We will be recalling correspondents from some less newsworthy parts of the globe, such as north Africa and south-east Asia, so they can focus on palace matters instead. And we will shortly be making available to readers a range of attractive commemorative crockery.
Quite seriously - this story downplays what is clearly a string of bullying incidents. In this case the victim is pelted with sweets. The intention is not to injure, but to humiliate.Read the story. This was part of an ongoing series of incidents - probably bullying. This sort of story makes it less, rather than more likely that victims will report bullying, so it does a great service to kids, doesn't it, in the puerile drive to get a 'controversial' headline. Well done...
Yep, punish the boy for being bullied. Idiot.If this is true, then the "assaulted" boy,his parents and the police should be taken to court for wasting police time and taxpayers money. The mind boggles.
- robbo , notts, 1/4/2011 11:43
I thought that was a spoof until I read the Melanie Phillips comment,which is surely lifted straight from her latest column?Killer Whale wrote:Good editorial in the Guardian today announcing that from now on it will be supporting the monarchy.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree ... yal-moment" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nice "forced" there. Forced by whom or what? David Cameron? Harriet Harman?The boy's family called the school and police, who were forced to intervene by taking Nathan home the same day.
Don't forget his gang of friends. Surely that counts as feral yoof?Tubby Isaacs wrote:Do you think Mail readers would like marshmallow chucker if they met him?
Hitchens has entered pointless tit phase. Christ[…]
How odd that Johnson says it's a matter for Bi[…]