Never having been involved with retail premise I may have the wrong end of the stick, but; I was under the impression that business rates were nominally a source of income for local authorities, l believe it all goes into a central pot but the idea I assume is, in general terms, to help local authorities. I also assume with it being a central pot some local authorities may get better looked after than others. So overall I'm guessing a cut in business rates is not all it hopes to achieve. Where's with rents, they go to the owner landlord, and I think it's safe to assume that a lot of high street property is in the portfolio of some company registered in the Cayman Island, who most probably don't give a flying fuck about the average high streetTubby Isaacs wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:13 pmWhen's Johnson going to "cut business rates to help the high street", as he's promised?
Good argument here that this is only a very short term boost. Rents will rise because to make up for the cut in rates.
Cutting business rates will help individual high street stores in the short run, but will not help in the longer run. It is a misunderstanding of basic economics to think otherwise. The biggest winners from a cut in business rates will be the biggest landowners — the Duke of Westminster, the Queen — and not the high street shops, or their customers.
Doubtless Common Man Boris will do it anyway.
It's the polar opposite of what Trump would do...satnav wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 8:28 pmIt was interesting seeing pictures of today's meeting of world leaders in Berlin to discuss the future of Libya. When they took a group picture of all the leaders Boris positioned himself on the fringes of the group. Will this be Britain's official position at the end of the month a minor player on the fringes of international politics?
Will it be that MEP prick Martin Daubney who made anti climate change films? Maybe Ken Loach will want to mark our exit from the CIA controlled capitalist Common Market.we’re now actively recruiting the best film professionals available
If there's a real Mark Dukes out there, he must be royally getting the piss ripped out of him todayThe Red Arrow wrote: ↑Thu Jan 23, 2020 10:03 amStill reckon it can't happen here, kids?
Propaganda – Gov’t creates film factory to rewrite Brexit history
20th January 2020 / United Kingdom
https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingd ... t-history/
The influence exerted on the prime minister by his partner, Carrie Symonds, will be explored in court after permission was granted last week for a judicial review into how the government came to pull a cull on badgers in Derbyshire.
The case could embarrass Boris Johnson and raise questions about the government’s willingness to listen to its advisers when formulating policy.
Last autumn the environment secretary, Theresa Villiers, ordered Natural England to scrap a cull in Derbyshire, where badgers are being vaccinated against TB, a decision warmly endorsed by Symonds and Goldsmith. The decision came three weeks after Symonds was briefed by Dominic Dyer, head of the Badger Trust, which opposes the cull.
The farmers union, the NFU, believes this meeting played a key role in the government ignoring scientific advice in favour of retaining the cull and sought a judicial review to determine how the decision was reached.
Last week the High Court confirmed the judicial review could proceed, meaning the NFU’s lawyers will be able to examine in court the basis on which the government pulled the cull. https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... adger-cull
Got my ballot today. 1. Keir Starmer 2.Lisa Nandy […]
Priti Patel must be the first person to have been […]
Yesterday Boris made it clear that getting a trade[…]
This is rather excellent. https://medium.com/@[…]