:55 pm
lord_kobel wrote:
Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:19 pm
[...] when the internet was a happier, simpler time before the alt-right nazis
You clearly never used Usenet :roll:
The September that never ended
 
By Bones McCoy
Membership Days Posts
#552001
Boiler wrote:
Sun Aug 19, 2018 4:55 pm
lord_kobel wrote:
Sun Aug 19, 2018 1:19 pm
[...] when the internet was a happier, simpler time before the alt-right nazis
You clearly never used Usenet :roll:
alt.politics.libertarian - mostly harmless when compared to Breitbart.
 
By Big Arnold
Membership Days Posts
#552795
'I'm proof diet pills can work,' says SARAH VINE. But s̶o̶c̶i̶e̶t̶y̶ Daily Mail must stop seeing fat people as greedy failures who deserve to be punished
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... storm.html
 
By youngian
Membership Days Posts
#552799
The self-loathing is key. Fat people are often defensive or defiant about their condition. But that is rarely because we enjoy being overweight. We are sick of being judged for our inability to keep the pounds off, and frustrated by a culture that equates thin-ness with moral virtue.
Is self-loathing key to Brexit English nationalism?
French President Emmanuel Macron says he will do nothing to help the British Government push through the Chequers agreement in Brussels.

Why would anyone imagine any different? France is at the heart of the EU project; it is in Macron’s interests to make our exit as painful and humiliating as possible to ensure none of the other nations whose voters favour leaving — Italy, Greece, Portugal — dare follow suit.
 
By MisterMuncher
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#552809
Well, shit, Sarah. If only there was something anyone could have done about the clusterfuck negotiations became, say delayed the start of the negotiations until Britain had a goal and a gameplan, or presented an informed choice of the many types of Brexit before the referendum, or even realised on a vague level how the EU functions, or devoted a second of thought to the Irish Border/GFA, or...

But of course, there was no way to avoid any of that, and now those bastard frogs won't lie down and do whatever suits us and damn their own interests.

It's so bloody unfair. Perhaps you could hold your breath until you get your way. Ask the hubby to join you. Cheers.
Watchman, youngian liked this
 
By Safe_Timber_Man
Membership Days Posts
#553765
Any other situation and Vine would be dismissing her as a scheming harlot...


Politics is the enemy of a happy marriage: SARAH VINE says PR guru embroiled in Bojo saga is 'no scheming airhead' and reveals the struggle facing those inside the Westminster bubble

Full disclosure: I know Carrie Symonds. Not hugely well, but enough to know that she is very far removed from the woman she’s been cast as since news of the whole Boris Johnson saga broke at the weekend.

Yes, she’s beautiful and vivacious and loves Abba (don’t we all?), but she’s also clever, funny, passionate about politics — and very brave.

After all, it’s largely because of Carrie that John Worboys, the black cab rapist who was convicted in 2009 of attacks on 12 women, is still behind bars.

She campaigned against his early release at no small cost to herself, effectively giving a voice to the 100 or so victims the police believe he may have drugged and assaulted, and helping to ensure that he never gets the chance to do it again.

Of course, that does not mean that she has never made any mistakes.

Nevertheless, the way she has been cast as a scheming airhead is unfair and not at all representative of the woman I know.

In any case, this is not just a story about two people. It’s about the whole pressure of modern politics — and why, ultimately, a career at Westminster can all too often be the enemy of a happy marriage.

The corridors of Parliament are littered with the corpses of failed marriages. It’s not just the obvious reasons: the long hours; the late-night votes; the drinking culture; the endless travel; the nights away from home; the birthdays, sports days and school plays missed in favour of that all-important vote.

It’s also the fact that, however down-to-earth you may be to start, once you get inside the Palace of Westminster, MPs are treated like a demigod by a culture that operates like a gentleman’s club in Mayfair. Meanwhile, at home, they’re still expected to take out the bins.

If you haven’t got your head screwed on tightly, ordinary life can quickly start to seem rather dull — especially when you’re pulling up to a dark house and dozing partner after yet another late-night sitting, only to leave before dawn for a very important breakfast meeting. And as I know from experience, it’s not always easy for spouses either.

Yes, there are certain advantages — not to mention privileges — to being a bit-part player in the great game of politics.

But it can be bittersweet at times. It’s not just the loneliness or the endless fund-raisers; it’s also the close scrutiny — amplified more than ever before in this social media age — that comes with the job and the inevitable impact it has on any children whom you may have.

It’s the way some people feel they can treat you as somehow sub-human simply because they happen to disagree with your partner’s party or politics; how friendships can and do suffer because of political disagreements; the pain of seeing your partner and the person you love being misunderstood and misrepresented; and the constant, rolling stress of it all which, even for the most resilient among us, can be mentally challenging.

Indeed, the amazing thing about Westminster in general is how many marriages do survive the brutalising effects of politics.

That despite all the personal and public trials MPs and their partners face, so many of us stick together through it all and, in many cases, emerge stronger. I don’t say any of this as a plea for sympathy. Politicians choose their careers, and it’s no secret that it’s a tough old game.

But I think very few enter into it fully conscious of quite how hard it can be — both for themselves and those around them.

Just as all heroin addicts tell themselves they won’t get hooked, every MP believes they will be the exception; they won’t fall into the same traps as their predecessors.

Some, very occasionally and very fleetingly, manage that. But many do not. Because the truth is, people don’t change politics. Politics changes people. That, at the heart of it, is why so many political marriages struggle.

Yes, of course Westminster is teeming with temptations and distractions.

But the bigger threat to marriages is politics itself: that all-consuming, insatiable passion.

Politics is a rival who, when your children are waiting for their bedtime story, demands your partner’s presence at the ballot box.

A diva who requires they attend a constituency event in a marginal seat 300 miles up country, even though it’s Friday night and you haven’t seen each other all week.

A mistress who, when you try to explain that, actually, Saturday evenings are family time or that, no, you really can’t cancel another family holiday, simply pulls your beloved back into line with a flick of her whip. All-consuming, all-powerful and utterly ruthless.

And, to the sort of personality who is attracted to Westminster in the first place, virtually irresistible.

How could any wife — or husband, for that matter — possibly compete? It’s like pitting Mrs Doubtfire against Mata Hari.

Faced with that kind of daily challenge, even the happiest and healthiest of relationships can begin to falter.
 
By Daley Mayle
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#553774
Faced with that kind of daily challenge, even the happiest and healthiest of relationships can begin to falter.
Sounds like this woman of a certain age has got the hots for the cute, new cub reporter.

And here's to you Mrs Sarah Vine...


'Uh... uh... are you tryin' to seduce me Mrs Vine?'
 
By youngian
Membership Days Posts
#553776
Johnson could become the new Henry Bolton; Moves in with the younger fancy woman and declares his love. And then loses his Uxbridge seat along with his newspaper columns and all his other perks. He could have been a contender Ms Symonds but most likely has a one-way ticket to Palookaville.
 
By Safe_Timber_Man
Membership Days Posts
#555745
It would be nice if this struggle she's facing made her a bit more empathetic and understanding towards her fellow humans and a little less of a vicious and outright unpleasant individual. It's a shame that when she's doing one of her usual personal, nasty, sneering attacks on her chosen target she doesn't stop and think "Well maybe this person is also facing challenges like me and I should maybe be a bit nicer". Alas.



My agony hooked on anxiety pills: Like millions of women, SARAH VINE was given antidepressants to cope with her ‘black dog’. In this brave and raw account, she reveals the crippling hidden cost: the hell of withdrawal
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/arti ... k-dog.html

What image springs to mind when you think of the term ‘addict’? Some poor drunk, reeking of alcohol at breakfast? A party girl who’s lost her way? Someone whose life is chaotic, desperate, on the fringes of the law?

Or do you picture a middle-class wife and mother with a busy full-time job and a happy home life, who doesn’t drink or smoke to excess, is often to be found tucked up in bed by 11pm, rises at 6:30am and who — to all intents and purposes — lives an ordered and fulfilling existence?

That’s me. I am that addict. The only real difference between me and the more common perception is that the drugs I take, antidepressants, are legal and available on prescription.

I’m not alone, either. There are millions of us on antidepressants — around seven million in England alone. That’s 16 per cent of the adult population — one of the highest rates in the world.

And although from the outside we may look fairly normal, although we may lead functional, useful lives, we have one inescapable characteristic we share with even the most chaotic and out-of-control addicts: we cannot stop taking the drugs, because if we do the withdrawal symptoms will cripple us.

This week a new study, published in the Journal of Addictive Behaviours and commissioned by the All Party Parliamentary Group for Prescribed Drug Dependence, found that of these seven million, four million face the risk of serious withdrawal symptoms when they try to stop taking their medication.

These can include disorders such as nausea, insomnia, extreme irritability and chronic fatigue. Researcher Dr James Davies, of Roehampton University, said: ‘This new review reveals what many patients have known for years — that withdrawal from antidepressants often causes severe, debilitating symptoms which can last for weeks, months or longer.’

Doctors now believe that this explains in large part why so many people end up on medication indefinitely; and why the number of people reliant on medication in their day-to-day lives is steadily increasing — at an annual cost to the NHS of £250 million.

I know this only too well. Because I have tried and failed to come off. But each time I’ve had to relent: the withdrawal was too debilitating.

The fact that I find myself in this situation is a source of great shame and embarrassment to me. It is not something I am remotely proud of. It’s not something I particularly want to talk about either — no one enjoys laying bare their weaknesses and failings. But given the vast numbers of people who share my predicament, I felt it might perhaps help lift some of the stigma that surrounds this very tricky subject.

Before I started taking antidepressants, I was always one of those people who thought that pills were the easy way out.

Sure, I had experienced difficult periods in my life, during childhood and then as a young adult. The usual sort of stuff: exam pressure, work stress, emotional trauma. But each and every time I had picked myself up, dusted myself down. What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger was my guiding motto.

Even after I had my second child, my boy, and was diagnosed with post-natal depression by a very worried professor who thought I should really be in a clinic, I refused to take antidepressants.

It wasn’t just that I didn’t like the idea of being dependent on a pill to feel normal; I felt it would be more useful and more constructive in the long term to tackle the root cause of my unhappiness, rather than mask it chemically.

And it worked. Perhaps because it was my first real brush with the old black dog, I was able to return to some semblance of sanity (insofar as juggling work and two small children can ever be described as sanity!) through a combination of therapy and life changes.

We moved house — back to a familiar neighbourhood and familiar friends — I took up yoga, and the unshakable feeling that I was trapped inside the boot of a speeding car heading straight for a brick wall began to recede.

I think I might have even been OK had life continued as normal. But the 2010 General Election saw David Cameron become Prime Minister. Within days my husband was appointed Secretary of State for Education, a job he believed in passionately. For him it was the culmination of years of thought and planning. For me it was the start of a rollercoaster ride that, looking back, I simply wasn’t prepared for.

No one is particularly interested in the challenges politicians and their families face, and I’m certainly not searching for sympathy. So I won’t bore you with the details — suffice to say that the vicissitudes of public life had their effect, and somewhere around the spring of 2012 I found myself back in the boot of that metaphorical car.

I was experiencing uncontrollable mood swings, irrational fears, sleeplessness and an overwhelming feeling of helplessness. I was struggling to concentrate and hopelessly forgetful. Even basic tasks such as shopping for groceries seemed somehow beyond my reach. I felt like every day was a struggle.

The only problem was that this time I didn’t have the excuse of a new baby. This time I couldn’t just disappear from view, take time out, press the reset button. Not now that the whole world was watching (well, probably not — but it felt like that) and the stakes were so high.

I had to carry on functioning, to maintain some semblance of normality, not least for the sake of my children, but also for my own sense of self.

I couldn’t let anyone — not my employer, not my family, not the trolls on social media nor my husband’s enemies, who would have been delighted to exploit any weakness — see a chink in the armour.

So when the doctor suggested Prozac, I thought — why not? Just to take the edge off until things settle down a bit. What harm can it do?

I still remember that extraordinary feeling as, after a few days, the medication began to kick in. My main worry had been that it would somehow affect my ability to think, to write, to work. That it would cloud my mind and knock the edges off.

But the opposite happened. As the worry and panic that had flooded my brain for months and turned everything soft and soggy now began to recede, I felt myself becoming sharper.

The everyday tasks which, in my anxiety, I had found almost impossible to tackle — dealing with bills, organising the children’s timetables, taking the car for its MoT — suddenly seemed as they were: simple and straightforward. My memory improved. I rediscovered my enthusiasm for going out. I was able to sleep again, instead of sitting up late into the night fretting.

Most importantly, I no longer felt that if I failed to wake up the next morning, perhaps it wouldn’t be such a bad thing for everyone concerned.

In short, the drugs worked. They stabilised my emotions sufficiently to allow me to regain control of my day-to-day life.

I remember phoning a friend in Scotland, elated. ‘I’m never coming off this stuff!’ I said. She, wisely, said nothing. In reality, like most people who take antidepressants, I had no intention of staying on them for ever.

Just until things had gone back to normal, I told myself. Except, life being what it is, things didn’t return to normal. If anything, they got more complicated.

I sometimes wonder whether being on antidepressants has, to a certain extent, influenced the course of my life. Whether, without that chemical crutch, I would have done things differently. Whether the emotional anaesthesia that I have been under for these past few years has led me to take on challenges that, without the drugs, I would not have felt equipped to tackle.

I guess I’ll never know. But I do know this, from experience. In its natural state, the mind tells us when it finds itself under strain. We become sad, unhappy, fearful — all normal, healthy reactions to adversity. Physical pain acts as a warning sign from the body that something is wrong or broken, and emotional pain has the same function.

But if you are taking antidepressants, that process is disrupted. You are, to a greater or lesser extent, numb to your own feelings. And just as if you mask physical pain with pills you can end up pushing your body beyond its ability, potentially making the problem worse, numb the emotional pain and you end up doing the same to your soul.

The pills may help you to cope on the surface; but the underlying problem never goes away. Indeed, it may even get worse.

I certainly believe that this is what happened to me. On the outside, foolishly blind to the deepest of wounds. Inside, well, not so much.

And just as any addict over time develops a tolerance to the drugs, requiring ever higher doses just to feel normal, I reached a point when the inevitable happened: the drugs stopped working.

It was a bit like waking up in the middle of an operation: now my pain was physical as well as mental — I was unable to move in the mornings, was experiencing shooting muscle pains, terrible headaches — and an overwhelming sense of crushing fatigue.

This time they put me on something called Duloxetine — used in the treatment of major depressive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, neuropathic pain, chronic musculoskeletal pain and fibromyalgia. Bingo. As I sank into my new chemical bath, all my aches and pains melted away. Once again, I was able to face the world.

Without it, I doubt whether I would have been able to cope with the stress of the EU referendum (in which my husband campaigned to leave) or the subsequent fallout of the Brexit vote (both political and personal) or the 2017 general election — or, for that matter, moving house.

But cope I did, and so it was that earlier this year I decided the time had finally come to kick my dependence.

It wasn’t just that I felt a desire to experience life in the raw again; it was also that for the past few years I have suffered from tinnitus, a high-pitched ringing in my ears which varies according to my levels of stress and tiredness, but which began around the same time I started on the Duloxetine. I had a notion that it might improve if I came off it.

This wasn’t going to be easy. Duloxetine is renowned for its withdrawal symptoms, which are generally more severe than with other antidepressants of this type.

A 2005 study in America found that 44 per cent of users experienced withdrawal symptoms, which include dizziness, headaches, nausea, diarrhoea, paresthesia (a burning or prickling sensation, particularly in the limbs), irritability, insomnia and suicidal thoughts.

I knew from experience that in my case even forgetting a dose was liable to trigger some of these symptoms, especially the burning sensation in the limbs and the dizziness — as well as what some patients have described as ‘brain zaps’, a kind of weird buzzing behind the eyes (it’s very hard to put into words, but trust me: it’s not nice). Oh, and the irritability, which creeps up on you like a thief in the night.

With this in mind, I spoke to my doctor, and we agreed a programme of tapering off, gradually reducing my dose from 60 mg per day to 40, then 20, and then doing away with it altogether over a period of three months.

Has it been successful? In a word, no. No matter how careful I am, no matter how slowly I go, I still end up experiencing all of the above, plus some horrendous nightmares into the bargain.

As I write, I am still taking the stuff — albeit on a much reduced dose. I still have raging tinnitus, I still have muscle pain, I still get dizzy spells and, if I don’t get my sleep, can be extremely testy.

I don’t blame my doctors for any of this. They were simply doing their best with the tools at their disposal.

But I do think that if there were more investment in mental health services in general, more awareness of the alternatives to medication and better information about how and where to get help, fewer people would end up going down the antidepressant route.

Because however useful they may be, they are only ever a sticking plaster for the real problem.

But I am determined. Not least because, for all the adverse effects of ditching this drug, I can already feel some of the positive ones. I may no longer be — in the immortal words of Pink Floyd — ‘comfortably numb’; instead I am uncomfortably but unquestionably alive. Alive to the world around me, to the people I love — and to myself, my own feelings and emotions that for so long have been sedated.
 
By MisterMuncher
Membership Days Membership Days Posts
#555763
I'm not saying Sarah Vine hasn't got anxiety or depression. But...

Her article is replete with clichés about happy pills, pulling yourself together and the idea that there's some simple trigger that will make it all go away. More than that, it revolves around the idea that needing drugs for mental health issues is a weak approach, and you should just gut it out. And for that, she can go fuck herself.
lord_kobel, Kreuzberger, Boiler and 2 others liked this
 
By Bones McCoy
Membership Days Posts
#555805
MisterMuncher wrote:
Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:11 am
I'm not saying Sarah Vine hasn't got anxiety or depression. But...

Her article is replete with clichés about happy pills, pulling yourself together and the idea that there's some simple trigger that will make it all go away. More than that, it revolves around the idea that needing drugs for mental health issues is a weak approach, and you should just gut it out. And for that, she can go fuck herself.
Her situation has never got an airing until "Pills are bad" became story of the week across the press.
  • 1
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 54
Brexit Fuckwit Thread

"Prime Minister, I have President Trump on th[…]

...Married brothers having separate households i[…]

It was/is working across my Apple devices but perh[…]

What's left? Revoke article 50. Let's think […]