Archive of topics from before June 2012. PM a mod to get one reopened.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
By Ebon Badger
Membership Days
#100076
Well, in 1950s land women didn't have abortions or babies out of wedlock, despite tonnes of evidence to the contrary. It's not that crazy if viewed from a no sex before marriage lens. It's the fail's stance on sex ed that pisses me off most. It hates abortion and underage pregnancies, but doesn't want the kind of sex ed the Dutch have that would reduce both these things
 
By Ebon Badger
Membership Days
#100313
New sex education should be that if young/any males impregnants a child/woman under age or over and has no intention of remaining as a husband to the lady, their testicles should be removed, this surely will get the message across rapidly. The cost of free abortions are causing further debt to a bankrupt country. How much one wonders do venerial treatments cost us all?
All in all decent Christians are again being ripped off by feral and heathen sexual acitivty

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... l#comments#ixzz0qlA3NsXh


So, 89 teenagers have had multiple abortions, and naturally that's the fault of the sex ed, as though going back to the days when there was no sex ed and people still got pregnant is an improvement. I'm sorry, but I've seen too many old and middle aged women saying things like "When I went into hospital to have my first, I still wasn't sure what was going to happen or how" to think that no sex ed at all is a good thing. And the contradictory messages we give out about sex in this country really aren't helping.
 
By Ebon Badger
Membership Days
#100317
I first thought that she had to be a crank, then I read it again, and realised that no, mail believing christians really do fail that hard. Heathen sex! Every time a Christian makes a baby they are indulging in pagan practices and are going to hell! The worst thing is, I bet I could become a celeb on the christian fundawhackjob circuit by publishing a book proposing such a viewpoint :roll:
By Waterstones
Membership Days
#100318
Can anybody remember a TV programme shown on Channel 4 back in 2007 about how Christian fundamentals used some MP's to advance their intrests in the Commons?,some of the filming took place during when MP's had the chance again to cut the abortion limit from 24-weeks to 18,I think it was?,some of the footage centered on that crazy Tory MP Nadine Dorries who had a campagin to cut the Abortion limit,and who was being backed by Christian groups but by the Mail and Amanda Platell,ring any bells on here? :?
 
By ACG
Membership Days Posts
#100323
it does, fairly sure i saw it. might have been a "dispatches", other than that i can't help.
By Mailydail
#102194
Waterstones wrote:The Mail can't stand single Mothers,but if one of them want a abortion in Daily Mail land they are scum.What the fuck gives? :twisted:


From what I've seen the majority of comments on abortion-related stories tend to be pro-choice, and the DM itself would never take a definite stance on the issue for fear of pissing off a large group of its readers...
By Waterstones
Membership Days
#118736
Can anybody on here tell me what The Mail's stand on abortion is?,I ask because they really seemed to want the 24-hour limit cut when it came up for a vote in 2007,yet they really don't like the thought of abortion places being firebombed judging from that article that was in the Mail a few weeks ago on abortion violence in America but given how they don't abortion anyway I would thought that would have been up their street,any thoughts? :?
Stephen Glover

When the mask slips, Corbyn neither thinks nor ta[…]

Apropos of KFC.. On twitter they follow 11 peopl[…]

Labour, Generally.

Indeed and here's Black's account of that meeting […]

Meanwhile in America

There was a piece on the news about a massive demo[…]