Area for all other political discussion
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
By new puritan
Membership Days Posts
#418196
New piece from John Curtice. Haven't had chance to read the whole thing, but:

There is no single straightforward explanation for Labour’s election losses, either in Scotland or in Britain as a whole. But to win a fresh hearing among key demographics, writes John Curtice, the party must convince voters that it can create a better and more appealing economy, not just competently steward it.

Labour is in shock. The party may not have expected to win an overall majority on 7 May, and might even have been surprised if it had come first in seats. But it certainly did not anticipate ending up with fewer seats than it had five years ago, and thereby being left without any prospect of being able to negotiate its way to power via deals and understandings with smaller parties.

One advantage of this shock is that the defeat is being taken seriously. It has been described as the party’s worst result ever, and has even led some to question the party’s long-term future. However, shock also has its disadvantages. Faced with trying to account for the unexpected, there is a tendency to grab the first plausible answer that comes along, and particularly to resort to explanations that accord with existing preconceptions of how the party should comport itself. For example, in his instant commentary on the defeat, Tony Blair argued that the party needs to return to the ‘centre ground’ and show that it is for ‘ambition and aspiration’.

But if one thing is clear about this election, it is that the temptation to look for one single straightforward explanation or response should be resisted. After all, its outcome marked the final death-knell of the idea that there is such a thing as a single Britain-wide electoral contest. There was, in truth, one election outcome in England and Wales and another very different one in Scotland. Both outcomes have to be taken on board if an adequate response to Labour’s electoral woes is to be identified.


http://www.ippr.org/juncture/a-defeat-t ... urs-losses
By new puritan
Membership Days Posts
#418323
Useful infographic showing the distribution of the vote by social class. Labour seems to have done fairly well among lower-middle class professionals (it didn't even trail the Tories by much among the higher-up professionals). Ukip's support seems to be fairly cross-class.

http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/gra ... YVSAflVikq
 
By Malcolm Armsteen
Membership Days Posts
#418328
Interesting. It would be informative to see that crossed against age, where we've been told the Tory and UKIP votes are strongest.
 
By Messianic Trees
Membership Days Posts
#499406
Inside story of the Tory election scandal
Thanks to the Electoral Commission report, we now know that some of the Conservative party's central spending did benefit MPs in the tightest races, but it was not declared. It is possible even that this money helped to secure the victories from which the Conservative majority was derived. Slowly, a chilling prospect emerges that British politics, our relationship with Europe and the future of our economy, were all transformed following a contest that wasn't a fair fight.
 
By Bones McCoy
Membership Days Posts
#499415
Messianic Trees wrote:Inside story of the Tory election scandal
Thanks to the Electoral Commission report, we now know that some of the Conservative party's central spending did benefit MPs in the tightest races, but it was not declared. It is possible even that this money helped to secure the victories from which the Conservative majority was derived. Slowly, a chilling prospect emerges that British politics, our relationship with Europe and the future of our economy, were all transformed following a contest that wasn't a fair fight.
Interesting:

In the light of various stories about jobs being lost to robotic information, parhaps there's a parallel in politics.
A party where most members have been replaced by big data and campaigning employees.
 
By Andy McDandy
Membership Days Posts
#499497
Moneyball strategy. Narrow wins in a few marginals are more important than doomed fights in "safe" Labour or LD seats. Whatever your constituency majority, an MP is an MP, and all that matters is getting over that line marked 325.
  • 1
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
Theresa May

So by not calling the Mail out by name, May is obv[…]

Brexit Fuckwit Thread

"Statistic show those with a higher education[…]

SPOTY

Yeah...the Mailites are really not happy! Supe[…]

Europe? And the Future of Britain in Europe

Do a lot of the daft gits who voted leave know tha[…]