Discussion of article from the Mail's columnists and RightMinds contributors
:sunglasses: 69.2 % :thumbsup: 7.7 % :grinning: 7.7 % 😟 7.7 % :shit: 7.7 %
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
By D.C. Harrison
Membership Days Posts
#503453
Daley Mayle wrote:Plus there's the thrill of seeing Donald Trump playing Biff when they go into the future
Pedant point: Biff as Trump happens in an alternative 1985, where Future Biff goes back to the Fifties to hand Past Biff a book of sports results, on which to build a fortune.

As you were.
 
By youngian
Membership Days Posts
#513924
Do you live in green belt area? If so you're an absolute bastard according to Rod
Welcome to the green belt: a safe space for lily-livered Londoners

its inhabitants are increasingly the same bad-tempered, moaning, sociopathic middle-class tossers that one finds in the capital. People who have got the hell out of London to avoid being the victims of an acid attack, or a jihadi stabbing, or an LGBTQI workshop. But they still want quick and ready access to London. In other words, it IS London, in all but name. And that will change too – soon there will be no green belt at all, it will just be London. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/w ... londoners/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
By Safe_Timber_Man
Membership Days Posts
#534769
Rod is boycotting Centre Parcs for pulling their advertising with The Mail.

What a cock :lol:


Why are businesses like Center Parcs so terrified of a small minority?
I’m boycotting everyone who boycotts the Daily Mail
I am boycotting Center Parcs. Admittedly, this is not going to have an enormous impact upon my life. It’s a bit like announcing with great pride and fervour that I am boycotting Clare Balding or Pakistan or goat’s cheese. All of those things I am perfectly able to live without and already do so. I will never eat goat’s cheese, visit Pakistan or watch Clare Balding.

I did once visit Center Parcs, mind — about ten years ago. It was excruciatingly awful — the kids hated it as much as we did. Extortionately expensive, restrictive, boring and full of who I can only describe as ‘tossers’ cycling along tarmacked lanes through scrubby faux-woodland with their awful children shrieking in kind-of hanging baskets affixed to the back wheels. A place for middle-class people possessed of no imagination and too much money. The awful chain-food slop in the overpriced restaurants, the supposed attractions which resembled the stuff in the brochure in much the same way as Theresa May resembles Margaret Thatcher. The enforced jollity and the petty little niggling rules, designed to screw as much money out of you as possible. A confected simulacrum of nature and wildness for people who really hate both of those things.

So, no loss then. As a political activist, I yearn for the day when I am forced to boycott something I actually care about and would miss. Such as cigarettes or toad in the hole. Or indeed Virgin East Coast trains — which I did in fact boycott for a week when it announced it would no longer sell or give out copies of the Daily Mail on its dreadful, deteriorating, bankrupt service from London to the north-east. This was a real problem, as my only alternative to get up to Teesside was Grand Central, which has far fewer services and takes longer. But old beardie Branson caught wind of the flak coming his way and smartly reversed the decision. So now I’m back with Virgin — until it is mercifully nationalised next year.

The Center Parcs boycott has been similarly occasioned. Its head office has announced, in pious tones, that it will no longer be placing adverts with the Daily Mail on account of something written by one of the newspaper’s columnists, Richard Littlejohn. The offending paragraph from Mr Littlejohn reads as follows: ‘I’d rather children were fostered by loving gay couples than condemned to rot in state-run institutions, where they face a better-than-average chance of being abused. That said, I still cling to the belief that children benefit most from being brought up by a man and a woman.’

I suppose there must be some people in the UK who disagree with that assessment — my wife, for example, who thinks kids would be better off in local authority care rather than placed with a gay couple. I suspect that if you asked the question in an opinion poll, a good 80 per cent would agree with the thesis: ‘children benefit most from being brought up by a man and a woman.’

I am boycotting Center Parcs. Admittedly, this is not going to have an enormous impact upon my life. It’s a bit like announcing with great pride and fervour that I am boycotting Clare Balding or Pakistan or goat’s cheese. All of those things I am perfectly able to live without and already do so. I will never eat goat’s cheese, visit Pakistan or watch Clare Balding.

I did once visit Center Parcs, mind — about ten years ago. It was excruciatingly awful — the kids hated it as much as we did. Extortionately expensive, restrictive, boring and full of who I can only describe as ‘tossers’ cycling along tarmacked lanes through scrubby faux-woodland with their awful children shrieking in kind-of hanging baskets affixed to the back wheels. A place for middle-class people possessed of no imagination and too much money. The awful chain-food slop in the overpriced restaurants, the supposed attractions which resembled the stuff in the brochure in much the same way as Theresa May resembles Margaret Thatcher. The enforced jollity and the petty little niggling rules, designed to screw as much money out of you as possible. A confected simulacrum of nature and wildness for people who really hate both of those things.

So, no loss then. As a political activist, I yearn for the day when I am forced to boycott something I actually care about and would miss. Such as cigarettes or toad in the hole. Or indeed Virgin East Coast trains — which I did in fact boycott for a week when it announced it would no longer sell or give out copies of the Daily Mail on its dreadful, deteriorating, bankrupt service from London to the north-east. This was a real problem, as my only alternative to get up to Teesside was Grand Central, which has far fewer services and takes longer. But old beardie Branson caught wind of the flak coming his way and smartly reversed the decision. So now I’m back with Virgin — until it is mercifully nationalised next year.

The Center Parcs boycott has been similarly occasioned. Its head office has announced, in pious tones, that it will no longer be placing adverts with the Daily Mail on account of something written by one of the newspaper’s columnists, Richard Littlejohn. The offending paragraph from Mr Littlejohn reads as follows: ‘I’d rather children were fostered by loving gay couples than condemned to rot in state-run institutions, where they face a better-than-average chance of being abused. That said, I still cling to the belief that children benefit most from being brought up by a man and a woman.’


I suppose there must be some people in the UK who disagree with that assessment — my wife, for example, who thinks kids would be better off in local authority care rather than placed with a gay couple. I suspect that if you asked the question in an opinion poll, a good 80 per cent would agree with the thesis: ‘children benefit most from being brought up by a man and a woman.’

Sign up to the Evening Blend email
Our must-read daily political analysis, with a look ahead to tomorrow’s events

Sign up
But the 80 per cent do not matter anymore. The 80 per cent have no purchase. Far more important are the 1 or 2 per cent who insist that not merely is Littlejohn wrong, but that his moderately expressed opinion constitutes ‘hate speech’ and that any newspaper which publishes such an unspeakable vileness must be punished.

And so the congenital idiots who run Center Parcs can swathe themselves in the glory which attends — briefly, very briefly — to companies which connive with such a censorious, politically correct closing down of debate. They are hip, with-it, right-on and virtue-signalling, despite being an organisation which treats its staff, according to a worker, as follows: ‘You are a slave for a very poor wage, 12-hour shifts, one day off a week. If you are a good worker, your management will put more work load on you than your other colleagues, creating an unhealthy work environment. Customers pay huge amounts of money to be disappointed with facilities.’ No kidding, mate, on that last point.

And a quick suggestion to the SJW legions who now approve of Center Parcs for its progressive policies, by the way. Check out the differences in pay between men and women at their godawful resorts. Check out how much the cleaners — almost all women — earn.

But then you can level the same charge of hypocrisy against the mimsy, boring stationery chain Paperchase — hell, here’s another boycott which isn’t going to spoil my evening — which recently announced it would not be advertising with the Daily Mail for more generic politically correct reasons.

And yet this is how our businesses act these days: oblivious to the views of the 80 per cent, terrified of the views of the 1 per cent. You can see it in the Christmas advert put out by John Lewis a few months ago. Voted the worst of the major Christmas adverts. Because, in its desperation to be right on, it featured a mixed-race couple. And I suspect that the British people are getting sick of this social engineering being rammed down their throats at every available opportunity. They don’t think there’s anything wrong with mixed race couples, per se — it’s simply that increasingly the advertisers and the companies (and the TV shows, especially on the BBC) are insisting that this is firstly how society actually is and secondly, if it isn’t, then definitely how it should be.

And the ordinary viewer recoils, because he is being force-fed political propaganda along with commercial propaganda. All to keep that tiny minority happy. Don’t be surprised if next year’s John Lewis ad shows a transgendering mixed-race eight-year-old finding a vagina in his stocking. And don’t be surprised if the British people hate that, too.


What he's intentially missing is that these companies that boycott the Daily Mail aren't doing it because they have some bee hive mentally in support of homosexuals. They're doing it because they don't want their brand associated with facism and everything the likes of the Daily Mail stands for. It's not a good image.

Reducing it down to "PC lefties are giving into to the queers" is easy and will fool the readers into agreeing but Rod is just about intelligent enough to know that is not what this is about. The sort of corporate big wigs that make these kind of decisions probably aren't even left wing. They may even be Mail readers. But they're smart and they know a toxic brand when they see one. They're not giving in or scared of anyone. To claim that is wilfully ignorant.
 
By youngian
Membership Days Posts
#534775
This turd is sold out apperently

Image
If Rod Liddle is one of your guilty (or not so guilty) pleasures and you’ve been toying with the idea of subscribing to The Spectator, then we have the perfect excuse.

We do reader events every so often, the most popular of which have been with Rod Liddle. They have both sold out in a flash. The last one, a thousand-seater venue, was filled within four days – we barely had time to put an advert in the magazine. This time, we’ve booked Rod again – but this time in the 2,300-seater London Palladium on Tuesday 15 May at 7pm. It will be the biggest event ever held by The Spectator. https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/02/f ... palladium/
 
By Safe_Timber_Man
Membership Days Posts
#534779
Shitting hell...imagine paying money to sit and listen to Rod Liddle droning on for hours about complete bollocks. I get that Right wing gobshites have a bit of a market but Rod Liddle? I'd rather go talk politics with the local piss stained drunk who chucks stones at pigeons. I genuinely didn't realise he actually had a committed following.
 
By Bones McCoy
Membership Days Posts
#534784
Am I missing something that would make this entertaining.
As in A 12 round bout between Rod Liddle and Anthony Joshua.
or
Rod repeats Piers Morgan's plucky batting against the Aussie quicks.
Catkins liked this
By Rosvanian
#534803
Wow. So there's Rod Liddle, champion of the non metropolitan, non liberal, non elite, 'performing' for a paid audience in the heart of that London, the heart of darkness as far as he and the like minded are concerned. I expect that Rod's 'show' will consist of him reading out a list of people whom he believes are 'cunts' followed by an extended rant about the BBC. How do you string that out for two hours?
 
By MisterMuncher
Membership Days Membership Days Posts LikeBB
#534875
I may be misinformed, but I understand that Liddle's ticket sales aren't anything of the kind, but a bonus for subscribers to The Spectator. Which makes a certain amount of sense, and probably bodes for a less than full house despite the notion it's "sold out".
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 13
On the Radio

SCREENWIPE!!!

She used to be Europe Minister.

Labour, Generally.

Just waiting for Jez to fuck up Starmer's proposal[…]

Interesting point from somebody worth following ge[…]