Page 16 of 16

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:31 pm
by davidjay
Parsons and Burchill haven't really changed all that much. They were always contrarians, and now that railing against the Establishment is much more commonplace, they feel duty-bound to support it.

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:49 pm
by Kreuzberger
Outfluencers. You heard it here first (possibly).

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:59 am
by Cyclist
Are you sure they're not effluencers?

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 9:41 am
by satnav
Nice attempt here by the Mail to knit two stories together.

Prince Charles may have visited Prince Philip to reassure him about Harry amid 'momentous' family events, despite his father not wanting any 'fuss', Royal expert says - as Duke of Edinburgh spends sixth night in hospital

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:19 pm
by youngian
‘Amid’ is a popular reporter’s word to knit two weak stories together into a more interesting one.

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:05 pm
by Bones McCoy
youngian wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:19 pm
‘Amid’ is a popular reporter’s word to knit two weak stories together into a more interesting one.
'May have' is another popular reporter's phrase to introduce shit that never happened.

Re: Fawning over the royal family

Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2021 12:33 am
by The Red Arrow